Drug-labels.com

NTP-Rosuvastatin Product Monograph

The product monograph is written for health professionals. Plain-language information for patients is in the patient medication information: pregnancy and breastfeeding.

Status:
Prescription (Rx) Current status: Cancelled Pre Market Facts
Strength:
5 mg, 10 mg, 20 mg, 40 mg

Product Monograph - NTP-Rosuvastatin

SUMMARY PRODUCT INFORMATION

Route of AdministrationDosage Form/StrengthAll Nonmedicinal Ingredients
OralTablets, 5 mg, 10 mg, 20 mg and 40 mgCrospovidone, hydroxypropyl cellulose, lactose monohydrate, microcrystalline cellulose, magnesium stearate, sodium bicarbonate, iron oxide yellow (5 mg tablets), iron oxide red (10 mg, 20 mg and 40 mg tablets), hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose, lactose monohydrate, titanium dioxide and triacetin.

INDICATIONS AND CLINICAL USE

Hypercholesterolemia

Adults

NTP-ROSUVASTATIN (rosuvastatin calcium) is indicated as an adjunct to diet, at least equivalent to the Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP III TLC diet), for the reduction of elevated total cholesterol (Total-C), LDL-C, ApoB, the Total-C/HDL-C ratio and triglycerides (TG) and for increasing HDL-C; in hyperlipidemic and dyslipidemic conditions, when response to diet and exercise alone has been inadequate including:

  • Primary hypercholesterolemia (Type IIa including heterozygous familial
hypercholesterolemia and severe non-familial hypercholesterolemia),
  • Combined (mixed) dyslipidemia (Type IIb),
  • Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia where NTP-ROSUVASTATIN is used
either alone or as an adjunct to diet and other lipid lowering treatments such as
apheresis.
Pediatrics (10 – 17 years of age)
NTP-ROSUVASTATIN is indicated as an adjunct to diet for the reduction of elevated total
cholesterol (Total-C), LDL-C and ApoB in boys and girls who are at least one year post-
menarche, 10 to 17 years of age with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (see
CLINICAL TRIALS), when response to diet alone has been inadequate.
Prevention of Major Cardiovascular Events
In adult patients without documented history of cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events, but
with at least two conventional risk factors for cardiovascular disease (see CLINICAL
TRIALS), NTP-ROSUVASTATIN is indicated to:
  • Reduce the risk of nonfatal myocardial infarction
  • Reduce the risk of nonfatal stroke
  • Reduce the risk of coronary artery revascularization

CONTRAINDICATIONS

NTP-ROSUVASTATIN (rosuvastatin calcium) is contraindicated:
  • In patients who are hypersensitive to any component of this medication (see DOSAGE FORMS, COMPOSITION AND PACKAGING).
  • In patients with active liver disease or unexplained persistent elevations of serum transaminases exceeding 3 times the upper limit of normal (see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS).
  • In pregnant and nursing women.

    Cholesterol and other products of cholesterol biosynthesis are essential components for fetal development (including synthesis of steroids and cell membranes). NTP-ROSUVASTATIN should be administered to women of childbearing age only when such patients are highly unlikely to conceive and have been informed of the possible harm. If the patient becomes pregnant while taking NTP-ROSUVASTATIN, the drug should be discontinued immediately and the patient apprised of the potential harm to the fetus. Atherosclerosis being a chronic process, discontinuation of lipid metabolism regulating drugs during pregnancy should have little impact on the outcome of long-term therapy of primary hypercholesterolemia (see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS, Special Populations, Pregnant Women, Nursing Women).

  • In patients using concomitant cyclosporine (see DRUG INTERACTIONS).
NTP-ROSUVASTATIN 40 mg is contraindicated in:
  • Asian patients
  • Patients with pre-disposing factors for myopathy/rhabdomyolysis such as:
  • Personal or family history of hereditary muscular disorders
  • Previous history of muscle toxicity with another HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor
  • Concomitant use of a fibrate or niacin
  • Severe hepatic impairment
  • Severe renal impairment (CrCl < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2) (see DOSAGE AND
ADMINISTRATION, Patients with Renal Impairment)
  • Hypothyroidism
  • Alcohol abuse
  • Situations where an increase in rosuvastatin plasma levels may occur.

WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS

General

Before instituting therapy with NTP-ROSUVASTATIN (rosuvastatin calcium), an attempt should be made to control hypercholesterolemia with appropriate diet, exercise, weight reduction in overweight patients, and to treat other underlying medical problems and associated cardiovascular risk factors. The patient should be advised to inform subsequent physicians of the prior use of NTP-ROSUVASTATIN or any other lipid-lowering agent.

Cardiovascular

Co-enzyme Q10 (ubiquinone)

Ubiquinone levels were not measured in rosuvastatin calcium clinical trials. Significant decreases in circulating ubiquinone levels in patients treated with other statins have been observed. The clinical significance of a potential long-term statin-induced deficiency of ubiquinone has not been established. It has been reported that a decrease in myocardial ubiquinone levels could lead to impaired cardiac function in patients with borderline congestive heart failure (see REFERENCES).

Endocrine and Metabolism

Endocrine Function

HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors interfere with cholesterol synthesis and lower cholesterol levels and, as such, might theoretically blunt adrenal or gonadal steroid hormone production. Rosuvastatin demonstrated no effect upon nonstimulated cortisol levels and no effect on thyroid metabolism as assessed by TSH plasma concentration. In rosuvastatin calcium treated patients, there was no impairment of adrenocortical reserve and no reduction in plasma cortisol concentrations. Clinical studies with other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors have suggested that these agents do not reduce plasma testosterone concentration. The effects of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors on male fertility have not been studied. The effects, if any, on the pituitary-gonadal axis in premenopausal women are unknown.

Patients treated with rosuvastatin who develop clinical evidence of endocrine dysfunction should be evaluated appropriately. Caution should be exercised if an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor or other agent used to lower cholesterol levels is administered to patients receiving other drugs (e.g. ketoconazole, spironolactone or cimetidine) that may decrease the levels of endogenous steroid hormones.

Plasma Glucose

In the JUPITER trial, rosuvastatin 20 mg was observed to increase plasma glucose levels, which were sufficient to shift some prediabetic subjects to the diabetes mellitus status (see ADVERSE REACTIONS).

Lipoprotein (a)

In some patients, the beneficial effect of lowered total cholesterol and LDL-C levels may be partly blunted by a concomitant increase in the Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] concentrations. Present knowledge suggests the importance of high Lp(a) levels as an emerging risk factor for coronary heart disease. It is thus desirable to maintain and reinforce lifestyle changes in high risk patients placed on rosuvastatin therapy.

Hepatic/Biliary/Pancreatic

Hepatic Effects

NTP-ROSUVASTATIN is contraindicated in patients with active liver disease or unexplained persistent elevations of serum transaminases exceeding 3 times the upper limit of normal.

As with other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, it is recommended that a liver function test be carried out prior to, and 3 months following, the initiation of NTP-ROSUVASTATIN or if the patient is titrated to the dose of 40 mg. NTP-ROSUVASTATIN should be discontinued or the dose reduced if the level of transaminases is greater than 3 times the upper limit of normal.

NTP-ROSUVASTATIN, as well as other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors should be used with caution in patients who consume substantial quantities of alcohol and/or have a past history of liver disease.

As with other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, a dose-related increase in transaminases has been observed in a small number of patients taking rosuvastatin (< 0.5%); the majority of cases were mild, asymptomatic and transient.

Hepatic Impairment

In subjects with varying degrees of hepatic impairment there was no evidence of increased exposure to rosuvastatin other than in 2 subjects with the most severe liver disease (Child-Pugh scores of 8 and 9). In these subjects, systemic exposure was increased by at least 2-fold compared to subjects with lower Child-Pugh scores (see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION, Patients with Hepatic Impairment).

Muscle Effects

Rare cases of rhabdomyolysis with acute renal failure secondary to myoglobinuria, have been reported with rosuvastatin and with other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors.

Effects on skeletal muscle such as myalgia, myopathy and, rarely, rhabdomyolysis have been reported in patients treated with rosuvastatin calcium at all doses and in particular with the 40 mg dose.

Myopathy, defined as muscle pain or muscle weakness in conjunction with increases in creatine kinase (CK) values to greater than ten times the upper limit of normal, should be considered in any patient with diffuse myalgias, muscle tenderness or weakness, and/or marked elevation of CK. Patients should be advised to report promptly any unexplained muscle pain, tenderness or weakness, particularly if associated with malaise or fever. Patients who develop any signs or symptoms suggestive of myopathy should have their CK levels measured. NTP-ROSUVASTATIN therapy should be discontinued if markedly elevated CK levels (> 10 x ULN) are measured or myopathy is diagnosed or suspected.

