Drug-labels.com

Rotarix Product Monograph

Updated:
Strength:
1000000 CCID50
Similar drugs:

Product Monograph - Rotarix

RECENT MAJOR LABEL CHANGES

6 DOSAGE FORMS, STRENGTHS, COMPOSITION AND PACKAGING,

8 ADVERSE REACTION, 10 CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY

XXX 2021

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Sections or subsections that are not applicable at the time of authorization are not listed.

RECENT MAJOR LABEL CHANGES..............................................................................................2

TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................2

PART I: HEALTH PROFESSIONAL INFORMATION .......................................................................4

1 INDICATIONS ................................................................................................................4

1.1 Pediatrics ............................................................................................................4

2 CONTRAINDICATIONS ...................................................................................................4

4 DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION...................................................................................4

4.1 Dosing Considerations .........................................................................................4

4.2 Recommended Dose and Dosage Adjustment.......................................................4

4.4 Administration.....................................................................................................5

5 OVERDOSAGE ...............................................................................................................8

6 DOSAGE FORMS, STRENGTHS, COMPOSITION AND PACKAGING ...................................8

7 WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS ....................................................................................9

7.1 Special Populations ............................................................................................ 11

7.1.1 Pregnant Women .........................................................................................11

7.1.2 Breast-feeding..............................................................................................11

8 ADVERSE REACTIONS .................................................................................................. 11

8.1 Adverse Reaction Overview................................................................................ 11

8.2 Clinical Trial Adverse Reactions .......................................................................... 11

8.2.1 Clinical Trial Adverse Reactions – Pediatrics ..................................................11

8.5 Post-Market Adverse Reactions.......................................................................... 15

9 DRUG INTERACTIONS.................................................................................................. 15

9.2 Drug Interactions Overview................................................................................ 15

9.4 Drug-Drug Interactions ...................................................................................... 16

9.5 Drug-Food Interactions ...................................................................................... 16

9.6 Drug-Herb Interactions ...................................................................................... 16

9.7 Drug-Laboratory Test Interactions ...................................................................... 16

10 CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY ......................................................................................... 16

10.1 Mechanism of Action.................................................................................... 16

11 STORAGE, STABILITY AND DISPOSAL ........................................................................... 17

PART II: SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION ........................................................................................ 18

13 PHARMACEUTICAL INFORMATION.............................................................................. 18

14 CLINICAL TRIALS.......................................................................................................... 18

14.1 Trial Design and Study Demographics ........................................................... 18

14.2 Study Results ............................................................................................... 20

15 NON-CLINICAL TOXICOLOGY ....................................................................................... 27

PATIENT MEDICATION INFORMATION ................................................................................... 28

PART I: HEALTH PROFESSIONAL INFORMATION

1 INDICATIONS

1.1 Pediatrics

ROTARIX (human rotavirus, live, attenuated, oral vaccine) is indicated for:

  • active immunization of infants from the age of 6 weeks for the prevention of gastroenteritis caused by circulating rotavirus strains (see 7 WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS and 14 CLINICAL TRIALS).

The results from clinical trials suggest that the vaccine’s efficacy may vary with the type of rotavirus causing the infection (see 14 CLINICAL TRIALS).

2 CONTRAINDICATIONS

ROTARIX is contraindicated in:

  • infants who are hypersensitive to this drug or to any ingredient in the formulation, including any non-medicinal ingredient, or component of the container. For a complete listing, see 6 DOSAGE FORMS, STRENGTHS, COMPOSITION AND PACKAGING.
  • Infants who experienced hypersensitivity after previous administration of rotavirus vaccines.
  • Infants with uncorrected congenital malformation (such as Meckel’s diverticulum) of the gastrointestinal tract that would predispose for intussusception.
  • Subjects with Severe Combined Immunodeficiency (SCID) disorder (see 8 ADVERSE REACTIONS).
  • Infants who have a history of intussusception.

4 DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION

4.1 Dosing Considerations

  • ROTARIX is for oral use only.
  • UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHOULD ROTARIX BE INJECTED.

The vaccination course consists of two doses. The first dose can be administered from the age of 6 weeks. There should be an interval of at least 4 weeks between doses. ROTARIX may be given to preterm infants following the same vaccination course. This could be incorporated into the Canadian Immunization Schedule (2 and 4 months). Other immunization schedules have also been evaluated (see 14 CLINICAL TRIALS). The administration of the 2 doses should be completed by the age of 24 weeks.

In particular circumstances, if the vaccine is given at an earlier age, and that the second dose is given within the shortest interval of 4 weeks, a lower immune response might be induced (see 14 CLINICAL TRIALS, Protective efficacy of ROTARIX liquid formulation).

It is strongly recommended that infants who receive a first dose of ROTARIX complete the 2 dose regimen with ROTARIX. There are no data on safety, immunogenicity or efficacy when ROTARIX is administered for the first dose and another rotavirus vaccine is administered for the second dose or vice versa.

In clinical trials, spitting or regurgitation of the vaccine has rarely been observed and, under such circumstances, a replacement dose was not given. However, in the unlikely event that an infant spits out or regurgitates most of the vaccine dose, a single replacement dose may be given at the same vaccination visit.

There are no restrictions on the infant’s consumption of food or liquid, including breastmilk, either before or after vaccination.

There is no evidence available to suggest that breastfeeding would reduce the protection against rotavirus gastroenteritis afforded by ROTARIX. Therefore, breastfeeding may be continued during the vaccination schedule.

The number of doses that would provide sufficient protection in immune compromised subjects has not been determined.

4.4 Administration

The vaccine is presented as a clear, colorless liquid, free of visible particles, for oral administration.

The vaccine is ready to use (no reconstitution or dilution is required).

