Drug-labels.com

Miacalcin Nasal Spray 200 IU Product Monograph

The product monograph is written for health professionals. Plain-language information for patients is in the patient medication information: pregnancy and breastfeeding.

Updated:
Facts
Status:
Prescription (Rx) Current status: Cancelled Post Market
Strength:
200 UNIT
Active ingredient:

Product Monograph - Miacalcin Nasal Spray 200 IU

SUMMARY PRODUCT INFORMATION

Route of

Administration

Dosage Form / StrengthClinically Relevant Nonmedicinal Ingredients
Nasal spray200 IU/actuationBenzalkonium chloride, hydrochloric acid, sodium chloride and purified water. For a complete listing see Dosage Forms, Composition and Packaging section.

INDICATIONS AND CLINICAL USE

MIACALCIN* (synthetic calcitonin; salmon) Nasal Spray is indicated for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in females greater than five years postmenopause with low bone mass relative to healthy premenopausal females. Significant effects on lumbar vertebral bone mineral density , but not on forearm and hip bone mineral density, have been demonstrated. (see Clinical Trials)

MIACALCIN* Nasal Spray is recommended in conjunction with an adequate calcium (at least 1000 mg elemental calcium per day) and vitamin D (400 I.U. per day) intake to retard the progressive loss of bone mass.

Geriatrics (> 65 years of age):

Clinical trials using MIACALCIN* NS have included postmenopausal women up to 77 years of age. No unusual adverse events or increased incidence of common adverse events have been noted in patients over 65 years of age.

Pediatrics (< 18 years of age):

The safety and efficacy of MIACALCIN* in children have not been established.

CONTRAINDICATIONS

  • Known hypersensitivity to salmon calcitonin (s-calcitonin) or to any component of the formulation (See WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS and ADVERSE REACTIONS).

WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS

Immune

Allergic Reactions

Because calcitonin is a polypeptide, the possibility of a systemic allergic reaction exists. There have been rare reports of serious allergic-type reactions, such as bronchospasm, swelling of the tongue or throat, tachycardia, hypotension, collapse and anaphylactic shock in post marketing. The usual provisions should be made for the emergency treatment of such a reaction should it occur. Allergic reactions should be differentiated from generalized flushing and hypotension.

Skin testing should be considered prior to treatment with MIACALCIN* NS for patients with suspected sensitivities to calcitonin. (see Monitoring and Laboratory Tests section)

Ear/Nose/Throat

Nasal Examinations

Nasal adverse events occurred in 17% of patients who received MIACALCIN* (synthetic calcitonin; salmon) Nasal Spray and in 14% of patients who received placebo nasal spray in studies in postmenopausal females. Therefore, a nasal examination should be performed prior to start of treatment with nasal calcitonin and at any time nasal complaints occur.

In all postmenopausal patients treated with MIACALCIN* Nasal Spray, the most commonly reported nasal adverse events included rhinitis (8.2%), nasal dryness (3.9%), epistaxis (2.4%), and sinusitis (1.6%). In clinical trials in another disorder (Paget’s Disease), 2.8% of patients developed nasal ulcerations.

If severe ulceration of the nasal mucosa occurs, as indicated by ulcers greater than 1.5 mm in diameter or penetrating below the mucosa, or those associated with heavy bleeding, MIACALCIN Nasal Spray should be discontinued. Although smaller ulcers often heal without withdrawal of MIACALCIN*Nasal Spray, medication should be discontinued temporarily until healing occurs.

Special Populations

Pregnant Women: There are no adequate and well controlled studies in pregnant women with s-calcitonin. MIACALCIN* NS is not indicated in pregnancy.

Synthetic calcitonin (salmon) has been shown to cause a decrease in fetal birth weights without any fetal abnormalities in rabbits when given by injection in doses 70-278 times the intranasal dose recommended for human use based on body surface area . Since synthetic calcitonin (salmon) does not cross the placental barrier, this may be due to metabolic effects in the pregnant animal.

Nursing Women: It is not known whether this drug is excreted in human milk and should not be administered to nursing mothers.

Synthetic calcitonin (salmon) has been shown to inhibit lactation in animals and should not be administered to nursing mothers.

Pediatrics (< 18 years of age): The safety and efficacy of MIACALCIN* in children have not been established. Its use is not recommended in pediatrics.

Geriatrics (> 65 years of age): Clinical trials using MIACALCIN* NS have included postmenopausal women up to 77 years of age. No unusual adverse events or increased incidence of common adverse events have been noted in patients over 65 years of age.

Monitoring and Laboratory Tests

Skin testing should be considered prior to treatment with MIACALCIN* NS for patients with suspected sensitivities to calcitonin. The following procedure is suggested: Prepare a dilution of 10 IU per mL by withdrawing 0.05 mL of commercially available synthetic calcitonin (salmon) solution for injection in a tuberculin syringe and filling it to 1.0 mL with Dextrose Injection 5%, USP (or Saline Injection, USP). Mix well, discard 0.9 mL and inject intracutaneously 0.1 mL (approximately 1 IU) on the inner aspect of the forearm. Observe the injection site 15 minutes after injection. The appearance of more than mild erythema or wheal constitutes a positive response.

ADVERSE REACTIONS

Adverse Drug Reaction Overview

The most commonly reported adverse events with MIACALCIN* (synthetic calcitonin; salmon) Nasal Spray were local effects such as rhinitis, nasal dryness with crusting, non-severe epistaxis and sinusitis.

In normal adults, who have a relatively low rate of bone resorption, the administration of exogenous calcitonin results in only a slight decrease in serum calcium. When bone resorption is more rapid, decreases in serum calcium are more pronounced in response to calcitonin.

Clinical Trial Adverse Drug Reactions

Because clinical trials are conducted under very specific conditions the adverse reaction rates observed in the clinical trials may not reflect the rates observed in practice and should not be compared to the rates in the clinical trials of another drug. Adverse drug reaction information from clinical trials is useful for identifying drug-related adverse events and for approximating rates.

MIACALCIN* (synthetic calcitonin; salmon) Nasal Spray has been evaluated for safety in more than 650 patients treated for osteoporosis for up to two years.

Table 1 is based on controlled trials in patients treated with MIACALCIN* NS at doses of 50, 100, 200, or 400 IU/day for up to 2 years. The table includes all AEs with an incidence of 1% or greater in the MIACALCIN* NS all combined doses treatment group, irrespective of causal relationship to study drug.

In approximately one-half of the patients tested after six months or more of treatment, indications of circulating antibodies to salmon calcitonin were obtained. In most patients the presence of antibodies does not reduce the clinical efficacy of exogenous salmon calcitonin.