Pre-disposing Factors for Myopathy/Rhabdomyolysis

NTP-ROSUVASTATIN, as with other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, should be prescribed

with caution in patients with pre-disposing factors for myopathy/rhabdomyolysis. Such factors include:

  • Personal or family history of hereditary muscular disorders
  • Previous history of muscle toxicity with another HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor
  • Concomitant use of a fibrate or niacin
  • Hypothyroidism
  • Alcohol abuse
  • Excessive physical exercise
  • Age > 70 years
  • Renal impairment
  • Hepatic impairment
  • Diabetes with hepatic fatty change
  • Surgery and trauma
  • Frailty
  • Situations where an increase in plasma levels of rosuvastatin may occur.
In rosuvastatin calcium trials there was no evidence of increased skeletal muscle effects when
rosuvastatin calcium was dosed with concomitant therapy such as fibric acid derivatives
(including fenofibrate and gemfibrozil), nicotinic acid, azole antifungals and macrolide
antibiotics. However, an increase in the incidence of myositis and myopathy has been seen in
patients receiving other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors together with these medicines.
NTP-ROSUVASTATIN therapy should be temporarily withheld or discontinued in any
patient with an acute serious condition suggestive of myopathy or predisposing to the
development of rhabdomyolysis (e.g. sepsis, hypotension, major surgery, trauma, severe
metabolic endocrine and electrolyte disorders, or uncontrolled seizures).
Renal
Renal Impairment
Subjects with severe renal impairment (CrCl < 30 mL/min/1.73m2) had a 3-fold increase in
plasma concentration of rosuvastatin compared to healthy volunteers and, therefore, NTP-
ROSUVASTATIN 40 mg is contraindicated in these patients (see CONTRAINDICATIONS
and DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION, Patients with Renal Impairment).
In subjects with varying degrees of renal impairment, mild to moderate renal disease had little
influence on plasma concentrations of rosuvastatin.
During the clinical development program, dipstick-positive proteinuria and microscopic
hematuria were observed among rosuvastatin-treated patients, predominantly in patients dosed
above the recommended dose range (i.e. 80 mg). Abnormal urinalysis testing (dipstick-
positive proteinuria) has been seen in patients taking rosuvastatin and other HMG-CoA
reductase inhibitors. This finding was more frequent in patients taking 40 mg when compared

to lower doses of rosuvastatin or comparator statins. Shifts in urine protein from none or trace to ++ (dipstick) or more were seen in < 1% of patients at some time during treatment with 10 and 20 mg, and in approximately 3% of patients treated with 40 mg. The protein detected was mostly tubular in origin. In most cases, proteinuria was generally transient and it decreased or disappeared spontaneously on continued therapy. It has not been shown to be predictive of acute or progressive renal disease.

Nevertheless, a dose reduction may be considered for patients with unexplained persistent proteinuria during routine testing.

Sensitivity/Resistance

Hypersensitivity

An apparent hypersensitivity syndrome has been reported rarely with other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. This has included one or more of the following features: anaphylaxis, angioedema, lupus erythematous-like syndrome, polymyalgia rheumatica, vasculitis, purpura, thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, hemolytic anemia, positive antinuclear antibody (ANA), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) increase, eosinophilia, arthritis, arthralgia, urticaria, asthenia, photosensitivity, fever, chills, flushing, malaise, dyspnea, toxic epidermal necrolysis and erythema multiforme including Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Treatment should be discontinued if hypersensitivity is suspected (see CONTRAINDICATIONS).

Special Populations

Pregnant Women:

NTP-ROSUVASTATIN is contraindicated during pregnancy (see

CONTRAINDICATIONS).

Nursing Women:

It is not known whether rosuvastatin is excreted in human milk. Because of the potential for adverse reactions in nursing infants, women taking NTP-ROSUVASTATIN should not breast-feed (see CONTRAINDICATIONS).

Pediatrics (10 – 17 years of age):

Elevations in serum creatine phosphokinase (CK) > 10 x ULN were observed more frequently in pediatric patients treated with rosuvastatin calcium compared with placebo. CK elevation > 10 x ULN (with or without muscle symptoms) was more frequent with increasing rosuvastatin calcium dose (see ADVERSE REACTIONS, Pediatrics).

The evaluation of linear growth (height), weight, BMI (body mass index), and secondary characteristics of sexual maturation by Tanner staging in boys and girls who are at least one year post-menarche (10 to 17 years of age) with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia treated with rosuvastatin calcium was limited to a one-year period. Although endocrinology function, such as hormone disturbances, was not assessed, rosuvastatin calcium had no detectable effect on growth or sexual maturation. The effects on menstrual cycle were not assessed. Rosuvastatin calcium doses greater than 20 mg have not been studied in this patient population (see ADVERSE REACTIONS, Pediatrics, CLINICAL TRIALS, Pediatrics and DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION, Pediatrics).

Adolescent females should be counselled on appropriate contraceptive methods while on NTP-ROSUVASTATIN therapy (see CONTRAINDICATIONS and WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS, Special Populations, Pregnant Women).

Treatment experience with rosuvastatin calcium in pediatric patients (aged 8 years and above) with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia is limited to 8 patients.

Geriatrics (≥ 65 years of age):

There were no clinically significant pharmacokinetic differences between young and elderly patients (≥ 65 years) (see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION, Use in Elderly). However, elderly patients may be more susceptible to myopathy (see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS, Muscle Effects, Pre-disposing Factors for Myopathy/Rhabdomyolysis).

Race:

Results of pharmacokinetic studies, including a large study conducted in North America, have demonstrated an approximate 2-fold elevation in median exposure in Asian subjects (having either Filipino, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Vietnamese or Asian-Indian origin) when compared with a Caucasian control group. This increase should be considered when making rosuvastatin dosing decisions for Asian patients and the dose of 40 mg is contraindicated in these patients (see ACTION AND CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, Pharmacokinetics, Special Populations and Conditions, CONTRAINDICATIONS and DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION, Race).

ADVERSE REACTIONS

Adverse Drug Reaction Overview

Rosuvastatin calcium is generally well tolerated. The adverse events seen with rosuvastatin calcium are generally mild and transient.

Rosuvastatin calcium clinical trial experience is extensive, involving 9800 patients treated with rosuvastatin calcium in placebo controlled trials and 9855 patients treated with rosuvastatin calcium in active controlled clinical trials. Discontinuation of therapy due to adverse events occurred in 2.6% of patients receiving rosuvastatin calcium and 1.8% of patients receiving placebo. The most frequently reported adverse events at an incidence ≥ 1% and at a rate greater than placebo were arthralgia, upper abdominal pain and ALT increase. Adverse events observed or reported in short- and long-term trials are as follows.

Clinical Trial Adverse Drug Reactions

Because clinical trials are conducted under very specific conditions the adverse drug reaction rates observed in the clinical trials may not reflect the rates observed in practice and should not be compared to the rates in the clinical trials of another drug. Adverse drug reaction information from clinical trials is useful for identifying drug-related adverse events and for approximating rates.

Adults

Short-term Controlled Trials

Short-term controlled trials involved 1290 patients within placebo-controlled trials of 6 to 16

weeks’ duration (768 of which were treated with rosuvastatin) and 11641 patients within
placebo and active controlled clinical trials of 6 to 52 weeks duration (5319 of which were
treated with rosuvastatin). In all controlled clinical trials, 3.2% of patients were withdrawn
from rosuvastatin calcium therapy due to adverse events. This withdrawal rate was
comparable to that reported in placebo-controlled studies.
Associated adverse events occurring at an incidence ≥ 1% in patients participating in placebo-
controlled clinical studies of rosuvastatin are shown in Table 1.
Table 1 Number (%) of Subjects with Associated Adverse Events Occurring with
≥ 1% Incidence in any Treatment Group: Placebo Controlled Pool
Body System/ AdversePlacebo (%)Total Rosuvastatin (%)
Event(n = 367)(n = 768)
Whole Body
Abdominal pain2.21.7
Asthenia0.51.3
Headache2.21.4
Digestive
Constipation1.41.0
Diarrhea1.61.3
Dyspepsia1.90.7
Flatulence2.71.8
Nausea1.62.2
Musculoskeletal
Myalgia0.51.6
Nervous System
Dizziness1.60.5
Insomnia1.90.4
Long-term Controlled Morbidity and Mortality Trials

In the Justification for the Use of Statins in Primary Prevention: An Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin (JUPITER) study (see Part II: CLINICAL TRIALS) involving 17,802 participants treated with rosuvastatin calcium 20 mg once daily (n=8901) or placebo (n=8901), rosuvastatin calcium 20 mg was generally well tolerated. Subjects were followed for a mean duration of 2 years.

Discontinuation of therapy due to an adverse event occurred in 5.6% of subjects treated with rosuvastatin calcium and 5.5% of subjects treated with placebo. The most common adverse events that led to discontinuation from the study were: myalgia, arthralgia, abdominal pain and constipation. The associated adverse reaction reported in ≥ 1% of patients and at a rate greater than or equal to placebo was myalgia (2.4 % rosuvastatin calcium, 2.0 % placebo).

Treatment emergent adverse events regardless of causality occurring at an incidence ≥ 1% and at a rate greater than placebo in patients participating in the JUPITER trial are shown in Table 2.

Table 2 Number (%) of Subjects with Treatment Emergent Adverse Events

Regardless of Causality Occurring with ≥ 1% Incidence and > than Placebo: JUPITER

Placebo (%)Total Rosuvastatin (%)
Body System/ Adverse Event
(n = 8901)(n = 8901)
Blood
Anemia2.12.2
Cardiac
Palpitations0.91.0
Gastrointestinal
Diarrhea4.64.7
Constipation3.03.3
Nausea2.32.4
General disorders
Edema peripheral3.03.7
Fatigue3.53.7
Hepatobiliary
Cholelithiasis0.91.0
Infections
Urinary tract8.68.7
Nasopharyngitis7.27.6
Bronchitis7.17.2
Sinusitis3.74.0
Influenza3.64.0
Lower Respiratory tract2.72.9
Gastroenteritis1.71.9
Herpes zoster1.41.6
Injury
Contusion1.41.7
Investigation
ALT increased1.01.4
Blood glucose increased0.71.0
Metabolism
Diabetes mellitus2.53.0
Musculoskeletal
Back pain6.97.6
Myalgia6.67.6
Arthritis5.65.8
Arthralgia3.23.8
Muscle spasms3.23.6
Osteoarthritis1.41.8
Bursitis1.31.5
Neck pain1.01.1
Osteoporosis0.81.0
Neoplasms
Basal cell carcinoma0.91.0
Placebo (%)Total Rosuvastatin (%)
Body System/ Adverse Event
(n = 8901)(n = 8901)
Psychiatric
Insomnia2.32.5
Renal
Hematuria2.02.4
Proteinuria1.31.4
Respiratory
Epistaxis0.81.0
Less Common Clinical Trial Adverse Drug Reactions (< 1%)
The frequency of adverse events in all clinical trials and considered possibly, probably or
definitely drug related are as follows:

Uncommon (≥ 0.1% and < 1%):

Pruritus, rash, urticaria, arthralgia, muscle weakness,
arthritis, constipation, nausea, dyspepsia,
gastroesophageal reflux disease, ALT increase, creatine
phosphokinase increase, hepatic enzyme increase,
creatinine increase, paraesthesia, tremor, general pain,
proteinuria, sinusitis, insomnia, abnormal hepatic
function, vertigo, diabetes mellitus.