The vaccine is to be administered orally without mixing with any other vaccines or solutions.

The vaccine should also be inspected visually for any foreign particulate matter and/or abnormal physical appearance prior to administration. In the event of either being observed, discard the vaccine. Any unused vaccine or waste material should be disposed of in accordance with local requirements.

This medicinal product must not be mixed with other medicinal products.

Administration of the vaccine in tube

Please read the instructions for use all the way through before starting to give the vaccine.

A What you need to do before giving Rotarix

  • Check the expiry date.
  • Check the tube has not been damaged nor is already open.
  • Check the liquid is clear and colourless, without any particles in it.

If you notice anything abnormal, do not use the vaccine.

  • This vaccine is given orally - straight from the tube.
  • It is ready to use - you do not need to mix it with anything.

B Get the tube ready

  1. 1. Pull off the cap
  2. • Keep the cap – you need this to pierce the membrane.
  3. • Hold the tube upright.
  4. 2. Repeatedly flick the top of the tube until it is clear of any liquid
  5. • Clear any liquid from the thinnest section of the tube by flicking just below the membrane.
  1. 3. Position the cap to open the tube
  2. • Keep the tube held upright.
  3. • Hold the side of tube
  4. • There is a small spike inside the top of the cap - in the centre.
  5. • Turn the cap upside down (180°).
  1. 4. To open the tube
  2. • You do not need to twist. Press the cap down to pierce the membrane.
  3. • Then lift off the cap.

C Check the tube has opened correctly

  1. 1. Check the membrane has been pierced
  2. • There should be a hole at the top of the tube.
  3. 2. What to do if the membrane has not been pierced
  4. • If the membrane has not been pierced return to section B and repeat steps 2, 3 and 4.

D Give the vaccine

  • Once the tube is open check the liquid is clear, without any particles in it.
  • If you notice anything abnormal, do not use the vaccine.
  • Give the vaccine straight away.
  • Position the child to give the vaccine
  • Seat the child leaning slightly backwards.
  • Administer the vaccine
  • Squeeze the liquid gently into the side of the child’s mouth - towards the inside of their cheek.
  • You may need to squeeze the tube a few times to get all of the vaccine out - it is okay if a drop remains in the tip of the tube.

5 OVERDOSAGE

Some cases of overdose have been reported. In general, the adverse event profile reported in these cases was similar to that observed after administration of the recommended dose of ROTARIX.

For management of a suspected drug overdose, contact your regional poison control centre.

6 DOSAGE FORMS, STRENGTHS, COMPOSITION AND PACKAGING

To help ensure the traceability of vaccines for patient immunization record-keeping as well as safety monitoring, health professionals should record the time and date of administration, quantity of administered dose (if applicable), anatomical site and route of administration, brand name and generic name of the vaccine, the product lot number and expiry date.

Table 1 Dosage Forms, Strengths, and Composition

Packaging

Tube

ROTARIX is available in a squeezable tube (LDPE) fitted with a membrane and a cap (polypropylene) in a pack size of 10.

Description

ROTARIX (human rotavirus, live, attenuated, oral vaccine) is a suspension presented in monodose oral applicators or monodose tubes for oral administration. The vaccine includes an antacid component to protect the vaccine during passage through the stomach and prevent its inactivation due to acidic environment.

Route of Administration

Dosage Form /

Strength / Composition

Non-medicinal Ingredients
OralSuspension/ Each 1.5 mL dose is formulated to contain not less than 106.0 CCID50 of human rotavirus RIX4414 strain (live, attenuated), produced on Vero cells.Di-sodium adipate, Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM), sucrose, and water for injection.

7 WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS

General

It is good clinical practice that vaccination should be preceded by a review of the medical history (especially with regard to previous vaccination and possible occurrence of undesirable events) and a clinical examination.

As with other vaccines, administration of ROTARIX should be postponed in infants suffering from acute severe febrile illness. However, the presence of a minor infection such as a cold should not result in the deferral of vaccination.

No safety or efficacy data are available for the administration of ROTARIX to:

  • Individuals who have received a blood transfusion or blood products, including immunoglobulins, within 42 days.

No efficacy data are available for the administration of ROTARIX to:

  • Immunocompromised patients such as individuals with malignancies receiving immunosuppressive therapy or who are otherwise immunocompromised.

The administration of ROTARIX should be postponed in infants suffering from diarrhea or vomiting.

Post-marketing safety studies indicate an increased incidence of intussusception after vaccination, mostly within 7 days of the first dose and, to a lesser extent, the second dose. The overall incidence of intussusception remains rare. It has not been established whether ROTARIX affects the overall risk of intussusception (see 8 ADVERSE REACTIONS, Clinical Trial Adverse Drug Reactions and Post-Market Adverse Drug Reactions).

As a precaution, healthcare providers should follow-up on any symptoms indicative of intussusception (severe abdominal pain, persistent vomiting, bloody stools, abdominal bloating and/or high fever). Parents/guardians should be advised to promptly report such symptoms.

For subjects with a predisposition for intussusception (see 2 CONTRAINDICATIONS). Excretion of the vaccine virus in the stools is known to occur after vaccination and lasts for 10 days on average with peak excretion around the 7th day. Viral antigen particles detected by ELISA were found in 50% (at day 7) of stools after the first dose and 17.4% (at day 3) and 4% (at day 7) of stools after the second dose. When these stools were tested for the presence of live vaccine strain, only 17% were positive. In clinical trials, cases of transmission of excreted vaccine virus to seronegative contacts of vaccinees have been observed without causing any clinical symptoms. ROTARIX should be administered with caution to individuals with immunodeficient close contacts, such as individuals with malignancies, or who are otherwise immunocompromised or receiving immunosuppressive therapy. Contacts of recent vaccinees should be advised to observe careful hygiene (including washing their hands) when changing children’s diapers.

