Product Monograph - Mycobutin
Recent Major Label Changes
| None at time of the most recent authorization |
|---|
Table of Contents
Certain sections or subsections that are not applicable at the time of preparation of the most recent authorized product monograph are not listed.
Recent Major Label Changes ................................................................................................... 2
Table of Contents ................................................................................................................... 2
Part 1: Healthcare Professional Information ........................................................................... 4
- 1.
Indications ....................................................................................................................... 4
1.1. Pediatrics .................................................................................................................. 4
1.2. Geriatrics .................................................................................................................. 4
- 2. Contraindications ............................................................................................................ 4
- 4.
Dosage and Administration ............................................................................................. 4
4.2. Recommended Dose and Dosage Adjustment ......................................................... 4
4.4. Administration .......................................................................................................... 4
4.5. Missed Dose ............................................................................................................. 5
- 5. Overdose ......................................................................................................................... 5
- 6. Dosage Forms, Strengths, Composition, and Packaging ................................................... 5
- 7.
Warnings and Precautions ............................................................................................... 5
General ................................................................................................................................. 5
Cardiovascular ...................................................................................................................... 6
Gastrointestinal .................................................................................................................... 6
Hepatic/Biliary/Pancreatic .................................................................................................... 7
Neurologic ............................................................................................................................ 7
Ophthalmologic .................................................................................................................... 7
Renal ..................................................................................................................................... 8
Sensitivity/Resistance ........................................................................................................... 8
Skin ....................................................................................................................................... 8
7.1. Special Populations .................................................................................................. 8
7.1.1. Pregnancy ........................................................................................................ 8
7.1.2. Breastfeeding .................................................................................................. 9
7.1.3. Pediatrics ......................................................................................................... 9
7.1.4. Geriatrics ......................................................................................................... 9
- 8.
Adverse Reactions ........................................................................................................... 9
8.1. Adverse Reaction Overview ...................................................................................... 9
8.2. Clinical Trial Adverse Reactions ................................................................................ 9
8.2.1. Clinical Trial Adverse Reactions – Pediatrics .................................................. 11
8.3. Less Common Clinical Trial Adverse Reactions ....................................................... 11
8.4. Abnormal Laboratory Findings: Hematologic, Clinical Chemistry, and Other Quantitative Data ............................................................................................................... 11
8.5. Post-Market Adverse Reactions ............................................................................. 12
- 9.
Drug Interactions ........................................................................................................... 12
9.2. Drug Interactions Overview .................................................................................... 12
9.3. Drug-Behaviour Interactions .................................................................................. 12
9.4. Drug-Drug Interactions ........................................................................................... 12
9.5. Drug-Food Interactions........................................................................................... 18
9.6. Drug-Herb Interactions ........................................................................................... 18
9.7. Drug-Laboratory Test Interactions ......................................................................... 18
- 10.
Clinical Pharmacology ................................................................................................... 18
10.1. Mechanism of Action .............................................................................................. 18
10.2. Pharmacodynamics ................................................................................................ 18
10.3. Pharmacokinetics ................................................................................................... 18
- 11. Storage, Stability, and Disposal ...................................................................................... 21
- 12. Special Handling Instructions ......................................................................................... 21
Part 2: Scientific Information ................................................................................................ 22
- 13. Pharmaceutical Information .......................................................................................... 22
- 14. Clinical Trials .................................................................................................................. 22
- 15. Microbiology ................................................................................................................. 22
- 16. Non-Clinical Toxicology .................................................................................................. 29
Patient Medication Information ........................................................................................... 33
Part 1: Healthcare Professional Information
1. Indications
MYCOBUTIN (rifabutin) is indicated for:
- the prevention of disseminated Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) disease in patients with advanced HIV infection (CD4+ cell count £ 200/mm3 with an AIDS defining diagnosis, or CD4+ cell count £ 100/mm3 without an AIDS defining diagnosis).
To reduce the development of drug-resistant bacteria and maintain the effectiveness of MYCOBUTIN and other antibacterial drugs, MYCOBUTIN should be used only to treat infections that are proven or strongly suspected to be caused by susceptible bacteria. When culture and susceptibility information are available, they should be considered in selecting or modifying antibacterial therapy. In the absence of such data, local epidemiology and susceptibility patterns may contribute to the empiric selection of therapy.
1.1. Pediatrics
Pediatrics (<18 years of age): Based on the data submitted and reviewed by Health Canada, the safety and efficacy of MYCOBUTIN in pediatric patients have not been established; therefore, Health Canada has not authorized an indication for pediatric use. See 7.1.3 Pediatrics.
1.2. Geriatrics
Geriatrics (≥65 years of age): No data are available to Health Canada; therefore, Health Canada has not authorized an indication for geriatric use. See 7.1.4 Geriatrics.
2. Contraindications
- Concomitant use with rilpivirine containing prolonged-release suspension for injection is contraindicated (see 9 Drug Interactions).
- MYCOBUTIN is contraindicated in patients who are hypersensitive to this drug or to any ingredient in the formulation, including any non-medicinal ingredient, or component of the container. For a complete listing, see 6 Dosage Forms, Strengths, Composition and Packaging.