Rare (≥ 0.01% and < 0.1%): Myopathy (including myositis), rhabdomyolysis and hypersensitivity reactions including angioedema

The following additional adverse events were reported in controlled clinical trials, regardless of causality:

Accidental injury, back and chest pain, flu syndrome, infection, urinary tract infection,
diarrhea, flatulence, gastroenteritis, hypertonia, bronchitis, increased cough, rhinitis and
pharyngitis.
In long-term controlled clinical trials rosuvastatin calcium was shown to have no harmful
effect on the ocular lens.
Abnormal Hematologic and Clinical Chemistry Findings
As with other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, a dose-related increase in liver transaminases
and CK has been observed in a small number of patients taking rosuvastatin (see
WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS, Hepatic/Biliary/Pancreatic).
Abnormal urinalysis testing (dipstick positive proteinuria) has been seen in a small number of
patients taking rosuvastatin calcium and other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. The protein
detected was mostly tubular in origin. In most cases, proteinuria decreases or disappears
spontaneously on continued therapy, and is not predictive of acute or progressive renal
disease (see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS, Renal).
In the JUPITER trial, occurrences of diabetes mellitus as a pre-specified secondary outcome

were reported more frequently in the rosuvastatin calcium-treated patients (2.8%) than in placebo (2.3%) and a slight increase in the number of subjects whose fasting glucose levels increased to ≥ 5.6 mmol/L (126 mg/dL) was observed in subjects treated with rosuvastatin calcium. There was a 0.1% increase in mean HbA1c with rosuvastatin calcium compared to placebo. A causal relationship with statins and diabetes mellitus has not been definitely established.

Pediatrics (10 - 17 years of age)

The safety profile of rosuvastatin calcium in pediatric patients (boys and girls who are at least one year post-menarche, 10-17 years of age with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia) is similar to adults although CK elevations > 10 x ULN (with or without muscle symptoms) were observed more frequently in a clinical trial of pediatric patients.

Rosuvastatin calcium was evaluated in a multicentre double-blind, placebo-controlled study of pediatric patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. During the 12-week double-blind phase (n=176), patients were randomized to rosuvastatin calcium 5 mg, 10 mg or 20 mg or placebo. Four of 130 (3.0%) pediatric patients treated with rosuvastatin calcium (2 treated with 10 mg and 2 treated with 20 mg) had increased CK > 10 x ULN compared to 0 of 46 patients on placebo.

Myopathy was reported in 2 patients receiving rosuvastatin calcium, one on 10 mg and one on 20 mg. During the 40-week open label titration-to-goal phase of the study (n=173), 122 of 173 patients were titrated to rosuvastatin calcium 20 mg; 4 of the 173 (2.3%) pediatric patients treated with rosuvastatin calcium 20 mg had increased CK > 10 x ULN (with or without muscle symptoms). All patients with CK elevations either continued treatment or resumed treatment after an interruption.

Myalgia was reported in 4 of the 130 (3.0%) pediatric patients treated with rosuvastatin calcium (1 treated with 5 mg, 1 treated with 10 mg and 2 treated with 20 mg) compared with 0 of 46 on placebo in the 12-week double-blind phase. In the 40-week open label titration-to-goal phase, myalgia was reported in 5 of 173 (2.9%) pediatric patients treated with rosuvastatin calcium.

Mean change in ALT and AST values from baseline were slightly higher in the rosuvastatin calcium group versus placebo; however, were not considered to be clinically significant. One patient, experienced an ALT elevation > 3 x ULN which returned to normal subsequent to an interruption in treatment.

Two adverse events of depression were reported in pediatric patients treated with rosuvastatin calcium 20 mg, one of which was determined to be causally related to treatment by the investigator.

Not all adverse reactions that have been identified in the adult populations have been observed in the clinical trials of pediatric patients. However, the same warnings and precautions for use and adverse events in adults also apply to pediatric patients (see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS and ADVERSE REACTIONS).

Post-Market Adverse Drug Reactions

In addition to the events reported above, the following adverse events have been reported during post-marketing experience with rosuvastatin calcium, regardless of causality assessment.

Skeletal muscle effects: Very rare: arthralgia

It has been observed that as with other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, the reporting rate for rhabdomyolysis in post-marketing use is higher at the highest marketed dose (see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS, Muscle Effects).

Hepatobiliary disorders: Very rare: jaundice, hepatitis

Nervous system disorders: Very rare: memory loss

Other: Rare: pancreatitis; Very rare: gynecomastia

The following adverse events have been reported with some statins:

Sleep Disturbances, including insomnia and nightmares.

Mood related disorders including depression.

Cases of erectile dysfunction have been reported in association with the use of statins.

Interstitial lung disease: very rare cases of interstitial lung disease, especially with long term therapy. If it is suspected a patient has developed interstitial lung disease, statin therapy should be discontinued.

DRUG INTERACTIONS

Overview

In rosuvastatin calcium clinical trials there was no evidence of increased skeletal muscle effects when rosuvastatin was dosed with any concomitant therapy. However, NTP-ROSUVASTATIN and other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors may cause dose-related increases in serum transaminases and CK levels. An increase in the incidence of myositis and myopathy has been seen in patients receiving other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors with cyclosporine, fibric acid derivatives (including gemfibrozil), nicotinic acid, azole antifungals and macrolide antibiotics.

Cytochrome P450 Inhibitors

In vitro and in vivo data indicate that rosuvastatin has no clinically significant cytochrome P450 interactions (as substrate, inhibitor or inducer). Consequently, there is little potential for drug-drug interactions upon coadministration with agents that are metabolised by cytochrome P450. Rosuvastatin clearance is not dependent on metabolism by cytochrome P450 3A4 to a clinically significant extent. This has been confirmed in studies with known cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitors (ketoconazole, erythromycin, itraconazole).

Concomitant Therapy with Other Lipid Metabolism Regulators

Co-administration of fenofibrate and rosuvastatin calcium 10 mg did not lead to a clinically significant change in the plasma concentrations of either drug. In addition, neither myopathy nor marked CK elevations ( >10 x ULN) were observed in a study of 128 patients who received rosuvastatin calcium 10, 20 and 40 mg plus extended-release niacin or in a second study of 103 patients who received rosuvastatin calcium 5 and 10 mg plus fenofibrate. Based on the above data, no pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interaction was observed. No data is available with other fibrates.

Based on post-marketing surveillance, gemfibrozil, fenofibrate, other fibrates and lipid lowering doses of niacin (nicotinic acid) may increase the risk of myopathy when given concomitantly with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, probably because they can produce myopathy when given alone (see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS, Muscle Effects, Pre-disposing Factors for Myopathy/Rhabdomyolysis). Therefore, combined drug therapy should be approached with caution.

Protease Inhibitors

Lopinavir/ritonavir

In a pharmacokinetic study, coadministration of rosuvastatin calcium and a combination product of two protease inhibitors (400 mg lopinavir/100 mg ritonavir) in healthy volunteers was associated with an approximately 2-fold and 5-fold increase in rosuvastatin steady-state AUC(0-24) and Cmax respectively.

Increased systemic exposure to rosuvastatin has been observed in subjects receiving rosuvastatin with various protease inhibitors in combination with ritonavir. Consideration should be given both to the benefit of lipid lowering by the use of rosuvastatin in HIV patients receiving protease inhibitors and the potential for increased rosuvastatin plasma concentrations when initiating and up-titrating NTP-ROSUVASTATIN doses in patients treated with protease inhibitors (see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS, Muscle Effects, Pre-disposing Factors for Myopathy/Rhabdomyolysis).

Concomitant Therapies Without Clinically Significant Interactions

Bile Acid Sequestrants: NTP-ROSUVASTATIN can be used in combination with bile acid sequestrant (e.g. cholestyramine).

Ketoconazole: Coadministration of ketoconazole with rosuvastatin calcium resulted in no change in plasma concentrations of rosuvastatin.

Erythromycin: Coadministration of erythromycin with rosuvastatin calcium resulted in small decreases in plasma concentrations of rosuvastatin. These reductions were not considered clinically significant.

Itraconazole: Coadministration of itraconazole with rosuvastatin calcium resulted in a 28% increase in the AUC of rosuvastatin. This small increase was not considered clinically significant.

Fluconazole: Coadministration of fluconazole with rosuvastatin calcium resulted in a 14%
increase in the AUC of rosuvastatin. This small increase was not considered clinically
significant.
Digoxin: Coadministration of digoxin and rosuvastatin calcium did not lead to any clinically
significant interactions.
Other Drugs: Although specific interaction studies were not performed, rosuvastatin calcium
has been studied in over 5300 patients in clinical trials. Many patients were receiving a
variety of medications including antihypertensive agents (beta-adrenergic blocking agents,
calcium channel blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor
blockers and diuretics), antidiabetic agents (biguanides, sulfonylureas, alpha glucosidase
inhibitors, and thiazolidinediones), and hormone replacement therapy without evidence of
clinically significant adverse interactions.
Drug-Drug Interactions
The drugs listed in Table 3 are based on either drug interaction case reports or studies or
potential interactions due to the expected magnitude and seriousness of the interaction (i.e.
those identified as contraindicated).
Table 3 Established or Potential Drug-Drug Interactions
Proper Name

Effect Clinical Comment

Gemfibrozil

Coadministration of a single rosuvastatin dose (10 mg) to healthy volunteers on gemfibrozil (600 mg bid) resulted in a 2.2- and 1.9-fold increase in mean Cmax and mean AUC of rosuvastatin respectively.