As with any vaccine, a protective immune response may not be elicited in all vaccinees.

The extent of protection that ROTARIX might provide against rotavirus strains that have not been circulating in clinical trials is currently unknown (see 14 CLINICAL TRIALS).

ROTARIX does not protect against gastroenteritis due to other pathogens than rotavirus.

No data are available on the use of ROTARIX for post-exposure prophylaxis.

UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHOULD ROTARIX BE INJECTED.

Gastrointestinal

There are no data on the safety and efficacy of ROTARIX in infants with gastrointestinal illnesses. Administration of ROTARIX may be considered with caution in such infants when, in the opinion of the physician, withholding the vaccine entails a greater risk.

Immune

In some clinical trials, ROTARIX was not administered to infants known to have immunodeficient household members. There is a theoretical risk that the live virus vaccine can be transmitted to non-vaccinate contacts. Therefore, ROTARIX should be administered with caution to individuals known to have immunodeficient close contacts such as:

  • Individuals with malignancies or who are otherwise immunocompromised; or
  • Individuals receiving immunosuppressive therapy.

However, because nearly all children are infected with naturally occurring rotavirus by the age of 5 years, vaccination of infants may decrease the risk of exposure of immunodeficient household contacts to naturally occurring rotavirus. The health care provider should assess the potential risks and benefits of administering ROTARIX to infants known to have immunodeficient close contacts.

Asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic HIV infections are not expected to affect the safety or efficacy of ROTARIX. A clinical study in a limited number of asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic HIV positive infants showed no apparent safety problems (see 8 ADVERSE REACTIONS, Safety in Infants with Human Immunodeficiency [HIV] Infection). Administration of ROTARIX in immunosuppressed infants, including infants on immunosuppressive therapy, should be based on careful consideration of potential benefits and risks.

Sensitivity/Resistance

The vaccine contains 1073 mg of sucrose as an excipient. This amount is too low to cause adverse events in patients with rare hereditary problems such as fructose intolerance, glucose-galactose malabsorption or sucrase-isomaltase insufficiency.

7.1 Special Populations

7.1.1 Pregnant Women

ROTARIX is not intended for use in adults. Thus, human data on use during pregnancy are not available and animal reproduction studies have not been performed.

7.1.2 Breast-feeding

Evidence from some clinical trials with ROTARIX suggests breastfeeding does not reduce the protection against rotavirus gastroenteritis afforded by ROTARIX. Therefore, breastfeeding may be continued during the vaccination schedule.

8 ADVERSE REACTIONS

8.1 Adverse Reaction Overview

The safety profile presented below is based on data from clinical trials conducted with either the lyophilized or the liquid formulation of ROTARIX.

In a total of four clinical trials, approximately 3,800 doses of ROTARIX liquid formulation were administered to approximately 1,930 infants. Those trials have shown that the safety and reactogenicity profile of the liquid formulation is comparable to the lyophilized formulation.

In a total of twenty-three clinical trials, approximately 106,000 doses of ROTARIX (lyophilized or liquid formulation) were administered to approximately 51,000 infants.

In three placebo controlled clinical trials (Finland, India and Bangladesh), in which, ROTARIX lyophilized formulation was administered alone (administration of routine pediatric vaccines was staggered), the incidence and severity of the solicited events (collected 8 days post vaccination), diarrhea, vomiting, loss of appetite, fever, irritability and cough/runny nose, were not significantly different in the group receiving ROTARIX when compared to the group receiving placebo. No increase in the incidence or severity of these events was seen with the second dose.

8.2 Clinical Trial Adverse Reactions

Clinical trials are conducted under very specific conditions. The adverse reaction rates observed in the clinical trials; therefore, may not reflect the rates observed in practice and should not be compared to the rates in the clinical trials of another drug. Adverse reaction information from clinical trials may be useful in identifying and approximating rates of adverse drug reactions in real-world use.

8.2.1 Clinical Trial Adverse Reactions – Pediatrics

Intussusception (also see Post-Market Adverse Drug Reactions)

The risk of intussusception has been evaluated in a large safety trial conducted in Latin America and Finland where 63,225 infants were enrolled. No increased risk of intussusception in the ROTARIX group was observed and observed rates were comparable to the placebo group. Data are shown below in Table 2 and Table 3.

Table 2 Rate of intussusception within 31 days after administration

Intussusception

ROTARIX

N=31,673

Placebo

N=31,552

Relative risk

(95% CI)

First dose120.50 (0.07; 3.80)
Second dose550.99 (0.31; 3.21)

CI: Confidence Interval

Table 3 Rate of intussusception up to one year of age

Intussusception

ROTARIX

N=10,159

Placebo

N=10,010

Relative Risk

(95% CI)

First dose up to one year4140.28 (0.10; 0.81)

CI: Confidence Interval

Solicited adverse reactions

In study Rota-036, detailed safety information was collected by parents/guardians for 8 consecutive days following vaccination with ROTARIX (i.e. day of vaccination and the next 7 days). A diary card was completed to record irritability, cough/runny nose, the infant’s temperature, loss of appetite, vomiting, or diarrhea on a daily basis during the first week following each dose of ROTARIX or placebo. Adverse reactions among recipients of ROTARIX and placebo occurred at similar rates (see Table 4 below).