4. Dosage and Administration
4.2. Recommended Dose and Dosage Adjustment
It is recommended that MYCOBUTIN 300 mg be administered once daily with or without food. For those patients who experience nausea, vomiting or other gastrointestinal upsets, it may be useful to split the MYCOBUTIN dose in half (one 150 mg capsule) twice a day with food.
Limited pharmacokinetic data suggests that dose reductions may be required in patients with severe renal or hepatic impairment and in patients receiving concomitant treatment with certain drugs (see 7 Warnings and Precautions, General).
Health Canada has not authorized an indication for pediatric use (see 1 Indications).
4.4. Administration
The capsule(s) should be swallowed whole with a drink of water.
4.5. Missed Dose
If a dose is missed, the patient should take the dose as soon as remembered. If it is almost time for the next dose, the patient should skip the missed dose and take the next dose at the regularly scheduled time. Do not double the dose.
5. Overdose
No information is available on accidental overdosage in humans.
While there is no experience in the treatment of overdose with MYCOBUTIN, clinical experience with rifamycins suggest that gastric lavage to evacuate gastric contents (within a few hours of overdose), followed by instillation of an activated charcoal slurry into the stomach, may help absorb any remaining drug from the gastrointestinal tract.
MYCOBUTIN is 85% protein bound and distributed extensively into tissues (Vss: 8 to 9 L/kg). As unchanged drug, MYCOBUTIN is not primarily excreted via the urinary route (less than 10%), therefore, neither hemodialysis nor forced diuresis is expected to enhance the systemic elimination of unchanged MYCOBUTIN from the body in a patient with MYCOBUTIN overdose.
| For the most recent information in the management of a suspected drug overdose, contact your regional poison control centre or Health Canada’s toll-free number, 1-844 POISON-X (1-844-764-7669). |
|---|
- 6. Dosage Forms, Strengths, Composition, and Packaging
Table 1 – Dosage Forms, Strengths, and Composition
MYCOBUTIN is supplied as hard gelatin capsules having an opaque red-brown cap and body, imprinted with PHARMACIA & UPJOHN/ MYCOBUTIN, in white ink, each containing 150 mg rifabutin.
7. Warnings and Precautions
General
MYCOBUTIN prophylaxis must not be administered to patients with active tuberculosis. Among HIV positive patients, tuberculosis is common and may present with atypical or extrapulmonary findings. Patients are likely to have a nonreactive purified protein derivative (PPD) test despite active disease. In addition to chest X-ray and sputum culture, the following studies may be useful in the diagnosis of tuberculosis in the HIV positive patient: blood culture, urine culture, or biopsy of a suspicious lymph node.
| Route of Administration | Dosage Form/ Strength/Composition | Non-Medicinal Ingredients |
| oral | capsule, 150 mg rifabutin | microcrystalline cellulose, magnesium stearate, red iron oxide, silica gel, sodium lauryl sulfate, titanium dioxide, and edible white ink. |
Patients who develop signs and symptoms consistent with active tuberculosis while on MYCOBUTIN prophylaxis should be evaluated immediately, so that those with active disease may be given an effective combination regimen of anti-tuberculosis medications. Administration of MYCOBUTIN, as a single-agent, to patients with active tuberculosis is likely to lead to the development of tuberculosis which is resistant both to MYCOBUTIN and to rifampin.
There is no evidence that MYCOBUTIN provides effective prophylaxis against M. tuberculosis infections. Patients requiring prophylaxis against both M. tuberculosis and Mycobacterium avium complex may be given isoniazid and MYCOBUTIN concurrently.
Significant drug-drug interactions between rifabutin and protease inhibitors, among many other drugs, require careful consideration based upon the overall assessment of the patient and patient’s specific drug profile since drug safety and efficacy can be impacted.
Rifabutin is a CYP450 3A inducer. Therefore, co-administration with antiretroviral products including but not limited to bictegravir, elvitegravir/Cobicistat, oral rilpivirine, or doravirine and anti-HCV products including but not limited to sofosbuvir (alone or in combination) is not recommended due to the expected decrease in plasma concentrations of the antiretrovirals and anti-HCV products which may lead to loss of virologic response and possible development of resistance (see 9.2 Drug Interactions Overview).
For further recommendations, please refer to the most recent Product Monograph of the antiretrovirals or contact the specific manufacturer.
Anaphylactic shock has occurred with other antibiotics of the same class.
Cardiovascular
In the rat, single intravenous doses of up to 36 mg/kg or oral doses of up to 200 mg/kg daily for four days did not affect blood pressure or heart rate or the responses of these parameters to several autacoids. There was an increase of about 50% in respiratory rate beginning about 100 minutes following an intraduodenal dose of 50 mg/kg in the anaesthetized dog. There were, however, no other significant changes in cardiovascular or respiratory system parameters.