Patients taking this combination should not exceed a dose of

NTP-ROSUVASTATIN 20 mg once daily and the concomitant use of NTP-ROSUVASTATIN 40 mg once daily is contraindicated Coumarin

Anticoagulants

As with other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, coadministration of NTP-ROSUVASTATIN and coumarin (e.g. warfarin) may result in a rise in International Normalized Ratio (INR) compared to coumarin alone. In healthy subjects, the coadministration of rosuvastatin 40 mg (10 days) and warfarin 25 mg (single dose) produced a higher mean maxINR and AUC-INR than achieved with warfarin alone. Coadministration of rosuvastatin 10 and 80 mg to patients on stable warfarin therapy resulted in clinically significant rises in INR (> 4, baseline 2-3). The mechanism for this effect is unknown, but is likely due to a pharmacodynamic interaction with warfarin rather than a pharmacokinetic interaction as no relevant differences in the pharmacokinetics of either drug were observed.

In patients taking coumarin, monitoring of INR is recommended at initiation or cessation of therapy with rosuvastatin or following dose adjustment.

Rosuvastatin therapy has not been associated with bleeding or changes in INR in patients not taking anticoagulants.

Proper Name

Effect Clinical Comment

Antacids

Simultaneous dosing of rosuvastatin calcium with an antacid suspension containing aluminium and magnesium hydroxide resulted in a decrease of rosuvastatin plasma concentration by approximately 50%.

The clinical relevance of this interaction has not been studied. However, the effect was mitigated when the antacid was dosed 2 hours after rosuvastatin calcium. This interaction should not be clinically relevant in patients using this type of antacid infrequently. A frequent antacid user should be instructed to take NTP-ROSUVASTATIN at a time of day when they are less likely to need the antacid Oral Contraceptives

When rosuvastatin calcium 40 mg was coadministered with a representative oral contraceptive (ethinyl estradiol [35 μg] and norgestrel [180 μg on days 1 to 7, 215 μg on days 8 to 15, and 250 μg on days 16 to 21]) no reduction in contraceptive efficacy was observed. An increase in plasma concentrations (AUC) of ethinyl estradiol (26%) and norgestrel (34%) occurred

These increased plasma levels should be considered when selecting oral contraceptive doses.

Immunosuppressants (Including

Cyclosporine)

Rosuvastatin calcium 10 and 20 mg were administered to cardiac transplant patients (at least 6 months post-transplant) whose concomitant medication included cyclosporine, prednisone and azathioprine. Results showed that cyclosporine pharmacokinetics were not affected by rosuvastatin. However, cyclosporine did increase the systemic exposure of rosuvastatin by 11-fold (Cmax) and 7-fold (AUC [0-24]) compared with historical data in healthy individuals.

The concomitant use of NTP-ROSUVASTATIN and cyclosporine is

contraindicated (see

CONTRAINDICATIONS).

Drug-drug interaction studies have not been performed in pediatric patients (boys and girls
who are at least one year post-menarche, 10 to 17 years of age) with heterozygous familial
hypercholesterolemia.
Drug-Food Interactions
NTP-ROSUVASTATIN can be taken with or without food (see DOSAGE AND
ADMINISTRATION).

DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION

Patients should be placed on a standard cholesterol-lowering diet (at least equivalent to the
Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP III TLC diet)) before receiving NTP-ROSUVASTATIN

(rosuvastatin calcium), and should continue on this diet during treatment with NTP-ROSUVASTATIN. If appropriate, a program of weight control and physical exercise should be implemented.

Prior to initiating therapy with NTP-ROSUVASTATIN, secondary causes for elevations in plasma lipid levels should be excluded. A lipid profile should also be performed.

NTP-ROSUVASTATIN may be taken in the morning or evening, with or without food. Recommended Dose and Dosage Adjustment

Adults

Hypercholesterolemia

The dose range of NTP-ROSUVASTATIN is 5 to 40 mg orally once a day. The recommended starting dose of NTP-ROSUVASTATIN in most patients is 10 mg orally once daily. The majority of patients are controlled at the 10 mg dose. If necessary, dose adjustment can be made at 2-4 week intervals. The maximum response is usually achieved within 2-4 weeks and is maintained during chronic therapy.

Initiation of therapy with NTP-ROSUVASTATIN 5 mg once daily may be considered for patients requiring less aggressive LDL-C reductions or who have predisposing factors for myopathy (see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS, Muscle Effects).

Patients who are switched to NTP-ROSUVASTATIN from treatment with another HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor should be started on 10 mg even if they were on a high dose of the previous HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor. A switch dose of 20 mg may be considered for patients with severe hypercholesterolemia.

For patients with severe hypercholesterolemia (including those with familial hypercholesterolemia), a 20 mg start dose may be considered. These patients should be carefully followed.

A dose of 40 mg once daily should only be used in patients with severe hypercholesterolemia who do not achieve the desired effect on 20 mg and have no predisposing factors for myopathy/rhabdomyolysis (see CONTRAINDICATIONS). Consultation with a specialist is recommended when initiating NTP-ROSUVASTATIN 40 mg dose.

The dosage of NTP-ROSUVASTATIN should be individualized according to baseline LDL-C, total C/HDL-C ratio and/or TG levels to achieve the recommended desired lipid values at the lowest possible dose.

Prevention of Major Cardiovascular Events

A dose of 20 mg once daily has been found to reduce the risk of major cardiovascular events (see CLINICAL TRIALS).

Dosing Considerations in Special Populations

Patients with Hepatic Impairment:

The usual dose range applies in patients with mild to moderate hepatic impairment. Increased
systemic exposure has been observed in patients with severe hepatic impairment and,
therefore, in these patients the dose of NTP-ROSUVASTATIN should not exceed 20 mg
once daily (see CONTRAINDICATIONS and WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS,
Hepatic/Biliary/Pancreatic, Hepatic Impairment).
Patients with Renal Impairment:
The usual dose range applies in patients with mild to moderate renal impairment. Increased
systemic exposure to rosuvastatin has been observed in patients with severe renal impairment.
For patients with severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2) the
starting dose of NTP-ROSUVASTATIN should be 5 mg and not exceed 10 mg once daily
(see CONTRAINDICATIONS and WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS, Renal, Renal
Impairment).
Race:
The initial dose of NTP-ROSUVASTATIN, in Asian patients should be 5 mg once daily. The
potential for increases in systemic exposure must be considered when making treatment
decisions. The maximum dose should not exceed NTP-ROSUVASTATIN 20 mg once daily
(see CONTRAINDICATIONS and WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS, Special
Populations, Race).
Pediatrics (10 – 17 years of age):
In pediatric patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia the recommended
starting dose of NTP-ROSUVASTATIN calcium is 5 mg taken orally once daily. The NTP-
ROSUVASTATIN calcium dose should be individualized according to baseline LDL-C levels
and the recommended goal of therapy. The maximum daily dose in this patient population is
10 mg.
The safety and efficacy of rosuvastatin calcium doses greater than 20 mg have not been
studied in this population.
Treatment experience with rosuvastatin calcium in pediatric patients (aged 8 years and above)
with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia is limited to 8 patients. Use in this patient
population should be supervised by specialists (see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS,
Special Populations, Pediatrics).
Use in Elderly:
No dose adjustment is necessary in the elderly (see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS,
Special Populations, Geriatrics).
Concomitant Therapy:
See WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS and DRUG INTERACTIONS.

OVERDOSAGE

There is no specific treatment in the event of overdosage. Should an overdose occur, the
patient should be treated symptomatically and supportive measures instituted as required.
Hemodialysis does not significantly enhance clearance of rosuvastatin.

For the management of a suspected drug overdose, contact your regional Poison Control Centre.

ACTION AND CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY

Mechanism of Action

NTP-ROSUVASTATIN (rosuvastatin calcium) is a synthetic, enantiomerically pure lipid-lowering agent. It is a selective, potent and competitive inhibitor of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase. This enzyme catalyses the conversion of HMG-CoA to mevalonate, which is an early and rate-limiting step in cholesterol biosynthesis.

Studies have shown that rosuvastatin calcium lowers plasma cholesterol and lipoprotein levels by inhibiting HMG-CoA reductase and cholesterol synthesis in the liver by increasing the number of hepatic Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) receptors on the cell-surface for enhanced uptake and catabolism of LDL. Additionally, rosuvastatin inhibits the hepatic synthesis of Very Low Density Lipoprotein (VLDL), thereby reducing the total number of VLDL and LDL particles.

Pharmacodynamics

Epidemiologic, clinical and experimental studies have established that high LDL-C, low HDL-C and high plasma TG promote human atherosclerosis and are risk factors for developing cardiovascular disease. Some studies have also shown that the total-C/HDL-C ratio is the best predictor of coronary artery disease. In contrast, increased levels of HDL-C are associated with decreased cardiovascular risk. Drug therapies that reduce levels of LDL-C or decrease TG while simultaneously increasing HDL-C have demonstrated reductions in rates of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity.

See also DETAILED PHARMACOLOGY- Human Pharmacology.

Pharmacokinetics

Absorption:

NTP-ROSUVASTATIN is administered orally following which rosuvastatin, the active moiety, is rapidly absorbed, reaching peak plasma concentration 3 to 5 hours after dosing.