Table 4 Percentage of subjects with each solicited general symptom assessed as causally related to vaccination, reported from Day 0 to Day 7 after each RV1 vaccine/placebo dose – Rota-036 Pooled countries (Czech Republic, Finland, France, Germany, Italy and Spain)

SymptomROTARIXPlacebo
Nn%Nn%
Dose 1
Cough/Runny nose914586.3490295.9
Diarrhea914182.049071.4
Fever91413314.64906713.7
Irritability/Fussiness91429932.749017134.9
Loss of appetite91412613.84907114.5
Vomiting914444.8490244.9
Dose 2
Cough/Runny nose905535.9486347.0
Diarrhea90560.748681.6
Fever90516418.14869519.5
Irritability/Fussiness90523826.348612325.3
Loss of appetite90511813.04865711.7
Vomiting905182.0486234.7

N = number of subjects having received the considered dose of RV1 vaccine/placebo

n/% = number/percentage of subjects with the specified symptom reported for the considered dose

ROTARIX and placebo groups had a similar incidence of each specified solicited symptom (any, grade 3 and related) reported from Day 0 to Day 7 after any ROTARIX/placebo doses.

Serious Adverse Events (SAEs):

Study Rota-023

Among the total vaccinated cohort of 63,225 infants in study Rota-023 (31,673 in the RV1 group and 31,552 in the placebo group), a total of 1,975 subjects (948 [3.0%] infants in the RV1 vaccine group and 1,047 [3.3%] infants in the placebo group) reported at least one SAE (up to 30-90 days post Dose 2). No imbalance was observed between treatment groups for SAEs assessed as related to vaccination by the investigators. The overall SAE profile showed fewer SAEs/hospitalizations reported in the RV1 vaccine group compared to the placebo group, especially with respect to GE related SAEs.

In study Rota-023, a potential imbalance between groups was noted for reported cases of convulsions:

16 subjects in ROTARIX group (5.1/10,000) versus 6 subjects in the placebo group (1.9/10,000). Pooling of SAEs pertaining to "Convulsive disorders" ('Convulsions', 'Epilepsy', 'Grand mal convulsion', 'Status epilepticus' and 'Tonic convulsion'): resulted in 4 additional cases in the ROTARIX group and 6 additional cases in the placebo group.

Other clinical trials

Infants were monitored for serious adverse events that occurred in the 31 day period following vaccination in 8 clinical studies. In these eight trials, 608 subjects reported at least one SAE (450 in vaccinees and 158 in placebo recipients). The incidence of subjects reporting at least one SAE in the group receiving ROTARIX (8.12%) was similar to the incidence in the placebo group (8.53%).

Deaths:

In 8,262 infants enrolled and vaccinated in 10 completed trials, a total of 18 deaths were reported: 12 deaths in ROTARIX (0.19%, N=6,290) and 6 in placebo (0.30%, N=1,972). In the large safety study (Rota-023), 99 deaths occurred during the study1: 56 in ROTARIX group (0.18%, N=31,673) and 43 in the placebo group (0.14%, N=31,552). None of the cases were assessed as related to vaccination and no potential imbalance was detected for the 99 fatal cases in terms of overall mortality.

Safety in Preterm Infants:

In a clinical study, 1,009 preterm infants were administered ROTARIX or placebo (198 were 27-30 weeks gestational age and 801 were 31-36 weeks gestational age). The first dose was administered from 6 weeks after birth. SAEs were observed in 5.1% of recipients of ROTARIX as compared to 6.8% of placebo recipients. Similar rates of solicited and unsolicited symptoms were observed in ROTARIX and placebo recipients. No cases of intussusception were reported. For premature infants born less than 36 weeks of gestation, and who remain hospitalized at the time of recommended administration, close monitoring for at least 48 hours after vaccination should be considered.

Safety in Infants with Human Immunodeficiency (HIV) Infection:

In a clinical study, 100 infants with HIV infection were administered three doses of ROTARIX or placebo. The safety profile was similar between ROTARIX and placebo recipients.

Unsolicited Adverse Events (pooled analysis):

Infants were monitored for unsolicited adverse events that occurred in the 31-day period following vaccination in 17 placebo controlled clinical studies (Europe, North America, Latin America, Asia, Africa) including trials in which ROTARIX was co-administered with routine pediatric vaccines (see 9 DRUG INTERACTIONS). The following adverse reactions were considered as possibly related to vaccination:

1 up to the data lock point.

Table 5 Adverse reactions considered as possibly related to ROTARIX vaccination

FrequencyAdverse ReactionSystem/Organ Class

Common:

≥ 1% and < 10%

DiarrheaGastrointestinal disorders
IrritabilityGeneral disorders and administration site conditions

Uncommon:

≥ 0.1% and < 1%

flatulence, abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders
DermatitisSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders

8.5 Post-Market Adverse Reactions

The following events have been spontaneously reported during post-approval use of ROTARIX. Because these events were reported voluntarily from a population of uncertain size, it is not possible to reliably estimate their frequency or to establish a causal relationship to vaccine exposure.

Gastrointestinal disorders: Hematochezia, Intussusception*^, Gastroenteritis with vaccine viral shedding in infants with Severe Combined Immunodeficiency (SCID) disorder.

* See 7 WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS

^ Post-licensure studies and post-marketing spontaneous data suggest that intussusception following vaccination with ROTARIX is low and where it has been calculated, it occurs consistently at a rate less than 1 per 10,000 vaccinated infants (very rare) (see 14 CLINICAL TRIALS).

Infections and Infestations: Kawasaki disease

9 DRUG INTERACTIONS

9.2 Drug Interactions Overview

Immunosuppressive therapies may reduce the immune response to vaccines. The potential interaction of these therapies with ROTARIX is not known.

Use with Other Vaccines

ROTARIX can be given concomitantly with any of the following monovalent or combination vaccines [including hexavalent vaccines (DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib)]: diphtheria-tetanus-whole cell pertussis vaccine (DTPw), diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis vaccine (DTPa), Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine (Hib), inactivated polio vaccine (IPV), hepatitis B vaccine (HBV), pneumococcal conjugate vaccine and meningococcal serogroup C conjugate vaccine. Clinical studies demonstrated that the immune responses to and the safety profiles of the administered vaccines were unaffected.