Gastrointestinal
Gastric pH alteration due to progressing HIV disease has been linked with malabsorption of some drugs used in HIV-positive patients (e.g., rifampin, isoniazid). Drug serum concentration data from AIDS patients with varying disease severity (based on CD4+ counts) suggest that rifabutin absorption is not influenced by progressing HIV disease. However, when stomach pH is increased with drug co-administration, rifabutin absorption may be impaired.
Oral doses of up to 20 mg/kg rifabutin did not affect gastric emptying rate in the rat.
Clostridioides difficile-associated disease (CDAD)
Clostridioides difficile-associated disease (CDAD) has been reported with use of many antibacterial agents, including MYCOBUTIN (rifabutin). CDAD may range in severity from mild diarrhea to fatal colitis. It is important to consider this diagnosis in patients who present with diarrhea, or symptoms of colitis, pseudomembranous colitis, toxic megacolon, or perforation of colon subsequent to the administration of any antibacterial agent. CDAD has been reported to occur over 2 months after the administration of antibacterial agents.
Treatment with antibacterial agents may alter the normal flora of the colon and may permit overgrowth of Clostridioides difficile. C. difficile produces toxins A and B, which contribute to the development of CDAD. CDAD may cause significant morbidity and mortality. CDAD can be refractory to antimicrobial therapy.
If the diagnosis of CDAD is suspected or confirmed, appropriate therapeutic measures should be initiated. Mild cases of CDAD usually respond to discontinuation of antibacterial agents not directed against Clostridioides difficile. In moderate to severe cases, consideration should be given to management with fluids and electrolytes, protein supplementation, and treatment with an antibacterial agent clinically effective against Clostridioides difficile. Surgical evaluation should be instituted as clinically indicated, as surgical intervention may be required in certain severe cases.
Hepatic/Biliary/Pancreatic
The pharmacokinetics of rifabutin were studied in 40 patients with mild (n=30), moderate (n=6) and severe (n=4) hepatic impairment. Significant variability was noted. Caution should be exercised in treating patients with severe hepatic disease. For patients with severe liver insufficiency a dose reduction should be considered. Mild and moderate hepatic impairment does not require a dose modification.
Due to increased plasma concentrations and other pharmacokinetic considerations, a decrease in dosage may be considered in patients with severe liver insufficiency or because of potential CYP450 3A-related interactions in patients co-administered certain other drugs (see 4.2 Recommended Dose and Dosage Adjustment).
Neurologic
Oral doses of 200 mg/kg rifabutin in the mouse and 100 mg/kg in the rat caused CNS depression lasting up to six hours post dose. Rifabutin (50 mg/kg) did not antagonize amphetamine, pentylenetetrazol or reserpine in the mouse. Rifabutin did not affect neuromuscular coordination (rotarod) or conditioned avoidance response in the rat at 50 mg/kg. There were no consistent effects on body temperature in mice, rats or dogs treated with rifabutin.
Ophthalmologic
Patients should be carefully monitored to avoid uveitis. If uveitis is suspected, the patient should be referred to an ophthalmologist and, if considered necessary, treatment with MYCOBUTIN should be suspended.
Uveitis is rare when MYCOBUTIN is used as a single agent at 300 mg/day for prophylaxis of MAC in HIV-infected persons, even with the concomitant use of fluconazole and/or macrolide antibiotics. However, if higher doses of MYCOBUTIN are administered in combination with these agents, the incidence of uveitis is higher.
Patients who developed uveitis had mild to severe symptoms that resolved after treatment with corticosteroids and/or mydriatic eye drops; in some severe cases, however, resolution of symptoms occurred after several weeks.
When uveitis occurs, temporary discontinuance of MYCOBUTIN and ophthalmologic evaluation are recommended. In most mild cases, MYCOBUTIN may be restarted; however, if signs or symptoms recur, use of MYCOBUTIN should be discontinued (see 9 Drug Interactions and 8 Adverse Reactions).
Renal
Caution is recommended when treating patients with severe renal insufficiency. The disposition of rifabutin (300 mg) was studied in 18 patients with varying degrees of renal function. Area under plasma concentration time curve (AUC) increased by about 71% in patients with severe renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance below 30 mL/min) compared to patients with creatinine clearance (CrCl) between 61–74 mL/min. In patients with mild to moderate renal insufficiency (CrCl between 30–61 mL/min), the AUC increased by about 41%. A 50% reduction in the dosage of rifabutin is recommended for patients with CrCl < 30 mL/min.
No dosage adjustment is recommended in mild to moderate renal impairment (see 4.2 Recommended Dose and Dosage Adjustment).
Due to increased plasma concentrations and other pharmacokinetic considerations, a decrease in dosage may be considered in patients with severe renal impairment or because of potential CYP450 3A-related interactions in patients co-administered certain other drugs (see 4.2 Recommended Dose and Dosage Adjustment).
Sensitivity/Resistance
Development of Drug Resistant Bacteria
Prescribing MYCOBUTIN in the absence of a proven or strongly suspected bacterial infection is unlikely to provide benefit to the patient and risks the development of drug-resistant bacteria.
Because MYCOBUTIN (rifabutin) may be associated with neutropenia, and more rarely thrombocytopenia, physicians should consider obtaining hematologic studies periodically in patients receiving MYCOBUTIN prophylaxis.