Both peak concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) increase in proportion to rosuvastatin dose. The absolute bioavailability of rosuvastatin is approximately 20% and there is no accumulation on repeated dosing. NTP-ROSUVASTATIN may be given with or without food. Administration in the morning or evening did not affect the rate and extent of absorption nor the ability of rosuvastatin to reduce LDL-C.

Distribution:

Rosuvastatin undergoes first pass extraction in the liver, which is the primary site of cholesterol synthesis and LDL-C clearance. The mean volume of distribution at steady state of rosuvastatin is approximately 134 litres. Rosuvastatin is approximately 90% bound to plasma

proteins, mostly albumin. This binding is reversible and independent of plasma concentrations.

Metabolism:

Rosuvastatin is not extensively metabolised with approximately 10% of a radio labeled dose recovered as metabolite. The major metabolite is N-desmethyl rosuvastatin, which is formed principally by cytochrome P450 2C9, and in in vitro studies has demonstrated to have approximately one-half the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitory activity of rosuvastatin. The parent compound accounts for greater than 87% of the circulating active HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor activity.

Excretion:

Following an oral dose, rosuvastatin and its metabolites are primarily excreted in the faeces (90%) with the remainder being excreted in the urine. Fecal recovery represents absorbed drug, metabolites in the bile, and unabsorbed drug. The elimination half-life (t½) of rosuvastatin is approximately 19 hours and does not increase with increasing doses.

Special Populations and Conditions:

Pediatrics (10 – 17 years of age):

There was no clinically relevant effect of age or sex on the pharmacokinetics of rosuvastatin in adults. The pharmacokinetics of rosuvastatin in pediatric patients 10 to 17 years of age with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia was similar to that of adult volunteers. Following single dose administration of rosuvastatin calcium 10 mg, the Cmax values in two studies of healthy adult volunteers were 5.8 ng/mL (n=12) and 3.8 ng/mL (n=18) compared to 6.3 ng/mL (n=6) in pediatric patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. The AUC(0-t) values in healthy adult volunteers were 45.9 ng·h/mL (n=12) and 31.6 ng·h/mL (n=18) compared to 52.2 ng·h/mL in pediatric patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia.

Race:

A population pharmacokinetic analysis revealed no clinically relevant differences in pharmacokinetics among Caucasian, Hispanic and Black or Afro-Caribbean groups. However, pharmacokinetic studies with rosuvastatin, including one conducted in North America, have demonstrated an approximate 2-fold elevation in median exposure (AUC and Cmax) in Asian subjects when compared with a Caucasian control group (see CONTRAINDICATIONS and WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS, Special Populations, Race and DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION, Race).

Primary dysbetalipoproteinemia (Fredrickson Type III hyperlipoproteinemia) In a randomized, multicenter, double-blind crossover study, 32 patients (27 with ε2/ε2 genotype and 4 with apo E mutation [Arg145Cys]) with dysbetalipoproteinemia (Fredrickson Type III) received rosuvastatin calcium 10 or 20 mg daily for 6 weeks. Rosuvastatin calcium 10 and 20 mg reduced non-HDL-C (primary end point) by 48% (95% CI: 45.6, 56.7) and 56% (95% CI: 48.5, 61.4), respectively. Rosuvastatin calcium 10 and 20 mg respectively, also reduced Total-C (43% and 48%), TG (40% and 43%), VLDL-C + IDL-C (47% and 56%), LDL-C (54% and 57%), Remnant Lipoprotein Cholesterol (56% and 65%), Apo E

(43% and 43%) and increased HDL-C (10% and 11%). The effect of rosuvastatin calcium on
morbidity and mortality in this patient population has not been studied.

STORAGE AND STABILITY

Store between 15°C and 30°C. Keep container tightly closed. Protect from Moisture.

DOSAGE FORMS, COMPOSITION AND PACKAGING

Dosage Forms and Packaging
NTP-ROSUVASTATIN (rosuvastatin calcium) is available in tablets of 5 mg, 10 mg, 20 mg
and 40 mg.
5 mg: Round, biconvex, yellow coloured, film-coated tablet embossed with ‘R’ over
‘114’ on one side and ‘rph’ on the other side. Available in bottles of 30, 100,
and 500 tablets and blisters of 16 and 30 tablets.
10 mg: Round, biconvex, pink coloured, film-coated tablet embossed with ‘R’ over
‘113’ on one side and ‘rph’ on the other side. Available in bottles of 30, 100,
and 500 tablets and blisters of 16 and 30 tablets.
20 mg: Round, biconvex, pink coloured, film-coated tablet embossed with ‘R’ over
‘112’ on one side and ‘rph’ on the other side. Available in bottles of 30, 100,
and 500 tablets and blisters of 16 and 30 tablets.
40 mg: Oval, biconvex, pink coloured, film-coated tablet embossed with ‘R111’ on
one side and ‘rph’ on the other side. Available in bottles of 30, 100, and 500
tablets and blisters of 16 tablets.
Composition
Each tablet contains 5, 10, 20 or 40 mg of rosuvastatin as rosuvastatin calcium. Each tablet
also contains the following non-medicinal ingredients: crospovidone, hydroxypropyl
cellulose, lactose monohydrate, microcrystalline cellulose, magnesium stearate and sodium
bicarbonate. Coating Ingredients include iron oxide yellow (5 mg tablets), iron oxide red (10
mg, 20 mg and 40 mg tablets), hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose, lactose monohydrate,
titanium dioxide and triacetin.

PART II: SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION

PHARMACEUTICAL INFORMATION

Drug Substance
Proper name: rosuvastatin calcium
Chemical name: bis [(E)-7-[4-(4-fluorophenyl)-6-isopropyl-2-[methyl
(methylsulfonyl)amino]pyrimidin-5-yl](3R,5S)-3,5-dihydroxyhept- 6-
enoic acid] calcium salt

Molecular formula and molecular mass: (C22H27FN3O6S)2 Ca and 1001.14

Structural formula:

Physicochemical properties:

Rosuvastatin calcium is a white, off-white to yellow coloured powder that is sparingly soluble in water and methanol, and slightly soluble in ethanol.

CLINICAL TRIALS

Comparative Bioavailability Studies

A single dose, blinded, randomized, 2-way crossover bioequivalence study of NTP-ROSUVASTATIN 20 mg tablets and Crestor®

20 mg Tablets administered at 1 x 20 mg in 31 healthy male volunteers was conducted under fasting conditions. The results indicate that NTP-ROSUVASTATIN 20 mg is bioequivalent to 20 mg Crestor®

. The summary of results is presented in the following table:

Rosuvastatin
(1 x 20 mg)
From measured data
Geometric Mean
Arithmetic Mean (CV %)
Parameter

Test: NTP-ROSUVASTATIN*

20 mg Tablet

Reference: Crestor®† 20 mg Tablet% Ratio of Geometric Means**

90% Confidence

Interval

AUC0-T

(ng·h/mL)

74.08

82.09 (43%)

72.31

80.29 (43%)

102.4695.63 – 109.77

AUCinf

(ng·h/mL)

77.94

85.72 (42%)

75.35

83.43 (46%)

103.4496.94 – 110.38

Cmax

(ng/mL)

88.33 9.86 (46%)86.27 9.66 (49%)102.3994.76 – 110.63

Tmax§

(h)

4.19 (2.00 – 5.50)3.80 (1.00 – 5.00)

T½ #

(h)

18.36 (36.10)17.85 (32.34)

* Test product: NTP-ROSUVASTATIN 20 mg Tablets, manufactured by Teva Canada Ltd. † Reference product: Crestor® 20 mg Tablets (manufactured by AstraZeneca), purchased in Canada. § Expressed as the median (min-max)

** Based on least square estimate

# Arithmetic Mean (CV%) only

A single dose, blinded, randomized, 2-way crossover bioequivalence study of NTP-ROSUVASTATIN 40 mg tablets and Crestor®

40 mg Tablets administered at 1 x 40 mg in 30 healthy male volunteers was conducted under fasting conditions. The results indicate that NTP-ROSUVASTATIN 40 mg is bioequivalent to 40 mg Crestor®

. The summary of results is presented in the following table:

Rosuvastatin
(1 x 40 mg)
From measured data
Geometric Mean
Arithmetic Mean (CV %)
Parameter

Test: NTP-ROSUVASTATIN*

40 mg Tablet

Reference: Crestor®† 40 mg Tablet% Ratio of Geometric Means**

90% Confidence

Interval

AUC0-T

(ng·h/mL)

137.13 150.04 (43%)142.95 156.65 (44%)95.9489.50 – 102.84
Rosuvastatin
(1 x 40 mg)
From measured data
Geometric Mean
Arithmetic Mean (CV %)
Parameter

Test: NTP-ROSUVASTATIN*

40 mg Tablet

Reference: Crestor®† 40 mg Tablet% Ratio of Geometric Means**

90% Confidence

Interval

AUCinf

(ng·h/mL)

144.63 157.86 (41%)151.50 165.11 (41%)95.4688.94 – 102.46

Cmax

(ng/mL)

141.96 159.13 (52%)147.99 170.12 (56%)95.9285.91 – 107.11

Tmax§

(h)

4.31 (1.00 – 5.00)4.41 (1.00 – 5.00)

T½ #

(h)

17.59 (49.70)16.98 (38.04)

* Test product: NTP-ROSUVASTATIN 40 mg Tablets, manufactured by Teva Canada Ltd. † Reference product: Crestor® 40 mg Tablets (manufactured by AstraZeneca), purchased in Canada. § Expressed as the median (min-max)

** Based on least square estimate
# Arithmetic Mean (CV%) only
Hypercholesterolemia

Adults

The lowering of total cholesterol, LDL-C, Total-C/HDL-C ratio and ApoB has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events and mortality.