In concomitant administration of ROTARIX and oral polio vaccine (OPV) clinical protection against severe rotavirus gastroenteritis was maintained. Concomitant administration of ROTARIX and OPV does not affect the immune response to the polio antigens but may reduce that to ROTARIX vaccine.

The immune response to ROTARIX is unaffected when OPV is administered 2 weeks apart from ROTARIX.

9.4 Drug-Drug Interactions

Interactions with other drugs have not been established.

9.5 Drug-Food Interactions

Interactions with food have not been established.

9.6 Drug-Herb Interactions

Interactions with herbal products have not been established.

9.7 Drug-Laboratory Test Interactions

Interactions with laboratory tests have not been established.

See

10 CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY

Rotavirus infection is the leading cause of severe acute gastroenteritis in infants and young children throughout the world. Rotavirus is transmitted mainly by the fecal-oral route, through close person-to-person contact, and through fomites. Ingested virus particles infect the cells in the villi of the small intestine, typically leading to villous atrophy. Characteristic clinical features include diarrhea, vomiting, fever and abdominal discomfort, occasionally leading to fatal dehydrating illness. Improvements or increased efforts in hygiene and sanitation are known to be of limited efficacy.

Rotavirus infection affects 95% of children by the age of 3 to 5 years worldwide. The incidence of rotavirus infections is highest in children between 6 and 24 months of age. Primary infection after 3 months of age usually causes the most severe disease. Subsequent infections are possible but typically cause much milder symptoms.

10.1 Mechanism of Action

ROTARIX contains a live, attenuated human rotavirus that replicates in the small intestine and induces immunity. ROTARIX vaccine is derived from the human 89-12 strain which belongs to G1 serotype and P[8] genotype. G1 is the most prevalent strain worldwide. It is known that the genotype P[8] is shared by most other circulating strains, including serotypes G3, G4 and G9.

The immunologic mechanism by which ROTARIX protects against rotavirus gastro-enteritis is not completely understood. A relationship between antibody responses to rotavirus vaccination and protection against rotavirus gastroenteritis has not been established.

Duration of Protection: Following two doses, ROTARIX is shown to provide at least 79% efficacy against severe rotavirus gastroenteritis through the second year of age (see 14 CLINICAL TRIALS).

11 STORAGE, STABILITY AND DISPOSAL

Store in a refrigerator (2ºC to 8ºC). Do not freeze.

In order to protect the vaccine from light it is recommended that the vaccine is stored in the original package.

The expiry date of the vaccine is indicated on the label and packaging.

PART II: SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION

13 PHARMACEUTICAL INFORMATION

Drug Substance

Proper name: Human rotavirus, live, attenuated, oral vaccine.

Product Characteristics:

ROTARIX (human rotavirus, live, attenuated, oral vaccine) is a monovalent, live, attenuated virus vaccine derived from the human 89-12 strain which belongs to G1 serotype and P[8] genotype. G1 is the most prevalent strain worldwide. It is known that the genotype P[8] is shared by most other circulating strains, including serotypes G3, G4 and G9. Natural infection with the virus is not limited to the G and P related antigens, but also is associated with the structural proteins VP2 and VP6, in addition to VP7 and VP4 as well as with the non-structural proteins such as NSP4. It has been shown that the induction of an immune response following vaccination with an attenuated G1P[8] human strain is sufficient to provide cross-protection against severe gastroenteritis linked to different G strains.

14 CLINICAL TRIALS

14.1 Trial Design and Study Demographics

Protective efficacy of ROTARIX lyophilized formulation

Clinical studies have been conducted in Europe, Latin America, Africa and Asia to evaluate the protective efficacy of ROTARIX against any and severe rotavirus gastroenteritis.

Table 6 Study demographics and trial design

Study No.Trial designDosage and route of administrationNo. of subjectsMean age at administration in weeks (range)Gender
Rota-004Multi-centre, double blinded, randomized, placebo controlled study

Oral

2 doses of 104.7 foci forming units (ffu) at 2 and 4 months of age

First efficacy follow-up:

245 Vaccine

123 Placebo

Second efficacy follow-up:

241 Vaccine

120 Placebo

First dose:

Vaccine: 8.3 (6-12)

Placebo: 8.2 (6-12)

Second dose:

Vaccine: 16.3 (10-12)

Placebo: 16.1(13-22)

Vaccine:

Male 53.5%

Placebo:

Male: 50.4%

Study No.Trial designDosage and route of administrationNo. of subjectsMean age at administration in weeks (range)Gender
Rota-006Multi-centre, multi-country, double blind, randomized, placebo controlled study

Oral

2 doses (of either 104.7, 105.2 or 105.8 foci forming units (ffu)) at 2 and 4 months of age

First efficacy follow-up:

1,392 Vaccine

454 Placebo

Second efficacy follow-up:

332 Vaccine

109 Placebo

First dose:

Vaccine*: 8.3 (6-12)

Placebo: 8.3 (6-12)

Second dose:

Vaccine: 17.9 (13-28)

Placebo: 17.9 (13-26)

Vaccine & Placebo

Male: 52%

Rota-023Multi-centre, multi-country, double blinded, randomized, placebo controlled study

Oral

2 doses of 106.5 CCID50 at 2 and 3 to 4 months of age1

First efficacy follow-up:

9,009 Vaccine

8,858 Placebo

Second efficacy follow-up:

7,175 Vaccine

7,062 Placebo

First dose:

Vaccine: 8.4 (5-13)

Placebo: 8.4 (2-13)