Skin
There have been reports of severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs), such as Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) with anti-tuberculosis drugs (see 8 Adverse Reactions). If patients develop a skin rash they should be monitored closely and suspect drug(s) discontinued if lesions progress. Identifying the specific drug is difficult, as multiple anti-tuberculosis drugs are prescribed in association concurrently. Specifically, for DRESS, a multi-system potential life-threatening SCAR, time to onset of the first symptoms may be prolonged. DRESS is a clinical diagnosis, and its clinical presentation remains the basis for decision making. An early withdrawal of the suspect drug is essential because of the syndrome’s mortality and visceral involvement (e.g., liver, bone marrow or kidney).
7.1. Special Populations
7.1.1. Pregnancy
There are no adequate and well-controlled studies of MYCOBUTIN use in pregnant women. No teratogenic effects were observed in reproduction studies carried out in rats and rabbits (see 16 Non-Clinical Toxicology). Because animal reproduction studies are not always predictive of human response, MYCOBUTIN should be used in pregnant women only if the potential benefit justifies the potential risk to the fetus.
7.1.2. Breastfeeding
It is not known whether MYCOBUTIN is excreted in human milk. Precaution should be exercised because many drugs can be excreted in human milk. Because many drugs are excreted in human milk and given the potential for serious adverse reactions in nursing infants, a decision should be made whether to discontinue nursing or discontinue the drug, taking into account the importance of the drug to the nursing mother.
7.1.3. Pediatrics
Pediatrics (<18 years of age): Based on the data submitted and reviewed by Health Canada, the safety and efficacy of MYCOBUTIN in pediatric patients have not been established; therefore, Health Canada has not authorized an indication for pediatric use (see 1 Indications). However, limited safety data are available from 22 HIV positive children who received MYCOBUTIN as treatment for disseminated MAC disease, in combination with at least two other antimycobacterials for periods ranging from 1 to 183 weeks.
The mean daily doses (mg/kg) for these children were: infants one year of age, 18.5 (range 15.0 to 25.0); children 2 to 10 years, 8.6 (range 4.4 to 18.8); adolescents 14 to 16 years, 4.0 (range 2.8 to 5.4). MYCOBUTIN was generally safe in this treatment group. Adverse experiences were similar to those observed in the adult population, and included leukopenia, neutropenia and skin rash. Doses of MYCOBUTIN may be administered mixed with foods such as applesauce (see 8.2.1 Clinical Trial Adverse Reactions – Pediatrics).
7.1.4. Geriatrics
Geriatrics (≥65 years of age): MYCOBUTIN administered as a single dose has been evaluated in 24 healthy, elderly (71-80 years) volunteers. The pharmacokinetic profile of MYCOBUTIN is not significantly modified by age, although the inter-individual variability in this age group was slightly higher when compared to younger (25-37 years) volunteers.
8. Adverse Reactions
8.1. Adverse Reaction Overview
MYCOBUTIN was generally well tolerated in the controlled clinical trials involving 566 patients treated with MYCOBUTIN and 580 patients treated with placebo. The most serious adverse reaction to MYCOBUTIN was neutropenia.
8.2. Clinical Trial Adverse Reactions
Clinical trials are conducted under very specific conditions. Therefore, the frequencies of adverse reactions observed in the clinical trials may not reflect frequencies observed in clinical practice and should not be compared to frequencies reported in clinical trials of another drug.
The most common adverse events reported more frequently in the MYCOBUTIN treated patients than in the placebo group, were: urine discoloration, neutropenia, skin rash, nausea and/or vomiting, and abdominal pain (see Tables 2 and 3). The incidence of urine discoloration and neutropenia in patients treated with MYCOBUTIN were significantly greater than in patients treated with placebo (Fisher's Test, p< 0.01 and p=0.03 respectively).
Sixteen percent (16%) of MYCOBUTIN treated patients discontinued therapy due to an adverse event as compared to 8% of placebo-treated patients. The primary reasons for discontinuation of MYCOBUTIN were: skin rash (4%), gastrointestinal intolerance (3%) and neutropenia (2%).
The following table enumerates adverse experiences that occurred at a frequency of 1% or greater among the patients treated with MYCOBUTIN and those treated with placebo in the Phase III clinical trials.