Rosuvastatin calcium has been shown to significantly improve lipid profiles in patients with a variety of dyslipidemic conditions. Rosuvastatin calcium is highly effective in reducing total-C and LDL-C, TG and ApoB and increasing HDL-C in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia (with and without hypertriglyceridemia), familial and non-familial hypercholesterolemia, mixed hyperlipidemia, and in patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). Rosuvastatin calcium also lowers the LDL-C/HDL-C, Total-C/HDL-C, nonHDL-C/HDL-C and the ApoB/ApoA-I ratios.

The following reductions in total cholesterol, LDL-C, TG, Total-C/HDL-C and increases in HDL-C have been observed in a dose-response study and may serve as a guide to treatment of patients with mild to moderate hypercholesterolemia:

Table 4 Dose-Response in Patients with Mild to Moderate Hypercholesterolemia (Mean Percent

Change from Baseline) Rosuvastatin

Calcium Dose

(mg/day)

N Total-C LDL-C TG HDL-C Total-C

/HDL-C

Apo B

Placebo 13 -5 -7 -3 3 -8 -3 5 17 -33 -45 -35 13 -41 -38 10 17 -36 -52 -10 14 -43 -42 20 17 -40 -55 -23 8 -44 -46 40 18 -46 -63 -28 10 -51 -54

Dose-Ranging Studies
In clinical trials, rosuvastatin calcium (5 to 40 mg/day) corrected lipid abnormalities in a wide
variety of hyperlipidemic and dyslipidemic conditions.
In one multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose range study in patients with mild to
moderate hypercholesterolemia (Fredrickson Types IIa and IIb), rosuvastatin calcium (given as
a single daily dose for 6 weeks) significantly reduced the levels of Total-C (33-46%), LDL-C
(45-63%), Total-C/HDL-C (41-51%), ApoB (38-54%), TG (10-35%) , and increased HDL-C
levels (8-14%) across the dose range. Approximately 60% of the LDL-C reduction at 6 weeks
was attained within 1 week and 90% of the LDL-C reduction was attained within the first 2
weeks after the beginning of therapy.
Pediatrics (10 – 17 years of age)
In a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 12-week study (n=176, 97 male and
79 female) followed by a 40-week (n=173, 96 male and 77 female), open label, titration-
to-goal phase, patients 10-17 years of age (Tanner stage II-V, females at least 1 year post-
menarche) with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia1 received rosuvastatin
calcium 5, 10 or 20 mg or placebo daily for 12 weeks and then all received rosuvastatin
calcium daily for 40 weeks. At study entry, approximately 30% of the patients were 10-
13 years and approximately 17%, 18%, 40%, and 25% were Tanner stage II, III, IV, and
V respectively.
The majority of pediatric patients, who met the study inclusion criteria, had a baseline
LDL-C ≥ 4.9 mmol/L or LDL-C > 4.1 mmol/L and a positive family history of premature
cardiovascular disease.
Rosuvastatin calcium significantly reduced LDL-C, total cholesterol and ApoB levels
during the 12-week double-blind phase. Results are shown in Table 5.
Table 5: Lipid-modifying effects of Rosuvastatin Calcium in pediatric patients with
heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (least-squares mean percent change from
baseline to week 12)
rosuvastatinNLDL-C *HDL-CTotal-C *TGNon-ApoB *ApoA-1
CalciumHDL-C *
Dose (mg/day)
Placebo46-0.76.9-0.05.1-0.9-1.72.8
542-38.34.2-29.90.3-36.1-31.71.8
1044-44.611.2-34.2-13.6-43.0-38.15.4
2044-50.08.9-38.7-8.1-47.5-40.74.0
* p < 0.001 vs. placebo for all rosuvastatin calcium doses.
_______________________________

1 Defined as documented genetic defect in LDL receptor or ApoB by DNA analysis or documented evidence of familial hypercholesterolemia in a first-degree relative (i.e. LDL-C > 4.9 mmol/L in an adult not receiving a statin or LDL-C > 2.5 mmol/L in an adult receiving a statin; LDL-C > 4.1 mmol/L in a child < 18 years of age not receiving a statin or LDL > 2.1 mmol/L in a child < 18 years of age receiving a statin).

At the end of the 12-week double-blind phase, 12%, 41% and 41% of patients treated with
rosuvastatin calcium 5, 10 and 20 mg, respectively, achieved an LDL-C of less than 2.8
mmol/L (110 mg/dL).
At the end of the 40-week, open label, titration to goal phase, dosing up to a maximum of 20
mg once daily, 70 of 173 patients (40.5%) had achieved an LDL-C of less than 2.8 mmol/L
(110 mg/dL).
The long term efficacy of rosuvastatin calcium therapy in the treatment of pediatric patients
has not been studied and has therefore not been demonstrated to reduce mortality or morbidity
in adulthood.
During the 12-week double-blind phase, 4 of 130 (3.0%) pediatric patients treated with
rosuvastatin calcium (2 treated with 10 mg and 2 treated with 20 mg) had increased CK > 10 x
ULN compared to 0 of 46 patients on placebo. Myopathy was reported in 2 patients receiving
rosuvastatin calcium, one on 10 mg and one on 20 mg. During the 40-week open label
titration-to-goal phase of the study, 122 of 173 patients were titrated to rosuvastatin calcium
20 mg; 4 of the 173 (2.3%) pediatric patients treated with rosuvastatin calcium 20 mg had
increased CK > 10 x ULN (with or without muscle symptoms). All patients with CK
elevations either continued treatment or resumed treatment after an interruption.
Myalgia was reported in 4 of the 130 (3.0%) pediatric patients treated with rosuvastatin
calcium (1 treated with 5 mg, 1 treated with 10 mg and 2 treated with 20 mg) compared with 0
of 46 on placebo in the 12-week placebo-controlled phase. In the 40-week open label titration-
to-goal phase, myalgia was reported in 5 of 173 (2.9%) pediatric patients treated with
rosuvastatin calcium.
After 52 weeks of study treatment, although endocrinology function, such as hormone
disturbances, was not assessed, no effect on growth or sexual maturation was detected (see
WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS, Special Populations, Pediatrics).
Prevention of Major Cardiovascular Events
In the JUPITER study (Justification for the Use of Statins in Primary Prevention: An
Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin) 89,846 people with no pre-existing
cardiovascular disease were screened and 17,802 (19.8%) were double-blindly
randomized to rosuvastatin calcium 20 mg once daily (n=8901) or placebo (n=8901).
Patients were followed for a median duration of 1.9 years. The main reasons for
exclusion of patients were due to LDL-C ≥ 3.3 mmol/L (52%) or high sensitivity C-
reactive protein (hsCRP) < 2 mg/L (36%). The study population consisted of 11,001 men
(≥ 50 years) and 6801 women (≥ 60 years) without history of cardiovascular disease,
LDL-C levels < 3.3 mmol/L and hsCRP levels ≥ 2 mg/L. Approximately 50% of the
patients had an intermediate (10-20%) Framingham risk category and less than 10%
were in the Framingham high (> 20%) risk category. It also included a high percentage
of patients with additional risk factors such as hypertension (58%), low HDL-C levels
(23%), cigarette smoking (16%), a family history of premature coronary heart disease
(CHD) (12%) or prediabetes (31%). Most had two (49%) or three (22%) coronary risk
factors at baseline. The JUPITER study was stopped early by the Data Safety
Monitoring Board due to meeting predefined stopping rules for efficacy in rosuvastatin
calcium-treated subjects.
The primary endpoint was a composite consisting of the time-to-first occurrence of any of the
following cardiovascular events: cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction,
nonfatal stroke, unstable angina or an arterial revascularization procedure.
Treatment with rosuvastatin calcium significantly reduced the risk of cardiovascular events
(p<0.001). When the study was prematurely terminated (median follow-up of 1.9 years and
maximal follow-up of 5 years), 142 events in the rosuvastatin calcium group and 252 events in
the placebo group had occurred for a relative risk reduction of 44% and absolute risk
reduction of 1.23% (see Figure 1). The benefit was apparent within the first 6 months of
treatment (p=0.029).
Figure 1 Time to First Occurrence of Major Cardiovascular Events
The results of the primary composite endpoint and the individual components are presented in
Table 6. Rosuvastatin calcium significantly reduced the risk of nonfatal myocardial infarction
(p < 0.0001), nonfatal stroke (p=0.004) and arterial revascularization procedures (p=0.034).
There were no statistically significant treatment differences between the rosuvastatin calcium
and placebo groups for death due to cardiovascular causes or hospitalizations for unstable
angina.
Table 6 Number of First Events by Treatment Group for the Composite Primary
Endpoint (ITT population)

Rosuvastatin

Calcium N = 8901 n (%)

Placebo

N= 8901

n (%)

Relative risk Reduction** (95% CI)

Absolute

Risk

Reduction

(%)

1.9 year NNT

PRIMARY (composite)

ENDPOINT

142 (1.6)

252 (2.83) 44% (31, 54) 1.23 81

Cardiovascular death* 29 (0.33) 37 (0.42)

22% (-27, 52)

0.09

1112

Nonfatal stroke 30 (0.34) 57 (0.64)

48% (18, 66)

0.30

329

Rosuvastatin

Calcium N = 8901 n (%)

Placebo N= 8901 n (%)

Relative risk Reduction** (95% CI)

Absolute
Risk
Reduction
(%)

1.9 year NNT

Nonfatal MI

21 (0.24) 61 (0.69) 66% (44, 79)

0.45

222

Unstable angina

15 (0.17) 27 (0.30) 45% (-4, 71)

0.13

741

Arterial
revascularization

47 (0.53) 70 (0.79) 33% (3, 54)

0.26

387

* Cardiovascular death included fatal MI, fatal stroke, sudden death, and other adjudicated causes of CV

death,

** Negative numbers imply a risk increase,

CI Confidence interval, ITT Intent-to-treat, MI myocardial infarction, NNT number needed to treat.

rosuvastatin calcium significantly reduced the risk of the combined secondary endpoint of
fatal and nonfatal myocardial infarction (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.30-0.70, p<0.0002) (6 fatal
events and 62 nonfatal events in placebo treated subjects versus 9 fatal events and 22
nonfatal events in rosuvastatin calcium -treated subjects) and the risk of the combined
secondary endpoint of fatal and nonfatal stroke (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.34-0.79, p=0.002) (6
fatal events and 58 nonfatal events in placebo-treated subjects versus 3 fatal events and 30
nonfatal events in rosuvastatin calcium-treated subjects).
Risk reduction observed was as a rule similar across multiple predefined population subsets
based on age, gender, race, smoking status, family history of premature CHD, body mass
index, LDL-C, HDL-C, serum triglyceride, fasting glucose level (< 5.6 mM and ≥ 5.6 mM),
metabolic syndrome, or hsCRP levels (above and below the median 4.2 mg/L) at the time of
entry into the study.