Second dose:

Vaccine: 16.3 (10-36)

Placebo: 16.3 (9-30)

Vaccine: Male: 50.1%

Placebo: Male: 52.0%

Rota-036Multi-centre, multi-country, double blinded, randomized, placebo controlled study

Oral

2 doses of 106.5 CCID50 at a 2, 3 months, 2, 4 months, 3, 4 months or 3, 5 months schedule1

First efficacy follow-up:

2,572 Vaccine

1,302 Placebo

Second efficacy follow-up:

2,554 Vaccine

1,294 Placebo

First dose:

Vaccine: 11.5 (5-18)

Placebo: 11.5 (6-16)

Second dose:

Vaccine: 19.7 (10-30)

Placebo: 19.7 (10-27)

Vaccine: Male 53.6 %

Placebo: Male: 50.9%

Rota-037Multi-centre, multi-country, double blinded, randomized, placebo controlled study†

Oral

2 doses of 106.0 CCID50 at 10, 14 weeks; or 3 doses at 6, 10, 14 weeks1

First efficacy follow-up:

2,974 Vaccine

1,443 Placebo

First dose†:

Vaccine: 6.3 (3-11)

Placebo: 6.3 (2-11)

Second dose

Vaccine: 11.3 (8-21)

Placebo: 11.3 (9-19)

Third dose:

Vaccine: 16.2 (12-26)

Placebo: 16.3 (12-25)

Vaccine:

Male: 50.3%

Placebo:

Male: 51.4%

1 The administration schedule depends on the countries in which the studies were conducted.

* This is applicable to the 105.8 ffu titre vaccine

† The placebo group received 3 doses of placebo at 6, 10, 14 weeks. The two-dose vaccine group received vaccine at weeks 10 and 14, but also placebo at the first dose (6 weeks), such that all participants received three blinded doses.

Clinical studies on protective efficacy were undertaken with ROTARIX lyophilized formulation, on which ROTARIX approval was based. Subsequently, clinical studies were undertaken with the liquid formulation to assess the elicited immune response compared to the lyophilized formulation, including a non-inferiority study (see Protective efficacy of ROTARIX liquid formulation).

14.2 Study Results

Rota-036

A clinical study performed in Europe (Rota-036) evaluated ROTARIX given according to different European schedules (2, 3 months; 2, 4 months; 3, 4 months; 3, 5 months) in more than 3,800 subjects. Severity of gastroenteritis was defined according to the Vesikari 20-point scale which evaluates the full clinical picture of rotavirus gastroenteritis by taking into account the severity and duration of diarrhea and vomiting, the severity of fever and dehydration as well as the need for treatment.

Table 7 Efficacy following two doses of ROTARIX persisting through the first and second rotavirus seasons (Rota-036)

1st Rotavirus Season2nd Rotavirus Season
Efficacy (%)95% CIEfficacy (%)95% CI
Any rotavirus gastroenteritis87.1*79.6; 92.171.9*61.2; 79.8

Severe rotavirus gastroenteritis

(Vesikari score ≥11)

95.8*89.6; 98.785.6*75.8; 91.9
Rotavirus gastroenteritis requiring medical attention91.8*84; 96.376.2*63.0; 85.0
Hospitalization due to rotavirus gastroenteritis100*81.8; 10092.2*65.6; 99.1

* Statistically significant (p<0.05)

Vaccine efficacy during the first year of life progressively increased with increasing

disease severity, reaching 100% (95% CI: 84.7;100) for Vesikari scores ≥ 17.

Table 8 Strain-specific efficacy in 2,572† ROTARIX vaccine recipients and 1,302† placebo recipients through 2 rotavirus seasons (Rota-036)

TypeThrough One Rotavirus SeasonThrough Two Rotavirus Seasons
Rotavirus gastroenteritis of any severity

Severe rotavirus^

gastroenteritis

Rotavirus gastroenteritis of any severitySevere rotavirus^ gastroenteritis
Efficacy (%)95% CIEfficacy (%)95% CIEfficacy (%)95% CIEfficacy (%)95% CI
G1[P8]95.6*87.9; 98.896.4*85.7; 99.689.8*82.9; 94.296.4*90.4; 99.1
G2P[4]62.0-124.4; 94.474.7-386.2; 99.658.3*10.1; 81.085.5*24.0; 98.5
G3[P8]89.9*9.5; 99.8100.0*44.8; 100.084.8*41.0; 97.393.7*52.8; 99.9
G4[P8]88.3*57.5; 97.9100.0*64.9; 100.083.1*55.6; 94.595.4*68.3; 99.9
G9[P8]75.6*51.1; 88.594.7*77.9; 99.472.9*59.3; 82.285.0*71.7; 92.6
Strains with [P8] genotype88.2*80.8; 93.096.5*90.6; 99.1n.an.an.an.a
Pooled non G1 (G2, G3, G4, G9, G12)n.an.an.an.a72.9*62.9; 80.587.7*78.9; 93.2

†ATP cohort for efficacy

* Statistically significant (p<0.05)

^ Severe gastroenteritis defined as a score ≥ 11 on the Vesikari scale.

A clinical study performed in Latin America (Rota-023) evaluated ROTARIX in more than 17,500 subjects. Severity of gastroenteritis was defined according to WHO criteria. The protective vaccine efficacy against severe rotavirus gastroenteritis requiring hospitalization and/or rehydration therapy in a medical facility and the strain specific vaccine efficacy after 2 doses of ROTARIX are presented in Table 9.

Rota-023

A clinical study performed in Latin America (Rota-023) evaluated ROTARIX in more than 17,500 subjects. Severity of gastroenteritis was defined according to WHO criteria. The protective vaccine efficacy against severe rotavirus gastroenteritis requiring hospitalization and/or rehydration therapy in a medical facility and the strain specific vaccine efficacy after 2 doses of ROTARIX are presented in Table 9.