Table 1: Common AEs occurring in ≥ 1% of patients receiving MIACALCIN*NS, combined doses treatment group for up to 2 years, by body system (regardless of study drug relationship)

Body system/ Adverse Event

MIACALCIN* NS (n=697)

%

Placebo (n=389)

%

Respiratory thoracic and mediastinal disorders

Rhinitis

Nasal dryness

Epistaxis

Nasal Crusting

Nasal discomfort

Sinusitis

Upper Respiratoty Tract Infection

Nasal Irritation

Pharingitis

8.2

3.9

2.4

2.2

1.6

1.6

1.4

1.4

1.0

5.4

3.6

2.1

2.8

1.0

0.5

2.3

1.5

1.0

Gastro-intestinal disorders

Abdominal pain 3.0

1.5

Constipation

1.7

1.8

Nausea

1.7

1.0

Dyspepsia 1.6 0.3

General disorders

Influenza symptoms

Fatigue

1.6

1.1

2.6

0.3

Vascular disorders

Hypertension

Flushing

1.7

4.6

0.8

5.1

Nervous system disorders

Headache

Depression

Dizziness

2.7

1.6

1.6

2.8

1.5

0.8

Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders

Back pain

Arthralgia

Bone fracture

Arthrosis

2.9

2.0

1.4

1.0

0.8

1.8

1.5

1.0

Eye Disorders

Lacrimation abnormal

1.00.8

Infections and infestations

Cystitis

Infection

1.1

1.4

1.0

1.0

MIACALCIN* has also been evaluated for safety in more than 900 patients, who were at least 1-year postmenopausal, treated for up to 5 years in the Prevent Recurrence of Osteoporotic Fractures (P.R.O.O.F.) Trial. Similar types of adverse reactions were reported in this study. However, the incidence for adverse reactions in this trial, involving 942 patients exposed to MIACALCIN* Nasal Spray and 307 patients exposed to placebo nasal spray, were generally higher than in the 2 year trials due to the longer observation period. In addition, these events were reported with a similar frequency in both the MIACALCIN* and placebo groups.

Table 2 includes P.R.O.O.F AEs occuring in ≥ 1% of patients receiving MIACALCIN*NS, assessed as definitely, probably, possibly, or unlikely drug related by the investigators.

Table 2: P.R.O.O.F: AEs occurring in ≥ 1% of patients receiving MIACALCIN*NS, regardless of study drug relationship

Body system/ Adverse Event

MIACALCIN* NS

(n= 942) %

Placebo (n=307) %

General disorders and

administration site conditions

Edema (e.g. tongue, extremity, face, generalized)

Accidental trauma*

Asethenia*

Chest pain*

Hot flushes*

3.1 1.0 1.3 2.9 1.32.6 1.3 1.0 2.9 2.0

Cardiovascular disorders

Arrhythmia*

1.01.6

Gastrointestinal disorders

Diarrhea,

1.81.0
Dysgeusia1.31.0

Hearing and Vestibular disorder

Ear Disorder* (eg sensation of fullness, stuffiness, blockage)

1.01.3

Immune system disorders

Allergy

1.61.4

Metabolic and Nutritional disorders

Hypercalcemia*

1.71.3

Muscoluskeletal disorders

Arthropathy*

Leg pain*

Pain* (eg musculoskeletal, general)

5.5 2.2 4.55.9 2.3 5.5

Nervous system disorders

Headache

Dysphonia*

Somnolence*

3.97.2

Respiratory, thoracic and

mediastinal disorders

Rhinitis (including nasal edema, nasal congestion, sneezing, allergic rhinitis)

Nasal discomfort (e.g. nasal odour, nasal mucosal erythema, mucosal excoriation).

Epistaxis

Rhinitis ulcerative

Abnormal Chest Sounds* (eg basilar, crepitations, rales) Skin Disorders

Skin disorder* (eg fissures,leisions, sores)

Dry skin*

30.6

15.8

12.6 3.4 1.2

1.6

1.1

20.8

13.0

11.7 1.6 1.0

0.7

0.3

Vascular Disorder Purpura1.30.7

Vision disorders

Cataract*

Eye abnormality* (dryness, infection, irritation)

Glaucoma*

2.8 1.2

1.0

1.3 2

0.0

*additional adverse reactions that occurred in the P.R.O.O.F. trial not included in the 2 years trial data.

Less Common Clinical Trial Adverse Drug Reactions (<1%)

Gastrointestinal disorders: Nausea, vomiting. These effects usually subsided spontaneously.

General disorders and administration site conditions: Dizziness, flushing accompanied by a sensation of heat and chills. These effects usually subsided spontaneously.

Genito-urinary disorders: Uncommonly polyuria. These effects usually subsided spontaneously.

Immune system disorders: MIACALCIN* Nasal Spray may give rise to hypersensitivity reactions such as generalized skin reactions, flushing, edema (facial, extremity and generalized), hypertension and arthralgia. Allergic and anaphylactoid-like reactions and single case of anaphylactic shock have been reported.

Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders: Nasal polyp, nasal septum ulceration, and nasoseptal deviation. Most of the nasal events were mild to moderate in severity and did not prompt discontinuation. MIACALCIN* Nasal Spray nasal adverse event rates were 73.5% mild, 24.3% moderate, and 2.2% severe (placebo nasal spray adverse event rates were 69.5% mild, 24.3% moderate, and 6.2% severe).

Abnormal Hematologic and Clinical Chemistry Findings

Antibodies to salmon calcitonin In approximately one-half of the patients tested after six months or more of treatment, indications of circulating antibodies to salmon calcitonin were obtained. In most patients the presence of antibodies does not reduce the clinical efficacy of exogenous salmon calcitonin. Urine sediment abnormalities Urine sediment abnormalities have not been reported in ambulatory volunteers treated with MIACALCIN* Nasal Spray. Coarse granular casts containing renal tubular epithelial cells were reported in the urine of young adult volunteers at bed rest who were given injectable synthetic calcitonin (salmon) in order to determine the effect of MIACALCIN* on immobilization osteoporosis. There was no other evidence of renal abnormality and the urine sediment became normal after salmon calcitonin therapy was stopped.

Post-Market Adverse Drug Reactions

Rash generalised, pruritis, tremor, cough, isolated anaphylactic-type reactions and anaphylactoid reactions including tachycardia, hypotension and collapse. Single case of anaphylactic shock have been reported. [M2; 2.5 Clinical Overview]

DRUG INTERACTIONS

Drug-Drug Interactions

Concomitant use of calcitonin and lithium may lead to a reduction in plasma lithium concentrations. The dose of lithium may need to be adjusted.

Formal studies designed to evaluate drug interactions with s-calcitonin have not been conducted.

Drug-Food Interactions

The interaction of MIACALCIN*NS with food has not been studied.

Drug-Herb Interactions

The interaction of MIACALCIN*NS with herbal medications or supplements has not been studied.

Drug-Laboratory Interactions

The interaction of MIACALCIN*NS with laboratory tests has not been studied.

Drug-Lifestyle Interactions

Effect on ability to drive and use machines: No studies exist on the effects of MIACALCIN*NS on ability to drive and use machines. MIACALCIN* NS may cause fatigue, dizziness and visual disturbances, which may impair the patient’s reactions. Patients must therefore be warned that these effects may occur, in which case they should not drive or use machines.

DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION

Dosing Considerations

Pediatrics (< 18 years of age): The safety and efficacy of MIACALCIN* in children have not been established. Use is therefore not recommended.

Elderly (> 65 years of age): Clinical trials using MIACALCIN*NS have included postmenopausal women up to 77 years of age.

Recommended Dose and Dosage Adjustment

The recommended dose of MIACALCIN* (synthetic calcitonin; salmon) Nasal Spray in postmenopausal women is one spray (200 IU i.e 0.2 mcg) per day administered intranasally, alternating nostrils daily.