DETAILED PHARMACOLOGY

Human Pharmacology
Rosuvastatin calcium decreases elevated total cholesterol (Total-C), LDL-C, TG and increases
HDL-C in patients with homozygous and heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH),
nonfamilial forms of hypercholesterolemia and mixed dyslipidemia. In these patients
rosuvastatin calcium also lowers Apolipoprotein B, nonHDL-C, VLDL-C, VLDL-TG, the
LDL-C/HDL-C, Total- C/HDL-C, nonHDL-C/HDL-C, ApoB/ApoA-I ratios and increases
ApoA-I.
A therapeutic response to rosuvastatin calcium is evident within 1 week after initiation of
therapy and 90% of the maximum response is usually obtained after 2 weeks. The maximum
response is generally attained in 4 weeks and has been maintained in clinical trial patients
followed-up for up to 1 year.
Animal Pharmacology
Rosuvastatin was shown to be an inhibitor of HMG-CoA reductase in microsomes isolated
from rat and human liver. Like other statins, the inhibition was competitive with HMG-CoA
and non-competitive with NADPH. Using a cloned fragment of human HMG-CoA reductase,
representing the catalytic domain, the estimated inhibition constant (Ki) for rosuvastatin was
0.1 nM. Inhibition of the catalytic domain was also found to be competitive with HMG-CoA
and non-competitive with NADPH. Of the metabolites of rosuvastatin that have been detected

in humans and animal species, only N-desmethyl rosuvastatin demonstrated notable inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase and was found to be 2 to 7-fold less potent than the parent compound.

Using primary preparations of hepatocytes, rosuvastatin was found to inhibit cholesterol synthesis from acetate, with an IC50 about 7-fold lower than the nearest comparator, atorvastatin and 40-fold lower than pravastatin. Rosuvastatin did not inhibit synthesis of cholesterol from mevalonate (the product of HMG-CoA reductase), indicating no effect on the enzymes of the sterol pathway downstream from HMG-CoA reductase. Compared to a variety of non-hepatic cells including human myoblasts, rosuvastatin was found to be highly selective for action in hepatocytes. Studies of the initial uptake rates of rosuvastatin into rat hepatocytes defined a high affinity component of uptake with a Km of 9 mM. In addition, compared to other statins, rosuvastatin exhibited low rates of metabolism by cytochrome P450-dependent enzymes. The comparatively high potency of effect of rosuvastatin in hepatocytes may result from a combination of high affinity for the enzyme active site, active transport, and low rates of metabolism. The high degree of selectivity for action of the compound in liver cells is consistent with its octanol:water partition and with evidence of active transport into hepatocytes.

Rosuvastatin was shown to inhibit hepatic cholesterol synthesis after oral administration to the rat, with 50 to 80% inhibition of liver HMG-CoA reductase achieved at doses between 1 and 5 mg/kg. The uptake of rosuvastatin from plasma was higher into liver than any other tissue and the peak of inhibition in liver after oral dosing coincided with the peak of plasma rosuvastatin levels. There was evidence of a relatively long duration of action on liver cholesterol synthesis by rosuvastatin compared with other statins.

In the dog, plasma mevalonate levels were rapidly reduced after oral administration of rosuvastatin. The dose required for half maximal reduction of mevalonate measured at 4 hours post-dose, was similar to the dose required to inhibit hepatic cholesterol by 50% in the rat. When 3 mg/kg was administered to dogs once daily for 14 days, rosuvastatin progressively reduced total cholesterol levels by up to 26%. Stable cholesterol-lowering effects were also observed on oral administration of doses of 0.03 to 0.1 mg/kg of rosuvastatin to the dog for three months. In addition, rosuvastatin has been shown to reduce serum cholesterol and lipoprotein levels in the Cynomolgus monkey. Rosuvastatin dose-dependently reduced VLDL and LDL in two strains of hyperlipidemic transgenic mice and reduced VLDL production rates. In the genetically hyperlipidemic WHHL rabbit, rosuvastatin reduced Total and LDL-cholesterol and reduced the extent and degree of atherosclerotic lesions in the aorta.

The effects of rosuvastatin observed in vitro and in the animal models are consistent with inhibition of hepatic HMG-CoA reductase as the primary mode of action.

TOXICOLOGY

Acute Toxicity

Rosuvastatin was shown to be of low acute toxicity following administration of single doses to rats and dogs by oral and intravenous routes. There were no mortalities in rats given an oral dose of 1000 mg/kg or 2000 mg/kg, and other than depression of bodyweight at 2000 mg/kg, there were no treatment-related effects at either dose level. Dogs received oral doses of 1000

mg/kg or 2000 mg/kg with vomiting on the day of dosing observed as the major clinical finding in both sexes. Biochemical changes (increased plasma enzymes, decreased lipids) and hematological change (increased white blood cells) were found in dogs given an oral dose of up to and including 2000 mg/kg. Lethality was observed immediately after dosing in 1/1 of rats given an intravenous dose of 500 mg/kg but two rats given 250 mg/kg intravenously showed slight hypopnea and weakness soon after dosing with no subsequent effects. The results are summarized below:

Table 7 Acute Oral and Intravenous Toxicity Studies with Rosuvastatin

Species Route Dose Levels for One or

Both Sexes (mg/kg)

Mortalities

Rat Oral 1000 and 2000 0/1 at 1000 mg/kg;

0/2 at 2000 mg/kg Rat Intravenous 250 and 500 1/1 died at 500 mg/kg;

0/2 at 250 mg/kg Rat Oral 1000 and 2000 0/12 at 1000 mg/kg;

0/12 at 2000 mg/kg Dog Oral 1000 and 2000 0/2 at 1000 mg/kg;

0/2 at 2000 mg/kg

Subacute and Chronic Toxicity

The significant target organs affected by rosuvastatin in multiple dose toxicity studies in rats (14 days to 6 months), mice (2 weeks to 13 weeks), Cynomolgus monkeys (30 days to 6 months), dogs (14 days to 12 months) and rabbits (developmental toxicity study) are summarized in Table 8 below.

Table 8 Rosuvastatin: Target Organs Affected in Animal Studies

MouseRatCynomolgus MonkeyDogRabbit
Liver - increasedLiver - increasedTestis - reducedLiver – increased liver-Skeletal Muscle -
weight andweight, eosinophilia,spermatogenicrelated plasmafocal degeneration
centrilobularperiportal necrosis andepithelium withenzymesand necrosis of
hypertrophyintralobular bile ductvacuolationperivascular
hypertrophy, increasedmyocardium and other
liver-related plasmaskeletal muscle tissue
enzymes
Stomach (non-Stomach (non-Kidney - corticalGallbladder -
glandular)**-glandular)** -tubular epithelial cellhemorrhage, edema
hyperplasia ofhyperplasia ofnecrosis withand/or inflammatory
squamous epitheliumsquamous epitheliumregenerationcell infiltrate in lamina
and hyperkeratosis ofand hyperkeratosis ofpropria mucosa
forestomach mucosaforestomach mucosa
Gall bladder* -Lens*** - punctate or
hemorrhage, edemastriate opacities in
and/or inflammatoryanterior portion of the
cell infiltration inlens
lamina propria mucosa
MouseRatCynomolgus MonkeyDogRabbit
Brain* - edema,
hemorrhage and partial
necrosis in choroid
plexus
Testis - tubular
degeneration and
atrophy

*Occurred after administration of high, intolerable doses (250 mg/kg/day [mouse gall bladder], 90 mg/kg/day [dog brain]

**Unique anatomical structure not relevant to human

***Not a consequence of prolonged dosing

Table 9 summarizes the significant adverse changes observed during chronic toxicology studies in the mouse (104 weeks), rat (6 months), dog (12 months), Cynomolgus monkey (6 months) and rabbit (developmental toxicity study).