Table 9 Strain specific vaccine efficacy following 2 doses of ROTARIX (Rota-023)

Type

Severe rotavirus gastroenteritis (1st year of life)

ROTARIX N=9,009;

Placebo N=8,858

Severe rotavirus gastroenteritis (2nd year of life)

ROTARIX N=7,175;

Placebo N=7,062

Efficacy (%)95% CIEfficacy (%)95% CI
All rotavirus gastroenteritis84.7*71.7; 92.479.0*66.4; 87.4
G1P[8]91.8*74.1; 98.472.4*34.5; 89.9
G2P[4]41.0-79.2; 82.41.6-7,626.1; 98.6
G3P[8]87.7*8.3; 99.771.9-47.7; 97.1
G4P[8]50.8#-844; 99.263.1*0.7; 88.2
G9P[8]90.6*61.7; 98.987.7*72.9; 95.3
Strains with P[8] genotype90.9*79.2; 96.879.5*67.0; 87.9

N=ATP cohort for efficacy

*statistically significant (p<0.05)

# The numbers of cases on which the estimates of efficacy against G4P[8] were based were very small (1 case in the ROTARIX group and 2 cases in the placebo).

G2P[4] serotype

Due to the rareness of the G2P[4] serotype, a meta analysis was performed. A pooled analysis of four efficacy studies, listed in Table 6, showed a 71.4% (95% CI:20.1;91.1) efficacy against severe rotavirus gastroenteritis (Vesikari score ≥ 11) caused by rotavirus G2P[4] type during the first year of life (see Table 10).

Table 10 Pooled analysis of severe rotavirus G2P[4] gastroenteritis and ROTARIX efficacy in studies Rota-004, Rota-006, Rota-023, and Rota-036: 2 weeks after Dose 2 up to the end of the first year follow up

Study

ROTARIX

N= ATP cohort for Efficacy

n=severe rotavirus gastroenteritis

Placebo

N= ATP cohort for Efficacy

n=severe rotavirus gastroenteritis

Vaccine Efficacy

(VE) *

Nn%Nn%%95% CI
Rota-00424500.012310.8100.0-1,858.0;100.0
Rota-0061,39200.045430.7100.021.1;100.0
Rota-0239,00950.18,85890.145.4-81.5;85.6
Rota-0362,57210.01,30220.264.7-386.2;99.57
All*13,21860.010,737150.171.420.1;91.1

Results from the first efficacy follow-up period on the ATP cohort for efficacy

*VE defined as 1-stratified Poisson rate ratio

Rota-037

A clinical study performed in Africa (Rota-037) in more than 4,900 subjects evaluated ROTARIX given at approximately 10 and 14 weeks of age (2 doses, n=1,647) or 6, 10 and 14 weeks of age (3 doses, n=1,651). The 2- and 3-dose regimens were pooled and compared against placebo (n=1,641). The vaccine efficacy against severe rotavirus gastroenteritis (scored using the 20-point Vesikari scale) during the first year of life was 61.2 % (96.2 % CI: 42.9;73.7). The study was not powered to evaluate a difference in vaccine efficacy between the 2- and 3-dose regimens. The protective vaccine efficacy observed against any and severe rotavirus gastro-enteritis is presented in Table 11.

Table 11 Study conducted in Africa: 1st year of life – pooled results (ROTARIX N=2,974; Placebo N = 1,443 (§))

Vaccine efficacy (%)

against any rotavirus gastro-enteritis

[95% CI]*

StrainAny severitySevere†
G1P[8]

68.3

[53.6; 78.5]

56.6

[11.8; 78.8]

G2P[4]

49.3

[4.6; 73.0]

83.8

[9.6; 98.4]

G3P[8]

43.4

[<0; 83.7]

51.5

[<0; 96.5]

G8P[4]

38.7

[<0; 67.8]

63.6

[5.9; 86.5]

G9P[8]

41.8

[<0; 72.3]

56.9

[<0; 85.5]

G12P[6]

48.0

[9.7; 70.0]

55.5

[<0; 82.2]

Strains with P[4] genotype

39.3

[7.7; 59.9]

70.9

[37.5; 87.0]

Strains with P[6] genotype

46.6

[9.4; 68.4]

55.2

[<0; 81.3]

Strains with P[8] genotype

61.0

[47.3; 71.2]

59.1

[32.8; 75.3]

§ ATP cohort for efficacy

† Severe gastro-enteritis defined as a score ≥ 11 on the Vesikari scale

* CI are unadjusted for interim analysis and multiplicity and should not be used to conclude on superiority over placebo

Immune response

The immunologic mechanism by which ROTARIX protects against rotavirus gastroenteritis is not completely understood. A relationship between antibody responses to rotavirus vaccination and protection against rotavirus gastroenteritis has not been established. The following table shows the percentage of infants initially seronegative for rotavirus (IgA antibody titres < 20 U/mL (by ELISA)) and with serum anti-rotavirus IgA antibody titres ≥ 20 U/mL one to two months after the second dose of vaccine or placebo as observed in different studies (see Table 12).