Drug effect may be monitored by periodic measurements of lumbar vertebral bone mass to document stabilization of bone mass or increases in bone density.

Missed Dose

Patients who miss one dose of MIACALCIN* NS (salmon calcitonin) should not increase the dose of MIACLACIN* NS to compensate for the missed dose or doses, but should continue with therapy as soon as possible.

Administration

Instructions on priming of the pump upon first use of the device and nasal introduction of MIACALCIN* (synthetic calcitonin; salmon) Nasal Spray should be given to the patient. Instructions for patients are supplied with individual bottles. Patients should be asked to notify their physician if they develop significant nasal irritation.

Patients should be advised of the following:

  • Upon, first use only, the pump must be primed. The product should be allowed to reach room temperature before priming.
  • After priming and first use, the product should be stored at room temperature in an upright position. Each bottle contains 14 doses.

Overdosage

Nausea, vomiting, flushing and dizziness are known to be dose dependent when MIACALCIN* is administered parenterally. Such events might therefore also be expected to occur in association with an overdose of MIACALCIN*NS. Treatment would be symptomatic. Isolated cases of overdose have been reported but no serious adverse reactions have been associated with high doses.

Single doses of MIACALCIN* Nasal Spray up to 1600 I.U. and doses up to 800 I.U. per day for three days and chronic administration of doses up to 600 I.U. per day have been studied without serious adverse effects. A dose of 1000 I.U. of MIACALCIN* (synthetic calcitonin; salmon) injectable solution given subcutaneously may produce nausea and vomiting. A dose of MIACALCIN* injectable solution of 32 I.U. per kg per day for one or two days demonstrated no additional adverse effects.

There have been no reports of hypocalcemic tetany. However, the pharmacologic actions of MIACALCIN* Nasal Spray suggest that this could occur in overdose. Therefore, provisions for parenteral administration of calcium should be available for the treatment of overdose.

ACTION AND CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY

Mechanism of Action

Salmon calcitonin (s-Calcitonin) is a polypeptide hormone secreted by the parafollicular cells of the thyroid gland in mammals and by the ultimobranchial gland of birds and fish. It is of physiological importance in the regulation of calcium metabolism in certain animal species and may also have physiological importance in certain extraskeletal systems (e.g., GI and renal function).

MIACALCIN* (synthetic calcitonin; salmon) Nasal Spray (NS) markedly reduces the removal of calcium from bone in conditions with an increased rate of bone resorption such as osteoporosis. Osteoclast activity is inhibited, and osteoblast formation and activity seem to be stimulated. MIACALCIN* NS inhibits bone resorption, thus lowering abnormally increased serum calcium. Additionally, at the beginning of treatment it increases the urinary excretion of calcium, phosphorus, and sodium by reducing their tubular re-uptake. Serum calcium, however, is not reduced below the normal range.

Salmon calcitonin acts primarily on bone, but direct renal effects and actions on the gastrointestinal tract are also recognized. Salmon calcitonin appears to have actions essentially

identical to calcitonins of mammalian origin, but its potency per mg is greater and it has a longer duration of action. The actions of calcitonin on bone and its role in normal human bone physiology are still incompletely understood.

Single injections of synthetic calcitonin (salmon) result in a marked transient inhibition of the ongoing bone resorptive process. With prolonged use, there is a persistent, smaller decrease in the rate of bone resorption. Histologically this is associated with a decreased number of osteoclasts and an apparent reduction in their resorptive activity. Decreased osteocytic resorption may also be involved.

Because of its chemical nature (a peptide of 32 amino acids), calcitonin may be administered parenterally to achieve maximal absorption. Small percentages of the dose are apparently absorbed when administered by the buccal, oral, topical or inhalation routes; thus far, only the nasal absorption has been well substantiated and demonstrated to show a significant clinical effect.

Pharmacodynamics

All calcitonin structures consist of 32 amino acids in a single chain, with a ring of seven amino-acid residues at the N-terminus, the sequence of which differs from species to species. MIACALCIN* (Synthetic Calcitonin; Salmon) Nasal Spray is a synthetic polypeptide of 32 amino acids in the same linear sequence that is found in calcitonin of salmon origin. Due to the greater affinity of salmon calcitonin to receptor binding sites than calcitonins from mammalian species, including the synthetic human calcitonin, MIACALCIN* NS is more potent and longer acting. In terms of bioactivity, the potency of MIACALCIN* NS was found to be about half that of the drug given by i.m. or s.c. injection.

Osteoporosis is a disease characterized by low bone mass and deterioration of bone tissue architecture leading to enhanced bone fragility and consequent increase in fracture risk. The most common type of osteoporosis occurs in postmenopausal females. Osteoporosis is a result of a disproportionate rate of bone resorption compared to bone formation which disrupts the structural integrity of bone, rendering it more susceptible to fracture. The most common sites of these fractures are the vertebrae, hip, and distal forearm (Colles’ fractures). Vertebral fractures occur with the highest frequency and are associated with back pain, spinal deformity and a loss of height.

The primary action of calcitonin is on bone. Studies have shown that calcitonin most consistently affects the osteoclasts. These cells show decreased function, altered morphology and decreased numbers under the influence of calcitonin. Osteocytic osteolysis also appears to be depressed by this hormone. These effects result in the inhibition by calcitonin of bone resorption. Calcitonin may also stimulate osteoblastic bone formation, but decreases in osteoblastic function have also been reported and final conclusions are not yet possible.

Pharmacokinetics

Absorption: The data on bioavailability of MIACALCIN* NS obtained by various investigators using different methods show great variability, with a range varying between approximately 3 and 50% relative to intramuscular administration. As is the case with other polypeptide hormones, plasma levels of s- calcitonin are not predictive of the therapeutic response, and hence s-calcitonin activity should be evaluated by biochemical or clinical parameters. MIACALCIN* is absorbed rapidly by the nasal mucosa. Maximum plasma concentrations occur within the first hour of administration (median about 10 minutes).

The absolute bioavailability of synthetic calcitonin (salmon) is about 70% after either intramuscular or subcutaneous injection.

Distribution: In the dose range 100–400 IU, area under the plasma concentration curve (AUC) increases roughly in proportion to the dose. However, administration of doses higher than 400 IU does not result in further increases in the AUC for the drug.

The apparent volume of distribution is 0.15 - 0.3 L/kg, and protein binding amounts to 30-40%.

Metabolism: The patterns of tissue distribution of the hormone seem to differ for the three source species studied thus far and correlate with sites of degradation. Thus, porcine calcitonin tends to accumulate in the liver and kidney and both tissues degrade this form. Human calcitonin shows similar properties except that the kidney is relatively more important for the metabolism of human calcitonin than for porcine calcitonin. In the case of salmon calcitonin, accumulation and degradation seem to occur almost exclusively in the kidney.

Excretion: In the case of salmon calcitonin, accumulation and degradation seem to occur almost exclusively in the kidney. Degradation of all forms of calcitonin occurs by splitting the molecule into smaller fragments which are biologically and immunologically inactive. Very little renal excretion of the intact calcitonin molecule takes place. It appears that salmon calcitonin cannot cross the placental barrier.