Table 9 Rosuvastatin: Significant Adverse Changes in Subacute and Chronic Studies Margin vs. NOAEL: 40 mg

Species/ Finding No-Effect

Dose

(mg/kg/day)

Minimal Toxic

Dose

(mg/kg/day)

CmaxAUC
(adjusted for(adjusted for
protein bindingprotein binding)
(ng/mL)(ng•h/mL)

Mouse

Liver carcinoma 60 200 19 4.9

Rat

Forestomach

hyperkeratosis

>20 >20 12 4

Plasma liver

enzymes

>20 >20 12 4

Hepatocellular

necrosis

2 6 0.44 0.3

Muscle necrosis 80 (2 yr study) 80 (13 wk study) 26 6.5

Uterine polyps 60 80 23 5

Dog

Plasma liver

enzymes

3 6 3.9 4

Hepatocellular

atrophy

3 6 3.9 4

Gall bladder

edema and

3 6 3.9 4

Margin vs. NOAEL: 40 mg

Species/ Finding No-Effect

Dose

(mg/kg/day)

Minimal Toxic

Dose

(mg/kg/day)

CmaxAUC
(adjusted for(adjusted for
protein bindingprotein binding)
(ng/mL)(ng•h/mL)

hemorrhage

Ocular opacity 15 30 19 2.4

Testicular tubular

degeneration

30 90 33 20

Monkey

Testicular tubular

degeneration

10 30 2.3 4

Renal tubular

necrosis

10 30 2.3 4

Rabbit

Muscle Necrosis 1* 3* 0.2** Not Available

*rabbit teratology study

**exposure determined in a separate toxicokinetic study

The toxicology profile of rosuvastatin appears similar to that observed with other statins and is a consequence of its primary pharmacology action (i.e. inhibition of the enzyme, HMG-CoA reductase) which leads to reduced cholesterol synthesis.

Carcinogenicity/Mutagenicity

In a 104-week carcinogenicity study in rats at dose levels of 2, 20, 60 or 80 mg/kg/day, the incidence of uterine polyps was statistically significantly increased only in females at the dose of 80 mg/kg/day. This dose produced a plasma AUC(0-24) value approximately 8 times higher (after correction for interspecies differences in protein binding) than the human plasma drug exposure after a 40 mg dose at steady-state. Increased incidences of polyps observed at 2, 20 and 60 mg/kg/day were not statistically different from the control group not exposed to rosuvastatin. The 60 mg/kg/day dose produced a plasma AUC(0-24) value approximately 5 times higher (after correction for interspecies differences in protein binding) than the mean human exposure after a 40 mg dose at steady-state. The occurrence of uterine polyps in old female rats is well-known and is considered benign tumors and lesions termed non-neoplastic in humans.

In a 107-week carcinogenicity study in mice given 10, 60, 200 or 400 mg/kg/day, the 400 mg/kg/day dose was poorly tolerated, resulting in early termination of this dose group. An increased incidence of hepatocellular carcinomas was observed at 200 mg/kg/day and an increase in hepatocellular adenomas was seen at 60 and 200 mg/kg/day. The dose of 200 mg/kg/day produced a plasma AUC(0-24) value approximately 37 times higher (after correction for interspecies differences in protein binding) than the mean human plasma drug exposure

after a 40 mg dose at steady state. An increased incidence of hepatocellular tumors was not seen at 10 mg/kg/day. The 60 mg/kg/day dose produced a plasma AUC(0-24) value approximately 4.9 times higher (after correction for interspecies differences in protein binding) than the mean human plasma drug exposure after a 40 mg dose at steady state. These hepatocellular effects are known to occur in rodents treated with statins without evidence of similar effects in humans.

In vitro, rosuvastatin was not mutagenic or clastogenic with or without metabolic activation in the Ames test with Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli, L-5178 y ± mouse lymphomas and the chromosomal aberration assay in Chinese hamster lung cells. Rosuvastatin was negative in the in vivo mouse micronucleus test.

Teratology and Reproductive Studies

The reproductive toxicity of rosuvastatin has been evaluated in fertility and pre- and post-natal developmental studies, at doses up to 50 mg/kg/day. Slight reductions in maternal body weight gain and food consumption were observed at 50 mg/kg/day. Rosuvastatin had no adverse effects on mating, fertility in both sexes, implantation and maintenance of pregnancy, pup morphology or survival at 50 mg/kg/day in the fertility study. In a pre- and post-natal sighting study in rats given ≥ 75 mg/kg/day there was reduced pup survival at birth at 125 and 150 mg/kg/day and during early lactation at 75 and 100 mg/kg/day. In the main pre- and post-natal developmental study, rosuvastatin showed no adverse effects on the duration of pregnancy, delivery and lactation in the dams in either generation at the high dose of 50 mg/kg/day. In the absence of plasma AUC exposure data in pregnant rats, comparisons with human data have been made on a received dose basis. The dose of 50 mg/kg/day equates to 90 times the human dose of 40 mg given to a 70 kg human.

The potential of rosuvastatin to cause developmental toxicity has been examined in the pregnant rat at doses up to 100 mg/kg/day and in the pregnant rabbit at doses up to 3 mg/kg/day. Rosuvastatin was shown to be neither embryo-fetolethal nor teratogenic in rats. At a maternally toxic dose of 3 mg/kg/day in rabbits, fetal examination showed no evidence of fetolethality or teratogenicity.

Overall, rosuvastatin has shown no reproductive or developmental toxicity.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.

    Cooper KJ, Martin PD, Dane AL et al. The effect of fluconazole on the

    pharmacokinetics of rosuvastatin. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2002; 58:527-31.

  1. 2. Cooper KJ, Martin PD, Dane AL, Warwick MJ, Schneck DW, Cantarini MV. Effect of
itraconazole on the pharmacokinetics of rosuvastatin. Clin Pharmacol Ther
2003;73:322-9.
  1. 3. Davidson M, Ma P, Stein EA, Gotto A, Raza A, Chitra R, Hutchinson H.
Comparison of effects on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and high-density
lipoprotein cholesterol with rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin in patients with Type IIa
or IIb hypercholesterolemia. Am J Cardiol 2002; 89:268-75.
  1. 4. Després JP, Lemieux I, Dagenais GR et al. HDL-cholesterol as a marker of
coronary heart disease risk: the Québec cardiovascular study. Atherosclerosis 2000;
153:263-72.
  1. 5. Kannel W. The Framingham Study: ITS 50 Year Legacy and Future Promise. J
Atheroscler Thromb 2000; 6:60-6.
  1. 6. Kinosian B, Glick H, Garland G. Cholesterol and Coronary Heart Disease:
Predicting Risks by Levels and Ratios. Ann Intern Med 1994; 121:641-47.
  1. 7. Laaskonen R, Ojala JP, Tikanen MJ, Himberg JJ. Serum ubiquinone concentrations
after short- and long-term treatment with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. Eur J
Clin Pharmacol 1994; 46:313-7.
  1. 8. Martin PD, Dane AL, Nwose OM, et al. No effect of age or gender on the
pharmacokinetics of rosuvastatin: A new HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor. J Clin
Pharmacol 2002; 42(10):1116-21.
  1. 9. Martin PD, Kemp J, Dane AL, et al. No effect of rosuvastatin on the
pharmacokinetics of digoxin in healthy volunteers. J Clin Pharmacol 2002;
42(12):1352-7.
  1. 10. Martin PD, Mitchell PD, Schneck DW. Pharmacodynamic effects and
pharmacokinetics of a new HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, rosuvastatin, after
morning or evening administration in healthy volunteers. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2002;
54(5):472-7.
  1. 11. Martin PD, Warwick MJ, Dane AL, Cantarini MV. A double-blind, randomized,
incomplete crossover trial to assess the dose proportionality of rosuvastatin in healthy
volunteers. Clin Ther 2003;25:2215-24.
  1. 12. McTaggart F, Buckett L, Davidson R, et al. Preclinical and clinical pharmacology
of rosuvastatin, a new 3-Hydroxy-3-Methylglutaryl Coenzyme A reductase
inhibitor. Am J Cardiol 2001; 87(Suppl):28B-32B.
  1. 13. Olsson AG, Pears J, McKellar J, Mizan J, Raza A. Effect of rosuvastatin on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in patients with hypercholesterolemia. Am J Cardiol 2001; 88(5):504-8.
  2. 14. Pasternak RC et al. ACC/AHA/NHLBI clinical advisory on the use and safety of statins. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 40(3):564-72.
  3. 15.

    Ridker PM, Danielson ED, Fonseca FAH, Genest J, Gotto AM, Kastelein JJP, et al.

    Rosuvastatin to prevent vascular events in men and women with elevated C-reactive protein. N Engl J Med 2008;359(21):2195-207.

  4. 16. Rubins H, Robins SS, Collins D et al. Gemfibrozil for the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in men with low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. N Engl J Med 1999; 341:410-8.
  5. 17.

    Crestor® (rosuvastatin calcium) Product Monograph. AstraZeneca Canada Inc.

    Submission Control No. 140400. Last Revised October 15, 2010.

About this document

Source: Health Canada – Drug Product Database (DPD) and product monographs · DIN (Drug Identification Number): 02385511

Found a mistake? Write to us via the contact page.

The information on this site does not replace the advice of a doctor or pharmacist.

Drug information for NTP-Rosuvastatin

Rx or OTC
Prescription (Rx)?
DIN 02385511, 02385538, 02385546, 02385554
Schedule(s) PRESCRIPTION
Active ingredient(s) Rosuvastatin (rosuvastatin calcium)
Dosage form(s) Tablet
Route(s) of administration Oral
Drug class (WHO ATC)
  1. C Cardiovascular system drugs
    1. C10 Lipid modifying agents
      1. C10A Lipid modifying agents, plain
        1. C10AA HMG CoA reductase inhibitors, plain lipid modifying drugs
          1. C10AA07 Rosuvastatin
Company TEVA CANADA LIMITED
Current status Cancelled Pre Market
Current status date June 13, 2017
Strengths and forms
DIN Strength Dosage form(s) Current status
02385511 5 MG Tablet Cancelled Pre Market June 13, 2017
02385538 10 MG Tablet Cancelled Pre Market June 13, 2017
02385546 20 MG Tablet Cancelled Pre Market June 13, 2017
02385554 40 MG Tablet Cancelled Pre Market June 13, 2017

Source: Health Canada – Drug Product Database (DPD) and product monographs, data as of November 1, 2026. Data from the Health Canada Drug Product Database, as published there. Not a substitute for the advice of a doctor or pharmacist.