Table 12 Percent of infants with serum anti-rotavirus IgA antibody titres ≥ 20 U/mL 1 to 2 months after the second dose

ScheduleStudies conducted inVaccinePlacebo
N% ≥ 20 U/mL95% CIN% ≥ 20 U/mL95% CI
2, 3 monthsFrance, Germany23982.877.5; 87.41278.74.4; 15.0
2, 4 monthsSpain18685.579.6; 90.28912.46.3; 21.0
3, 5 monthsFinland, Italy18094.490.0; 97.31143.51.0; 8.7
3, 4 monthsCzech Republic18284.678.5; 89.5902.20.3; 7.8
2, 3 to 4 months

Latin America;

11 countries

39377.973.8; 81.634115.111.7; 19.0
10, 14 weeks and 6, 10, 14 weeks (pooled)South Africa, Malawi22158.451.6; 64.911122.515.1; 31.4

Immune Response in Preterm Infants

In a clinical study conducted in preterm infants, ROTARIX was immunogenic; 85.7% of subjects achieved serum anti-rotavirus IgA antibody titres ≥ 20 U/mL (by ELISA) one month after the second dose of the vaccine.

Protective efficacy of ROTARIX liquid formulation

Four controlled studies were undertaken with ROTARIX liquid formulation to assess elicited immune response. Three of these were comparative studies in which healthy infants were enrolled to receive two doses of ROTARIX liquid or lyophilized formulations, given at the age of 2 and 3 months (Rota-048), 2 and 4 months (Rota-057), or 3 and 4 months (Rota-061). The immune response elicited by ROTARIX liquid formulation was comparable to that elicited by the lyophilized formulation (see Table 13).

Table 13 Percent of infants with serum anti-rotavirus IgA antibody titres ≥ 20U/mL 1 month after the second dose

ScheduleStudies conducted inLiquid FormulationLyophilized Formulation
N% ≥ 20 U/mL95% CIN% ≥ 20 U/mL95% CI
2, 3 monthsFinland8090.081.2; 95.68683.774.2; 90.8
2, 4 monthsPanama44980.876.9; 84.443473.569.1; 77.6
3, 4 monthsFinland74688.686.1; 90.825290.586.2; 93.8

In a study conducted in Vietnam (Rota-051), the immune response in terms of seroconversion rates and GMCs in the group that received two doses of ROTARIX liquid vaccine with the first and second dose given at 8 and 12 weeks of age (4 weeks apart) was lower than the response in the group that received two doses of ROTARIX liquid vaccine with the first and second dose given at 8 and 16 weeks of age (8 weeks apart).

Serum anti-RV IgA antibodies are generally accepted as a valid surrogate marker of protection, and published data suggests that the ROTARIX-induced serum anti-RV IgA antibodies might be a good correlate of vaccine induced protection, despite the absence of an established immune correlate of protection. The immune response observed after two doses of ROTARIX liquid formulation was comparable to the immune response observed after 2 doses of ROTARIX lyophilized formulation, the vaccine efficacy for the liquid formulation is assumed to be similar to that observed with the lyophilized formulation.

Post-Authorization Safety Study

A post-authorisation safety study was undertaken in Mexico to evaluate the temporal association between ROTARIX administration (co-administered with other EPI vaccines) and definite intussusception occurrence within 31 days (Day 0 to Day 30) following vaccination. The analysis was performed on a cohort of children (N=698) diagnosed with intussusception, who had received at least one dose of rotavirus vaccine and with available dates of rotavirus vaccine administration, date of birth and onset date of intussusception. The study results indicated a temporal association between administration of ROTARIX and intussusception in the 31 days post Dose 1, and the effect was observed to be concentrated in the first week post Dose 1. The study results did not indicate a temporal association between ROTARIX and intussusception in the 31 days post Dose 2.

Post-Authorization Observational Studies

A self controlled case series analysis and a matched case-control analysis were undertaken in infants immunized between July 2007 and June 2010 in Australia to evaluate cases of intussusception in the 21 day period following any vaccination with rotavirus vaccines. Data from this study indicate the likelihood of a small increased risk of intussusception following the first dose of ROTARIX. The study also found an increased risk of intussusception after Dose 2 of ROTARIX, but the risk was smaller than after Dose 1.

A meta-analysis of postmarketing surveillance studies conducted in Australia, Mexico, Brazil and the United States was performed to provide a single estimate of the risk of intussusception following the first and second dose of ROTARIX. The studies varied in terms of design and statistical power, and used different methods to estimate the risk; all studies included a risk estimation for the 7-day period after dose 1 and dose 2 separately, and obtained data through active and/or passive surveillance on confirmed intussusception cases. The overall estimate of risk of intussusception during the 7 days after vaccination was 5.39 (95% CI: 3.92; 7.41) after dose 1 and 1.81 (95% CI: 1.31; 2.49) after dose 2. These results indicate a transient increased incidence of intussusception after vaccination, mostly within 7 days of the first dose and, to a lesser extent, the second dose.

15 NON-CLINICAL TOXICOLOGY

Preclinical data reveal no special hazard for humans based on conventional studies of repeated dose toxicity.

About this document

Source: Health Canada – Drug Product Database (DPD) and product monographs · DIN (Drug Identification Number): 02300591

Revision date stated in the text: April 28, 2021

Found a mistake? Write to us via the contact page.

The information on this site does not replace the advice of a doctor or pharmacist.

Drug information for Rotarix

DIN 02300591
Schedule(s) SCHEDULE D
Active ingredient(s) Rotavirus vaccine (rix4414 strain), live, oral, attenuated (human) 1000000 CCID50
Dosage form(s) Suspension
Route(s) of administration Oral
Drug class (WHO ATC)
  1. J Antiinfectives for systemic use
    1. J07 Vaccines
      1. J07B Viral vaccines
        1. J07BH Rota virus diarrhea vaccines
          1. J07BH01 Rota virus, live attenuated
Company GLAXOSMITHKLINE INC
Current status Marketed
Current status date April 6, 2021

Source: Health Canada – Drug Product Database (DPD) and product monographs, data as of November 1, 2026. Data from the Health Canada Drug Product Database, as published there. Not a substitute for the advice of a doctor or pharmacist.