For MIACALCIN NS, the half-life of elimination of synthetic calcitonin (salmon) is calculated to be around 20 minutes. There is no accumulation of the drug on repeated admnistration at 10-hour intervals for up to 15 days.

After either intramuscular or subcutaneous injection the elimination half-life is 70 to 90 minutes . Synthetic calcitonin (salmon) and its metabolites are excreted up to 95% by the kidney, the fraction of the parent drug being 2%.

Special Populations and Conditions

Pediatrics: The safety and efficacy of MIACALCIN* in children have not been established.

Geriatrics: Clinical trials using MIACALCIN* NS have included postmenopausal women up to 77 years of age. No unusual adverse events or increased incidence of common adverse events have been noted in patients over 65 years of age.

STORAGE AND STABILITY

Unopened MIACALCIN* Nasal Spray should be stored in the refrigerator between 2 and 8°C and protected from freezing.

After priming, MIACALCIN* Nasal Spray should be stored at room temperature (between 15-30°C ) and used within 4 weeks. To ensure correct delivery, the bottle should be kept in an upright position.

SPECIAL HANDLING INSTRUCTIONS

To ensure correct delivery, the bottle should be kept in an upright position.

Upon, first use only, the pump must be primed. The product should be allowed to reach room temperature before priming.

Pull up the protective cap, holding the bottle in an upright position, press down the upper part until it clicks. Repeat twice. After the first time the dose counter window shows white and red lines, after the second time white, and after the third time green. It is now ready for use.

After priming and first use, the product should be stored at room temperature in an upright position. Each bottle contains at least 14 doses.

DOSAGE FORMS, COMPOSITION AND PACKAGING

MIACALCIN* (synthetic calcitonin; salmon) Nasal Spray is available in spray bottles delivering at least 14 metered doses of 200 International Units (IU), one unit corresponding to about 0.2 mcg of synthetic calcitonin (salmon). MIACALCIN* NS spray bottles also contains the following nonmedicial ingredient: benzalkonium chloride, hydrochloric acid, sodium chloride and purified water.

Each pack contains 2 bottles of spray solution. The device is composed of a clear, uncoloured glass bottle (glass type I) and a spray mechanism containing an integrated, automatic dose-counting mechanism and a built-in mechanical stop.

PART II: SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION

PHARMACEUTICAL INFORMATION

Drug Substance

Proper name: salcatonin ; calcitonin salmon

Chemical name: L-Hemicystinyl-L-seryl-L-asparaginyl-L-leucyl-L-seryl-L-threonyl-L-hemicystinyl-L-valyl-L-leucyl-glycyl-L-lysyl-L-leucyl-L-seryl-L-glutaminyl-L-glutamyl-L-leucyl-L-histidyl-L-lysyl-L-leucyl-L-glutaminyl-L-threonyl-L-tyrosyl-L-propyl-L-arginyl-L-threonyl-L-asparaginyl-L-threonyl-glycyl-L-seryl-glycyl-L-threonyl-L-prolinamic-polyacetate-polyhydrate.

Molecular formula and molecular

mass:

C145H240N44O48S2 + X CH3COOH + Y H2O 3,431.88 + X 60.1 + Y 18.0

Structural formula:

H-Cys-Ser-Asn-Leu-Ser-Thr-Cys-

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Val-Leu- Gly-Lys-Leu-Ser-Gln-

8 9 10 11 12 13 14

Glu- Leu- His- Lys -Leu- Gln -

15 16 17 18 19 20

Thr-Tyr-Pro-Arg-Thr-Asn-Thr-

21 22 23 24 25 26 27

Gly-Ser-Gly-Thr- Pro-NH2 .X CH3COOH . YH2O 28 29 30 31 32

Physicochemical properties: A white or almost white, light powder. Freely soluble in water

CLINICAL TRIALS

Treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women

Effect on bone mineral density (BMD)

Study demographics and trial design

Two randomized placebo controlled trials were conducted in 325 postmenopausal females.

Table 3: Summary of patient demographics for clinical trials in postmenopausal women (effect on bone mineral density) Study #

Trial designDosage, route of administration and durationStudy subjects (n=325)

Mean age

(Range)

Gender

MIACALCIN* Nasal Spray

50 IU O.D.

100 IU O.D.

200 IU O.D.

+ 500 mg /day of oral calcium

2 years

“Established”† postmenopausal women

52 patients

52 patients

52 patients

SMC 522

Randomised, double blind, placebo-

controlled,

68-72

Placebo Nasal Spray O.D.

+ 500 mg daily oral calcium

2 years

52 patients

Female

MIACALCIN* NS

200 IU O.D.

36 patients

MIACALCIN* NS

200 IU 3 times / week (MWF)

35 patients

SMC 514

Randomised, double blind, placebo-

controlled,

48-64

Placebo NS O.D. or 3 times / week

(MWF)

46 patients

female

† Women who were greater than 5 years postmenopause

The two randomized placebo controlled trials were conducted in 325 postmenopausal females with spinal, forearm or femoral bone mineral density (BMD) at least one standard deviation below normal for healthy premenopausal females.

Study results

Table 4: Study results in postmenopausal women (effect on bone mineral density)

Primary EndpointsLumbar Vertebral BMD Mean Percent Change from Baseline in Valid Completer Patients between MIACALCIN* vs Placebo
SMC 522Treatment Group

Baseline

Mean ± SD1

Month 6

% Δ 2

(p-value)

Endpoint/ Month 12

% Δ

(p-value)

Month 18

% Δ

(p-value)

Endpoint/ Month 24

% Δ

(p-value)

50 IU O.D.0.778 ± 0.142

1.08

(0.294)

2.25

(0.029)

1.55

(0.046)

1.55

(0.042)

100 IU O.D.0.795 ± 0.124

1.30

(0.169)

1.33

(0.254)

1.90

(0.013)

1.45

(0.053)

200 IU O.D.

0.806 ±

0.135

1.78

(0.042)

2.44

(0.015)

1.76

(0.022)

2.05

(0.007)

Placebo

0.788 ±

0.142

0.340.450.130.004
SMC 514

Established

Postmenopausal Patient

% Δ 2 (p-value)

Early Postmenopausal Patient

% Δ 2 (p-value)

200 IU O.D.1.38 (0.007)-2.06 (0.322)
200 IU MWF-1.14 (0.582)-3.16 (0.952)
Placebo-1.73-3.10

1: Standard Deviation

2: Mean Percent Change from Baseline

These studies conducted over two years demonstrated that 200 I.U. daily of MIACALCIN* (synthetic calcitonin; salmon) Nasal Spray increases lumbar vertebral BMD relative to baseline and relative to placebo in females with osteoporosis or osteopenia who were greater than 5 year postmenopause. MIACALCIN* (synthetic calcitonin; salmon) Nasal Spray produced statistically significant increases in lumbar vertebral BMD compared to placebo as early as six months after initiation of therapy with persistence of this level for up to 2 years of observation.

No effects of MIACALCIN* (synthetic calcitonin; salmon) Nasal Spray on cortical bone of the forearm or hip were demonstrated. However, in one study, BMD of the hip showed a statistically significant increase compared with placebo in a region composed of predominantly trabecular bone after one year of treatment changing to a trend at 2 years that was no longer statistically

significant.