| Table 2 – Clinical Adverse Experiences Reported in ≥1% of Patients Treated with MYCOBUTIN | ||||
| System Organ Class / Preferred Term | MYCOBUTIN n=566 (%) | PLACEBO n=580 (%) | ||
| Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||
| Abdominal pain | 4 | 3 | ||
| Nausea | 6 | 5 | ||
| Nausea and vomiting | 3 | 2 | ||
| Vomiting | 1 | 1 | ||
| Diarrhoea | 3 | 3 | ||
| Dyspepsia | 3 | 1 | ||
| Eructation | 3 | 1 | ||
| Flatulence | 2 | 1 | ||
| General disorders and administration site conditions | ||||
| Pyrexia | 2 | 1 | ||
| Asthenia | 1 | 1 | ||
| Chest pain | 1 | 1 | ||
| Pain | 1 | 2 | ||
| Metabolism and nutrition disorders | ||||
| Decreased appetite | 2 | 2 | ||
| Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | ||||
| Myalgia | 2 | 1 | ||
| Nervous system disorders | ||||
| Headache | 3 | 5 | ||
| Dysgeusia | 3 | 1 | ||
| Psychiatric disorders | ||||
| Insomnia | 1 | 1 | ||
| Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | ||||
| Rash | 11 | 8 | ||
| Pruritus | 1 | 1 | ||
| Renal and urinary disorders | ||||
| Chromaturia | 30 | 6 | ||
The following adverse events have occurred in more than one patient receiving MYCOBUTIN, but an etiologic role for MYCOBUTIN has not been established: aphasia, confusion, non-specific T wave changes on the electrocardiogram, and seizures. The following adverse event has occurred in one patient receiving MYCOBUTIN, but an etiologic role for MYCOBUTIN has not been established: pseudomembranous colitis.
When MYCOBUTIN was administered at doses from 1050 mg/day to 2400 mg/day, generalized arthralgia and uveitis were reported. These adverse experiences abated when MYCOBUTIN was discontinued.
8.2.1. Clinical Trial Adverse Reactions – Pediatrics
The safety and effectiveness of MYCOBUTIN for prophylaxis of MAC disease in children and adolescents under 18 years of age have not been established. However, limited safety data are available from 22 HIV positive children who received MYCOBUTIN as treatment for disseminated MAC disease, in combination with at least two other antimycobacterials for periods ranging from 1 to 183 weeks.
The mean daily doses (mg/kg) for these children were: infants one year of age, 18.5 (range 15.0 to 25.0); children 2 to 10 years, 8.6 (range 4.4 to 18.8); adolescents 14 to 16 years, 4.0 (range 2.8 to 5.4). MYCOBUTIN was generally safe in this treatment group. Adverse experiences were similar to those observed in the adult population, and included leukopenia, neutropenia and skin rash. Doses of MYCOBUTIN may be administered mixed with foods such as applesauce.
8.3. Less Common Clinical Trial Adverse Reactions
Considering data from the Phase III clinical trials, and from other clinical studies, MYCOBUTIN appears to be a likely cause of the following adverse events which occurred in less than 1% of the treated patients: arthralgia, chest pressure or pain with dyspnea, hemolysis, hepatitis, myositis, and skin discoloration.
8.4. Abnormal Laboratory Findings: Hematologic, Clinical Chemistry, and Other Quantitative Data
The following table enumerates the changes in laboratory values that were considered as laboratory test abnormalities in the Phase III clinical trials.
| Table 3 – Percentage of Patients with Laboratory Abnormalities | ||||
| Laboratory Abnormality | MYCOBUTIN (n=566) % | PLACEBO (n=580) % | ||
Chemistry: Increased ALT (> 150 U/L) Increased AST (> 150 U/L) Increased Alkaline Phosphatase (> 450 U/L) | 9 7 <1 | 11 12 3 | ||
Hematology: Neutropenia (ANC < 750/mm3) Leukopenia (WBC < 1500/mm3) Anemia (Hemoglobin < 8.0 g/dL) Thrombocytopenia (Platelet count < 50,000/mm3) Eosinophilia | 25 17 6 5 1 | 20 16 7 4 1 | ||
The incidence of neutropenia in patients treated with MYCOBUTIN was significantly greater than in patients treated with placebo (p = 0.03). Although thrombocytopenia was not significantly more common among patients treated with MYCOBUTIN in these trials, MYCOBUTIN has been clearly linked to thrombocytopenia in rare cases. One patient developed thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, which was attributed to MYCOBUTIN.
8.5. Post-Market Adverse Reactions
Adverse reactions identified through post-marketing surveillance by system organ class (SOC) are listed below:
Blood and lymphatic system disorders: Pancytopenia, white blood cell disorders (including agranulocytosis, lymphopenia, granulocytopenia).
Immune system disorders: Hypersensitivity, bronchospasm.
Eye disorders: Corneal deposits have been reported during routine ophthalmologic surveillance of some HIV-positive pediatric patients receiving MYCOBUTIN as part of a multiple drug regimen for MAC prophylaxis. The deposits are tiny, almost transparent, asymptomatic peripheral and central corneal deposits, and do not impair vision.
Hepato-biliary disorders: Jaundice, hepatic enzyme increased.
Skin disorders: Anti-tuberculosis drug use may lead to the occurrence of drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) as well as other SCARs such as SJS, TEN, and AGEP (see 7 Warnings and Precautions, Skin).
9. Drug Interactions
9.2. Drug Interactions Overview
Multiple dosing of rifabutin has been associated with induction of hepatic metabolic enzymes of the CYP450 3A subfamily. Rifabutin’s predominant metabolite (25-desacetyl rifabutin; LM 565), may also contribute to this effect. Metabolic induction due to rifabutin is likely to produce a decrease in circulating levels of concomitantly administered drugs (especially those metabolized by the CYP450 3A pathway). Kinetic data suggest that enzymatic induction by rifabutin is complete within 5 days and is dose-independent over the 300 to 600 mg dose-range. Similarly, concomitant medications that competitively inhibit the CYP450 3A activity may increase circulating levels of rifabutin.