Effect on fracture incidence

Study demographics and trial design

The Prevent Recurrence of Osteoporotic Fractures Trial P.R.O.O.F. study included results from 1255 patients who were at least 1 year postmenopausal with a lumbar spine BMD of at least 2 standard deviations below the mean for young adult females, and at least 1 but not more than 5 thoracic or lumbar vertebral compression fractures at study entry. All patients received a daily supplement of 1000 mg calcium and 400 I.U. vitamin D.

Table 5: Summary of patient demographics for clinical trials in postmenopausal women (effect on fracture incidence)

Study #

Trial designDosage, route of administration and duration

Study

subjects (n=325)

Mean age (Range)

Gender

MIACALCIN* Nasal Spray

100 IU O.D.

200 IU O.D.

400 IU O.D.

+ oral calcium 1000 mg O.D

+ vitamin D 400 I.U O.D.

5 years

316 patients

316 patients

312 patients

320

P.R.O.O.F†

Multicenter, multinational , double

blind

Patients who were at least one year

postmenopausal

Placebo NS

+ oral calcium 1000 mg O.D

+ vitamin D 400 I.U O.D.

5 years

311 patients

Female

†: The Prevent Recurrence of Osteoporotic Fractures trial

Study results

Table 6: Study results in postmenopausal women (effect on fracture incidence)

Primary EndpointsThe risk of new vertebral fractures for MIACALCIN* NS vs Placebo (p-value)The risk of new and/or worsening vertebral fractures for MIACALCIN* NS vs Placebo (p-value)
P.R.O.O.F

36 % lower for MIACALCIN* NS 200 IU vs placebo

(p=0.020)

28 % lower for

MIACALCIN*NS vs placebo (p=0.064)

Based on a protocol scheduled 3-year all accrued data analysis, there was a statistically significant and clinically meaningful reduction in the proportion of patients experiencing new vertebral fractures with MIACALCIN* Nasal Spray 200 I.U. daily as compared to placebo.

In addition, MIACALCIN* Nasal Spray 200 I.U. /day reduced the proportion of patients experiencing multiple incident new and/or worsening vertebral fractures by 35% (25/286 in the 200 I.U. group versus 36/269 in the placebo group).

A 2 year supportive study (Study 522; Overgaard) included results from 208 patients, who received a daily supplement of 500 mg calcium, and were greater than 5 years postmenopause without previous fracture. The results of the incidence of new vertebral fractures was approximately two-thirds less in those patients who received MIACALCIN* Nasal Spray (doses ranging from 50 I.U. to 200 I.U. daily) compared with those who received placebo.

Circulating antibodies to salmon calcitonin after up to 60 months of treatment with MIACALCIN* NS 200 IU were reported in about half of the patients with osteoporosis in whom antibody studies were done. However the presence of circulating antibodies to synthetic calcitonin (salmon) does not reduce the clinical efficacy of the drug and, in addition, it has been suggested that antibody binding may actually prolong the activity of salmon calcitonin, perhaps through a slowing of the catabolism of this polypeptide.

DETAILED PHARMACOLOGY

Animal Studies

Calcitonin, particularly the salmon form, is extremely potent. As little as one nanogram given subcutaneously to young rats lowers the serum calcium by 1-2 mg%. Standardization of potency is based upon rat bioassay versus standards prepared by the Medical Research Council. Recently an official standard has been prepared (International Reference Preparation of Calcitonin, Salmon, for Bioassay). One International Unit (IU) = 1 MRC Unit.

Following parenteral administration, calcitonin is rapidly absorbed into the blood. Its half-life in the circulation, like that of other peptide hormones, is measured in minutes rather than hours. Salmon calcitonin, however, exhibits a relatively longer half-life than does porcine or human calcitonin. Immediately after introduction into the circulation, calcitonin is present in the free

form. Later it is largely protein bound, but this does not appear to interfere with either its biological or immunological activity.

By virtue of its ability to inhibit bone resorption, calcitonin decreases the flow of calcium from bone to blood and thus tends to lower blood calcium. The hypocalcemic effect of calcitonin is most marked when bone turnover proceeds at a high rate. Thus, decreases in serum calcium in young animals are more pronounced than those in adults.

The lowering of serum calcium with calcitonin can, under certain conditions, be as much as 3 to 4 mg% and this led to speculation that the hormone might induce hypocalcemic tetany. One case of symptoms of hypocalcemic tetany accompanying administration of human calcitonin has been reported. This symptom disappeared on administration of calcium salts.

Since no reliable model of the pathophysiology of diseases of bone metabolism in man exists, investigations are thereby limited. Salmon calcitonin is effective in preventing or reducing experimentally induced bone loss in a number of animal models (i.e. calcitonin inhibition of bone resorption and associated increase in bone mass/density).

In other studies calcitonin has been shown to reduce bone resorption stimulated by Vitamin D, Vitamin A or parathyroid hormone. The possible usefulness in promoting fracture healing in animal studies has been reported; further work is needed before conclusions can be reached.

Actions of calcitonin on gastrointestinal function have clearly been shown, though these are not yet fully understood. Variable effects on calcium absorption by the GI tract have been reported, with an increase in absorption the effect most frequently noted. In this regard, calcitonin could be acting directly or the hormone could invoke increased formation of 1,

25-dihydroxycholecalciferol which in turn would increase the absorption of calcium. Finally, the effect could be mediated by a secondary parathyroid mechanism whereby PTH, either directly or via the vitamin D mechanism, would act to enhance calcium absorption.

Other actions of calcitonin on GI function include an ability to decrease the volume and acidity of gastric secretions, as well as an inhibition of exocrine volume and enzyme secretion by the pancreas. Attempts to inhibit ulcer formation in animal experiments by reducing gastric secretion with calcitonin were successful in two studies.

Renal effects of calcitonin are well documented. It appears that calcitonin decreases the tubular reabsorption of calcium, leading to increased excretion of this ion (when other factors are not involved). Analogous effects of calcitonin are seen in magnesium handling, though the mechanism of this effect is somewhat less clear than for calcium. Sodium and phosphorus also experience decreased tubular reabsorption due to calcitonin. For these ions the effects appear to involve the proximal tubules. Actions of calcitonin on the handling of calcium and sodium by the kidney seem to be separate. In animal studies, salmon calcitonin appears to be markedly more natriuretic than porcine or human calcitonin though the effects of the hormone from these different species on calcium excretion are relatively similar. Potassium excretion is sometimes increased and sometimes unchanged by calcitonin. Increased excretion of water also occurs. Calcitonin appears to have little effect on glomerular filtration rate.

There are two modifying factors which are important in any consideration of the renal effects of calcitonin. The first involves a decrease in filtered load of calcium due to the hypocalcemic effect of the hormone. In acute situations especially, the decrease in tubular reabsorption of this ion results in a decrease rather than an increase in urinary calcium excretion. The second factor is increased parathyroïd hormone (PTH) secretion, secondary to the hypocalcemic effect of calcitonin. PTH acts directly on the kidney to increase the tubular reabsorption of calcium and magnesium and to decrease the reabsorption of phosphorus. The first two actions of PTH oppose those of calcitonin, while the effect on phosphorus complements the action of calcitonin. In any given situation the overall effects of calcitonin on urinary excretion are dependent upon several factors and the results can vary accordingly.

The dose level of calcitonin may also influence renal excretion, at least in regards to calcium. The effect of calcitonin on bone resorption appears to be more sensitive than is the effect on the renal tubular reabsorption of calcium. Thus, at low doses, calcitonin can sometimes lower urinary calcium excretion because of its effect on filtered load. At high doses the direct renal effect tends to predominate which results in an increased excretion of urinary calcium.

PTH secretion is directly controlled by levels of serum calcium, and acute decreases in the latter, caused by calcitonin, result in immediate increases in circulating levels of PTH. Chronic treatment with calcitonin could, therefore, conceivably give rise to hyperplasia of the parathyroids and increased levels of basal PTH secretion (secondary hyperparathyroidism). Certain animal data appear to support this possibility. There is also a reason to believe that the enhanced secretion of PTH during calcitonin administration modifies the effects that would otherwise be produced. For some effects PTH may tend to antagonize and minimize the actions of calcitonin. In other instances in the same animal, the effects of PTH and calcitonin may complement and reinforce one another.

For example, as explained above, calcitonin and PTH have opposite effects on the tubular reabsorption of calcium but reinforce each other in their actions on phosphate excretion. On bone the interactions of PTH and calcitonin are perhaps more important but less well understood. Increased PTH levels lead to enhanced osteoclastic activity, while calcitonin has the opposite effect. The outcome when both are present in continuing high levels has not been clarified. Interactions of these hormones on other bone cells are even less well understood. Increased levels of PTH have been implicated in enhanced bone formation, as well as increased bone resorption; both may prove to be significant factors in the long-term skeletal effects with chronic calcitonin treatment. Based on indirect evidence, cessation of calcitonin treatment appears to be associated with a return toward the pretreatment level of PTH secretion.

Repeated treatment of animals with very high doses of calcitonin has led to several unexplained changes. In a one month study in rabbits, histological changes were reported in follicular cells of the thyroid indicative of a hypersecretory state; changes were also noted in the parafollicular cells. In studies in young rats, treatment for seven days consistently led to decreases in thyroid and heart weight and to increases in red cell counts.

Human Studies

Kidney

Salmon calcitonin increases the excretion of filtered phosphate, calcium, and sodium by decreasing their tubular reabsorption. In some patients the inhibition of bone resorption by salmon calcitonin is of such magnitude that the consequent reduction of filtered calcium load more than compensates for the decrease in tubular reabsorption of calcium. The result in these patients is a decrease rather than an increase in urinary calcium.

Transient increases in sodium and water excretion may occur after the initial injection of salmon calcitonin. In most patients these changes return to pretreatment levels with continued therapy.

Gastrointestinal tract

Some evidence with injectable preparations suggest that calcitonin may have significant actions on the gastrointestinal tract. Short-term administration of injectable calcitonin results in marked transient decreases in the volume and acidity of gastric secretions and in the volume and the trypsin and amylase content of pancreatic secretions. Whether these effects continue to be elicited after each injection of salmon calcitonin during chronic therapy has not been investigated. These studies have not been conducted with MIACALCIN* NS.

TOXICOLOGY

Synthetic salmon calcitonin has been administered to animals acutely, subchronically and chronically by intravenous, subcutaneous and intramuscular routes. Rats, rabbits and dogs were used for these studies. Teratogenicity as well as perinatal and postnatal studies were conducted in rats and rabbits. The studies were carried out according to standard protocols. A sensitization study in guinea pigs was also completed because of the chemical nature of calcitonin.

Chronic Toxicity

Dogs given salmon calcitonin subcutaneously for six months at dosage levels of 20 to 80 units/kg/day exhibited partial to total anorexia with concurrent body weight loss during the first few weeks of the study. Thereafter, food consumption was similar in control and treated dogs.

Synthetic salmon calcitonin was administered subcutaneously at levels of 20 to 80 units/kg/day from day 15 of gestation through lactation in a perinatal and postnatal study. In this study there appeared to be a partial to complete failure in lactation in some treated dams. One litter in each of the treated groups gradually became cachectic before day 9 of lactation and died. Macroscopically the kidneys of several rats in both treated groups appeared mottled. Microscopically, hyaline casts in the medulla and cortex, dilatation of cortical tubules, interstitial nephritis (not associated with cast formation), and fat droplets and brown pigment in cortical tubular cells were seen. The following parameters in pups of treated dams were affected: pup weight at 24 hours, 4 days and 21 days, and lactation index.

In a repeat of the perinatal and postnatal study in rats, body weight of pups in treated groups was less than control pups, and the rate of stillbirth was more for pups of treated dams than for control pups. No macroscopic kidney changes were noted in dams. Microscopically the kidneys of several of the dams treated with 20 or 80 units/kg/day exhibited dilatation of renal collecting tubules with homogeneous casts. No such kidney changes were noted in dams treated with 5 units/kg/day.

In a third perinatal and postnatal study in rats, treatment with 320 units/kg/day from day 15 of pregnancy through the lactation period caused renal tubule dilatation and associated hyaline cast formation in 3 of 10 dams. No significant effect was noted in pups.

The sensitization study indicated that salmon calcitonin had no sensitizing potential in guinea pigs.

Nasal Tolerability

Long-term studies

The tolerance of MIACALCIN* nasal spray was assessed in the cynomolgus monkey following intranasal administration of 0 (control), 400, 800, and 1600 I.U./day for 26 weeks. No treatment related effects were noted with respect to clinical signs, body weight, ophthalmoscopy, and clinical chemistry. Macroscopic and microscopic examination of the respiratory tract and other tissues did not reveal any treatment related changes. There was no effect on bone mass, histomorphometric analysis of the bone did not reveal any differences in the indices investigated between treated and vehicle control group animals.

Probable treatment related effects on urinary parameters and kidney weights were apparent, although the changes observed were generally small and did not show a clear dosage relationship. The changes may be anticipated as it has been reported that calcitonin can exert an effect on the kidney, although the precise mechanism is not known. It was concluded that MIACALCIN* Nasal Spray was tolerated in the monkey at dosages up to 1600 I.U./day. The effects on urinary parameters and kidney weight were considered to represent a functional effect rather than an adverse effect to the treatment since no macroscopic or microscopic changes were observed in the kidney.

Short-term studies

Synthetic salmon calcitonin spray (200 I.U.) was administered intranasally six times a day for 4 weeks to 4 male and 4 female beagle dogs. No signs of reaction to treatment were detected including the nasal cavity and upper respiratory tract, and none of the animals died. Food consumption and body weight were normal. Physical examination after 3 weeks was unremarkable. Necroscopy did not reveal any treatment-related lesions or differences in organ weights.

A similar study in guinea pigs assessed the ciliary beat frequency (CBF) after 4 week intranasal administration of synthetic salmon calcitonin solution. Thirty guinea pigs received 2 x 0.01 mL

(400 I.U.) salmon calcitonin solution daily for 4 weeks. Measurements on CBF were taken immediately, 24 hours, and at 15 days after dosing in different treatment groups. It was concluded that the treatment showed no adverse effects on ciliary activity.