9.3. Drug-Behaviour Interactions
The interaction of MYCOBUTIN with individual behavioural risks (e.g. cigarette smoking, cannabis use, and/or alcohol consumption) has not been studied.
9.4. Drug-Drug Interactions
Rifabutin induces CYP450 3A enzymes and therefore may reduce the plasma concentrations of drugs metabolized by those enzymes. This effect may reduce the efficacy of standard doses of such drugs (see below).
Some drugs that inhibit CYP450 3A may significantly increase the plasma concentration of rifabutin. Because high plasma levels of rifabutin may increase the risk of adverse reactions, patients coadministered such drugs should be carefully monitored and in some cases the doses of MYCOBUTIN may need to be reduced (see below).
The following table summarizes the results and magnitude of the pertinent drug interactions assessed with rifabutin as reported in selected not all-inclusive publications from the scientific literature. The clinical relevance of these interactions and subsequent dose modifications, which are largely based upon pharmacokinetic data extrapolations, should be judged in light of the population studied, severity of the disease, patient drug profile, and the likely impact on the risk/benefit ratio.
| Table 4 – Rifabutin Interaction Studies | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Table 4 – Rifabutin Interaction Studies | ||||||
| Table 4 – Rifabutin Interaction Studies | ||||||
| Table 4 – Rifabutin Interaction Studies | ||||||
| Table 4 – Rifabutin Interaction Studies | ||||||
| Coadministered Drugs | Effect on Rifabutin | Effect on Coadministered Drug | Comments | |||
| Coadministered Drugs | Effect on Rifabutin | Effect on Coadministered Drug | Comments | |||
| Coadministered Drugs | Effect on Rifabutin | Effect on Coadministered Drug | Comments | |||
| Coadministered Drugs | Effect on Rifabutin | Effect on Coadministered Drug | Comments | |||
| Coadministered Drugs | Effect on Rifabutin | Effect on Coadministered Drug | Comments | |||
| ANTIRETROVIRALS | ||||||
| Amprenavir | 2.9-fold ↑ AUC, 2.2-fold ↑ Cmax | No significant change in kinetics. | A 50% reduction in the rifabutin dose is recommended when combined with amprenavir. Increased monitoring for adverse reactions is warranted. | |||
Atazanavir/ Ritonavir | 48% ↑ in AUC, 149% ↑ Cmax of rifabutin. 990% ↑ in AUC, 677% ↑ Cmax of 25-O-desacetyl-rifabutin | No significant change in kinetics. | A 75% reduction in the dose of rifabutin (to 150 mg daily) is recommended. Increased monitoring for adverse reactions is warranted. | |||
| Bictegravir | ND | AUC ↓38% Cmin ↓56% Cmax ↓20% | Although not studied, co-administration of rifabutin with Biktarvy (bictegravir/emtricitabine/ tenofovir alafenamide) is not recommended due to an expected decrease in tenofovir alafenamide in addition to the reported reduction in bictegravir. | |||
Darunavir/ Ritonavir | No significant change in rifabutin kinetics. 881% ↑ in AUC, 377% ↑ Cmax of 25-O-desacetyl-rifabutin | 57% ↑ in AUC, 42% ↑Cmax of darunavir. 66% ↑ in AUC, 68% ↑ Cmax of ritonavir. | A 75% reduction in the dose of rifabutin (to 150 mg daily) is recommended. Increased monitoring for adverse reactions is warranted. | |||
| Delavirdine | ND | Oral clearance - 5-fold resulting in significantly lower mean trough plasma concentrations (18±15 to 1.0±0.7 µM) | Study conducted in HIV-1 infected patients. Rifabutin is not recommended for patients dosed with delavirdine mesylate 400 mg q8h. | |||
| Didanosine | No significant change in kinetics. | No significant change in kinetics at steady state. | Didanosine administration with pH increasing buffers may decrease rifabutin absorption | |||
| Dolutegravir | ND | No significant change in dolutegravir kinetics at steady state. | ||||
| Doravirine | ND | 50% ↓ in AUC 68% ↓ in C24 ↔ in Cmax | If concomitant use is necessary, increase the doravirine dosage as instructed in doravirine-containing product prescribing information. | |||
| Elvitegravir/ Cobicistat | No significant change in rifabutin kinetics. 6.3-fold ↑ in AUC, 4.8-fold ↑ Cmax of 25-O-desacetyl-rifabutin | No change in elvitegravir except 67% ↓ Ctrough of elvitegravir. No change in cobicistat exposure. | Co-administration of rifabutin with elvitegravir/cobicistat is not recommended due to an expected decrease in elvitegravir exposure (see 7 Warnings and Precautions, General). | |||
| Etravirine | No significant change in rifabutin kinetics. | 37% ↓ in AUC, 37% ↓ in Cmax and 35% ↓ in Cmin. | No dose adjustment of rifabutin is required when etravirine is not co-administered with ritonavir. | |||
Fosamprenavir/ ritonavir * | 64% ↑ AUC ** | 35% ↑ AUC and 36% ↑ Cmax, no effect Ctrough (amprenavir) | Dosage reduction of rifabutin by at least 75% (to 150 mg every other day or three times per week) is recommended when combined with fosamprenavir | |||
| Indinavir | 173% ↑ in AUC, 134% - Cmax | 34%↓ in AUC, 25%¯ in Cmax | Dose reduction of rifabutin to half the standard dose and increase of indinavir to 1000 mg every 8 hours are recommended when rifabutin and indinavir are co-administered. | |||
Lopinavir/ ritonavir* | 5.7-fold ↑ AUC, 3.4 fold ↑ Cmax** | No significant change in lopinavir kinetics. | Dosage reduction of rifabutin by at least 75% of the usual dose of 300 mg/day is recommended (i.e., a maximum dose of 150 mg every other day or three times per week). Increased monitoring for adverse reactions is warranted. Further dosage reduction of rifabutin may be necessary. | |||
| Saquinavir | ND | 40% ¯ in AUC | ||||
| Rilpivirine | ND | 42% ↓ in AUC 48% ↓ in Cmin 31% ↓ in Cmax | Although not studied, co-administration of rifabutin with rilpivirine/tenofovir alafenamide/ emtricitabine is not recommended due to an expected decrease in tenofovir alafenamide in addition to the reported reduction in rilpivirine (see 7 Warnings and Precautions, General). | |||
| Co-administration of rifabutin with cabotegravir/rilpivirine prolonged-release injectable suspension is contraindicated (see 2 Contraindications). | ||||||
| Ritonavir * | 4 fold increase in AUC, 2.5 fold increase in Cmax | ND | In the presence of ritonavir the subsequent risk of side effects, including uveitis may be increased. If a protease inhibitor is required in a patient treated with rifabutin, agents other than ritonavir should be considered (see 7 Warnings and Precautions, General). | |||
Tipranavir/ ritonavir* | 2.9-fold ↑ AUC, 1.7-fold ↑ Cmax | No significant change in tipranavir kinetics. | Therapeutic drug monitoring of rifabutin is recommended. | |||
| Zidovudine | No significant change in kinetics. | Approximately 32%¯ in Cmax and AUC | A large controlled clinical study has shown that these changes are of no clinical relevance. | |||
| ANTI-HCV DRUGS | ||||||
| Sofosbuvir | ND | 36% ↓ in Cmax and 24% ¯ AUC | Co-administration of rifabutin with sofosbuvir (alone or in combination) is not recommended (see 7 Warnings and Precautions, General). | |||
| ANTIFUNGALS | ||||||
| Fluconazole | 82% - in AUC | No significant change in steady-state plasma concentrations | Patients receiving rifabutin and fluconazole concomitantly should be carefully monitored (see 7 Warnings and Precautions, Ophthalmologic) | |||
| Itraconazole | ND | 70% to 75% ¯ in Cmax and AUC | One case report suggests a kinetic interaction resulting in an increase in serum rifabutin levels and a risk for developing uveitis in the presence of itraconazole. | |||
| Posaconazole | 31%↑ Cmax, 72%↑ AUC | 43%↓ Cmax, 49%↓ AUC | If the drugs are coadministered, patients should be monitored for adverse events associated with rifabutin administration. | |||
| Voriconazole | 195%↑ Cmax, 331%↑ AUC *** | Rifabutin (300 mg once daily) decreased the Cmax and AUC of voriconazole at 200 mg twice daily by 69% and 78%, respectively. During co-administration with rifabutin, the Cmax and AUC of voriconazole at 350 mg twice daily were 96% and 68% of the levels when administered alone at 200 mg twice daily. At a voriconazole dose of 400 mg twice daily Cmax and AUC were 104% and 87% higher, respectively, compared with voriconazole alone at 200 mg twice daily. | Concurrent administration of voriconazole and rifabutin is not recommended. | |||
| ANTI-PCP (Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia†) | ||||||
| Dapsone | ND | Approximately 27% to 40% ¯ in AUC | Study conducted in HIV infected patients (rapid and slow acetylators). | |||
| Sulfamethox-azole-Trimethoprim | No significant change in Cmax and AUC | Approximately 15% to 20% ¯ in AUC | In another study, only trimethoprim (not sulfamethoxazole) had 14% ¯ in AUC and 6%¯ in Cmax but were not considered clinically significant. | |||
| ANTI-MAC (Mycobacterium avium intracellulare complex) | ||||||
| Azithromycin | No PK interaction | No PK interaction | ||||
| Clarithromycin | Approximately 77% - in AUC | Approximately 50%¯ in AUC | Study conducted in HIV infected patients. Dose of rifabutin should be adjusted in the presence of clarithromycin (see 4 Dosage and Administration and 7 Warnings and Precautions). | |||
| ANTI-TB (Tuberculosis) | ||||||
| Ethambutol | ND | No significant change in AUC or Cmax | ||||
| Isoniazid | ND | Pharmacokinetics not affected | ||||
| Pyrazinamide | No significant change in AUC or Cmax | No significant change in AUC or Cmax | No dose adjustment needed | |||
| Bedaquiline | ND | No change in bedaquiline kinetics. 1.4-fold - in M2 and approximately 3.0-fold - in M3 metabolites of bedaquiline. | If the drugs are co-administered, patients should be monitored for adverse events associated with bedaquiline administration. | |||