Local tolerability

Synthetic salmon calcitonin (200 I.U./0.01 mL) was administered by single instillation into the ocular sac of 3 male and 3 female albino New Zealand white rabbits. The study animals were examined one and 24 hours, and 2, 3, 4 and 7 days post-treatment. No overt effect upon the cornea, iris or conjunctivae of any rabbit was detected.

Carcinogenicity

Long-term Studies

Synthetic salmon calcitonin was administered subcutaneously (1.25-80 IU/kg/day) to 153 male and female sprague Dawley rats. An increase in the incidence of pituitary tumors was seen predominantly in the male and to a lesser degree in the female rats. Pituitary histopathology revealed a significant (p < 0.01) increase in the chromophobe cell adenomas in males receiving 20 IU/kg/day or more.

In two other studies, synthetic salmon calcitonin was not shown to induce the hyperplastic/neoplastic process, as a similar incidence of total proliferative lesions was observed in control and treated (80 IU/kg/day) animals. The latency period for the development of pituitary adenomas was however, reduced. This type of endocrine lesion is particularly common in the rat, a change in latency may be attributed to the disruption of the normal physiologic process involved in the development of the endocrine lesion in the rat.

Continuous administration of 80 IU/kg/day of synthetic salmon calcitonin with osmotic pumps seemed to reduce the latency period for the development of hyperplastic foci as compared to the subcutaneous injection of the same dose of calcitonin.

Short-term Studies

Synthetic salmon calcitonin was administered subcutaneously (20 IU/kg/day) in rats, either alone or in combination with diethylstilbestrol and/or bromocriptine for 8 weeks. The results obtained suggest that salmon calcitonin does not act directly or indirectly on lactotrophs to stimulate a proliferative response in the pituitary. A 3-month subcutaneous study of calcitonin (5 or 160 IU/kg/day) and disodium EDTA (150 mg/kg/day) revealed that it is not the calcium lowering activity of the drug which is responsible for the increase in incidence of pituitary lesions in rats. Subsequently, a combination of serum assays, immunohistochemical and Northern blot analyses have shown that the majority of proliferative lesions in the rats are non-functional and comprise cells which produce an alpha subunit common to glycoprotein hormones (LH, TSH, FSH). Moreover, the histomorphology of the proliferating non-functional lesions was consistent with lesions that occur spontaneously in aged laboratory rats.

Evidence suggests that the proliferative response in the pituitary of rats is a species-specific phenomenon. Similar findings have not been observed in mice treated with subcutaneous synthetic salmon calcitonin in doses ranging from (0.625 to 160 IU/kg/day) for periods of 13 weeks to 18 months, nor in dogs treated subcutaneously with synthetic salmon calcitonin (5 to 80 IU/kg/day) for 16 weeks.

Teratology

In a teratogenicity study in rats wherein synthetic salmon calcitonin was administered from day 6 through day 20 of gestation at 20 to 80 units/kg/day subcutaneously, two of 20 dams receiving the higher dosage level exhibited coarse tan mottling of both kidneys. In a repeat study in the same strain of rats no such macroscopic kidney changes were noted, and there were no microscopic pathologic changes in the kidneys related to treatment with salmon calcitonin.

In a teratogenicity study in rabbits, the mean fetal weight was decreased at 80 and 20 units/kg/day and the mean placental weight was decreased at 80 units/kg/day.

REFERENCES

  1. 1. Accardo G, Aleotti A, Ricci D, Pazza A. Support for the clinical use of calcitonin: electron microscope study of the functional state of bone cells of rats after chronic treatment with calcitonin. Curr. Ther. Res. 1982; 31: 422-433..
  2. 2. Buclin T, Randin J.P, Jacquet A.F, Azria M, Attinger M, Gomez F, et al.. The effect of rectal and nasal administration of salmon calcitonin in normal subjects. Calcif. Tissue Int. 41: 252-258, 1987.
  3. 3. Christiansen, C, Riis B.J., Hohansen, J. S. et al. 1987. The effect of nasal calcitonin on postmenopausal osteoporosis. Int. Symp. on Osteoporosis. Sept. 27 - Oct 2.
  4. 4. Copp, D.H. et al. Evidence for calcitonin. A new hormone from the parathyroid that lowers blood calcium. Endocrinology, l962; 70: 638.
  5. 5.

    Copp, D.H. et al. Calcitonin and ultimobranchial function of lower vertebrates. Calcitonin 1969.

    Proceedings of the Second International Symposium; William Heinemann Medical Books, Ltd., London, 1970; p. 281.

  6. 6.

    DeVernejoul, M.C., Pointillart, A., Bourdeau, A., Morieux, C. Modrowski, D., Miravet, L. and F.

    Caulin. 1990. Effect of calcitonin administration on young pig trabecular bone remodeling. Bone. 11: 29-33.

  7. 7. Doepfner, W.E.H. Pharmacological effects of calcitonin. 1983; Triangle 22: 57-67
  8. 8. Fournié A., Valverde C., Tap G., Bazerque J-J., Ayrolles C. Test d'hypocalcémie aiguë à la calcitonine de porc et de saumon. Rev. Rhum. 1977; 44: 91-98.
  9. 9. Gennari, C. Clinical aspects of calcitonin in pain. 1983; Triangle 22: 156-163.
  10. 10.

    Gennari, C., Gonnelli, S., Chierichetti, S.M., Piolini, M., Francini, G., Montagnani, M., Marbach,

    P. Antibody problem in calcitonin administration. In: Calcitonin 1984: Chemistry, Physiology, Pharmacology and Clinical Aspects. A. Pecile, ed., Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam; 1985; pp. 457-468

  11. 11. Geusens, P., Boonen, S., Nijs, J., Jiang, Y., Lowet, G., VanAuderkercke, R., et al. . Effect of salmon calcitonin on femoral bone quality in adult ovariectomised ewes. Calcif. Tissue Int 1996; 59: 315-320.
  12. 12. Goltzman, D., Mitchell, J. Calcitonin and calcitonin gene-related peptide: analysis of discrete and overlapping interactions at receptor sites. In: Calcitonin 1984: Chemistry, Physiology, Pharmacology and Clinical Aspects. A. Pecile, ed., Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam 1985; pp. 245-252,.
  13. 13. Gruber, H. E., Ivey J. L. et al. 1984. Long-term calcitonin therapy in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Metabolism 33:295-303.
  14. 14.

    Guttman, S. et al. Synthesis of salmon calcitonin, a highly active hypocalcemic hormone. Helv.

    Chim. Acta 1969; 52: 1789

  15. 15.

    Hartman D.A. et al. Abnormal urinary sediment during therapy with synthetic salmon calcitonin.

    J. Clin. Endocr. 1971; 33: 564,

  16. 16. Hywyler, R., Born, W., OhnHaus, E. E. 1979. Plasma kinetics and urinary excretion of exogenous human and salmon calcitonin in man. Amer. J. of Physioloy 239(1):E15-E19.
  17. 17.

    Ichikawa, Masaki, Nakamuta, Hiromichi, Hoshino, Takashi, Ogawa, Yasunao and Masao Koida.

    1994. Anti-osteopenic effect of nasal salmon calcitonin in Type 1 osteoporotic rats: Comparison with subcutaneous dosing. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 17(7): 911-913

  18. 18. Kurose, H., Seino, Y., Shima, M., Tanaka, H., Ishida, M., Yamaoka, K., Yabuuchi, H. Intranasal absorption of salmon calcitonin. Calcif. Tissue Int. 1987; 41: 249-251
  19. 19.

    Li, M., Shen, Y., Buron, K. W., DeLuca, P.P., Mehta, R.C., Baumann, B.D., and T. J. Wronski.

    A comparison of the skeletal effects of intermittent and continuous administration of calcitonin in ovariectomised rats 1996; 18(4): 375-380

  20. 20. MacIntyre, I., Stevenson, J. C. et al. 1988. Calcitonin for prevention of postmenopausal bone loss. Lancet ii:1481-1483.
  21. 21.

    Mosekilde, L. Assessing bone quality: Animal models in preclinical osteoporosis research.

    Bone. 1995; 17(4 Suppl.): 343S-352S.

  22. 22.

    Mosekilde, Lis, Danielsen, C. Christian, and J. Gasser. The effect on vertebral bone mass and strength of long term treatment with antiresorptive agents (estrogen and calcitonin), human parathyroid hormone (1-38) and combination therapy, assessed in aged ovariectomised rats.

    Endocrinol 1994; 134(5): 2126-2134

  23. 23.

    Niall, H.D. et al. Amino acid sequence of salmon ultimobranchial calcitonin. Proc. Nat. Acad.

    Sci. 1969; 64: 771

  24. 24.

    Nuesch E., Schmidt R. Comparative pharmacokinetics of calcitonins. In: Calcitonin 1980:

    Chemistry, Physiology, Pharmacology and Clinical Aspects. A. Pecile, ed., Excerpta Medica,

    Amsterdam, 1981; pp. 352-364

  25. 25. Overgaard, K., Riis, B. J., Christiansen, C. et al. . Effect of calcitonin given intranasally on early postmenopausal bone loss. Br. Med. J. 1989; 299:477.
  26. 26. Paillard, F. et al. Renal effects of salmon calcitonin in man. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 1972; 80(2): 200.
  27. 27.

    Parkes, C.0. et al. Purification of calcitonin from salmon ultimobranchial glands. Fed. Proc.

    1969; 28: 413.

  28. 28.

    Reginster, J.Y., Albert, A., Lecart, M.P., Lambelin, P., Denis, D., Deroisy, R., Fontaine, M.A.,

    Franchimont, P. One-year controlled randomised trial of prevention of early post-menopausal bone loss by intranasal calcitonin. Lancet 1987; 8574: 1481-1483.

  29. 29.

    Reginster, J.Y., Deroisy, R., Denis, D., Lecart, M.P., Sarlet, N., Franchimont, P. Is there any place for salmon calcitonin in prevention of postmenopausal bone loss? Gynecol. Endocrinol.

    1988; 2: 195-204.

  30. 30.

    Reginster, J. Y., Denis, D., Albert, A. 1987. First Biochemical and clinical results on the use of nasal salmon calcitonin in the prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Int. Symp. on

    Osteoporosis. Sept. 27 - Oct. 2.

  31. 31. Riggs, B. L. 1990. A new option for treating osteoporosis. New Eng J Med 323:124-125.
  32. 32. Shen, Y., Li, M. and T.J. Wronski. Calcitonin provides complete protection against cancellous bone lose in the femoral neck of ovariectomised rats. Calcif. Tissue Int. 1997; 60; 457-461
  33. 33.

    Stock, J., Avioli, L. V., Baylink, D. J. et al. for the PROOF Study Group. A multicentered, double-blind, randomized study to investigate the efficacy of Miacalcin (calcitonin-salmon) nasal spray in reducing the incidence of new vertebral fractures: three-year results (Abstract).

    American Soc. of Bone Mineral Research Meeting. Setp 10- Sept 1997.

  34. 34. Thamsborg, G., Storm, T. L., Brinch, E. et al. The effect of different doses of nasal salmon calcitonin on plasma cyclic AMP and serum calcium. Calcif. Tiss. Int. 1990; 46:5-8.
  35. 35. Thamsborg, G., Storm, T. L., Sykulski, R. et al. Effect of different doses of nasal calcitonin on bone mass. Calcif. Tiss. Int. 1991; 48:302-307.
  36. 36.

    Thamsborg, G., Storm, T. L., Sykulski, R. et al. Treatment with intranasal salmon calcitonin increases bone mass in postmenopausal females. (Abstract). World congress of Gynecology and

    Obstetrics. Oct. 1988.

  37. 37.

    Toccafondi, R., Brandi, M.L. Mavilia, C., Zonefrati, R. Biological effects of salmon calcitonin in osteoblast-like cells. In: Calcitonin 1984: Chemistry, Physiology, Pharmacology and Clinical

    Aspects. A. Pecile, ed., Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam. pp. 197-204, 1985.

  38. 38. Wallach, Stanley, Farley, John R., Baylink, David, J., and Leona Brenner-Gati. Effects of calcitonin on bone quality and osteoblastic function. Calcif. Tissue Int. 1993; 52:335-3
  39. 39. Wronski, T.J., Yen, C.F., Buron, K.W., Mehta, R.C., Newman, P.S., Soltis, E.E. et al. Skeletal effects of calcitonin in ovariectomised rats. Endocrinol. 1991; 129(4): 2246-2250
  40. 40.

    Zanussi, C., Marini, U., Rossi Ferinni, P.L., Scaltrini, G., Visca, U., Motta, P., Piolini, M.

    Calcitonin in multiple myeloma: a double-blind controlled clinical trial. In: Calcitonin, 1984:

    Chemistry, Physiology, Pharmacology and Clinical Aspects. A. Pecile, ed., Excerpta Medica,

    Amsterdam, pp. 379-388, 1985.

  41. 41. Ziegler, R. Calcitonin: analgesic effects. Cancer Res. 1984; 89: 178-184

About this document

Source: Health Canada – Drug Product Database (DPD) and product monographs · DIN (Drug Identification Number): 02240775

Revision date stated in the text: November 1, 2011

Found a mistake? Write to us via the contact page.

The information on this site does not replace the advice of a doctor or pharmacist.

Drug information for Miacalcin Nasal Spray 200 IU

Rx or OTC
Prescription (Rx)?
DIN 02240775
Schedule(s) PRESCRIPTION
Active ingredient(s) Calcitonin (salmon synthetic) 200 UNIT
Dosage form(s) Spray
Route(s) of administration Nasal
Drug class (WHO ATC)
  1. H Systemic hormonal preparations, excl. sex hormones and insulins
    1. H05 Calcium homeostasis
      1. H05B Anti-parathyroid agents
        1. H05BA Calcitonin preparations
          1. H05BA01 Calcitonin (salmon synthetic)
Company NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CANADA INC
Current status Cancelled Post Market
Current status date October 1, 2013

Source: Health Canada – Drug Product Database (DPD) and product monographs, data as of November 1, 2026. Data from the Health Canada Drug Product Database, as published there. Not a substitute for the advice of a doctor or pharmacist.