| ORAL CONTRACEPTIVES | ||||||
| Ethinylestradiol / Norethindrone | ND | Ethinylestradiol: 20% ↓ in Cmax, 35% ↓ in AUC. Norethindrone: 32% ↓ in Cmax, 46% ↓ in AUC. | Patients should be advised to use other additional non-hormonal methods of contraception. | |||
| OTHER | ||||||
| Methadone | ND | No significant effect | No apparent effect of rifabutin on either peak levels of methadone or systemic exposure based upon AUC. Rifabutin kinetics not evaluated. | |||
| Tacrolimus | ND | ND | Authors report that rifabutin decreases tacrolimus trough blood levels. | |||
| Theophylline | ND | No significant change in AUC or Cmax compared with baseline. | ||||
ND: Not done; AUC: Area under the Concentration vs. Time Curve; Cmax: Maximum serum concentration
* A lower dose of ritonavir was used when combined with fosamprenavir, lopinavir or tipranavir than when used alone; the PK effects upon ritonavir used alone or in combination with these antivirals were not studied.
** - Drug plus active metabolite
*** - Voriconazole dosed at 400 mg twice daily
† Formerly known as Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia
MYCOBUTIN has liver enzyme-inducing properties. The related drug rifampin is known to reduce the activity of a number of drugs, including dapsone, narcotics (including methadone), anticoagulants, corticosteroids, cyclosporine, cardiac glycoside preparations, quinidine, oral contraceptives, oral hypoglycemic agents (sulfonylureas), and analgesics. Rifampin has also been reported to decrease the effects of concurrently administered ketoconazole, barbiturates, diazepam, verapamil, beta-adrenergic blockers, clofibrate, progestins, disopyramide, mexiletine, theopylline, chloramphenicol, and anticonvulsants. Because of the structural similarity of rifabutin and rifampin, MYCOBUTIN may be expected to have some effect on these drugs as well. However, unlike rifampin, MYCOBUTIN appears not to affect the acetylation of isoniazid. When the effects of rifabutin on hepatic microsomal enzyme activity were compared to those of rifampin in a study with 8 healthy normal volunteers, rifabutin appeared to be a less potent enzyme inducer than rifampin. The significance of this finding for clinical drug interactions is not known. Dosage adjustment of drugs listed above may be necessary if they are given concurrently with MYCOBUTIN.
Patients using oral contraceptives should consider changing to nonhormonal methods of birth control.
9.5. Drug-Food Interactions
Interactions with food have not been established.
9.6. Drug-Herb Interactions
Interactions with herbal products have not been established.
9.7. Drug-Laboratory Test Interactions
Interactions with laboratory tests have not been established.
10. Clinical Pharmacology
10.1. Mechanism of Action
Rifabutin is a derivative of rifamycin S, belonging to the class of ansamycins. The rifamycins owe their antimycobacterial efficacy to their ability to penetrate the cell wall and to their ability to complex with and to inhibit DNA-dependent RNA polymerase. Rifabutin has been found to interact with and to penetrate the outer layers of the mycobacterial envelope.
Rifabutin inhibits DNA-dependent RNA polymerase in susceptible strains of Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis but not in mammalian cells. In resistant strains of E. coli, rifabutin, like rifampin, did not inhibit this enzyme.
It is not known whether rifabutin inhibits DNA-dependent RNA polymerase in Mycobacterium avium or in M. intracellulare which constitutes M. avium complex (MAC). Rifabutin inhibited incorporation of thymidine into DNA of rifampin-resistant M. tuberculosis, suggesting that rifabutin may also inhibit DNA synthesis, which may explain its activity against rifampin-resistant organisms.
10.2. Pharmacodynamics
Over a dose range of 300 to 900 mg/day, administration of multiple, daily rifabutin doses did not elicit any serious/unexpected adverse events in 34 HIV positive patients. Doses higher than 900 mg/day produced chest discomfort, flu-like syndromes, lower back pain, skin discoloration, and gastrointestinal symptoms. However, a steep dose-related increase in the incidence of arthralgia, from 0% at 900 mg/day to 100% at 1200 mg/day, and the occurrence of uveitis at doses higher than 1800 mg/day was seen. No apparent effects on hematological or hepatic parameters were seen for doses up to 1200 mg/day, except mild leukopenia. Rifabutin in HIV positive patients was well tolerated up to 900 mg/day. The minimum effective dose and the optimal dose of rifabutin for prophylaxis, are not known.
10.3. Pharmacokinetics
Rifabutin pharmacokinetics have been studied using daily doses ranging from 150 mg to 1200 mg (600 mg bid) in the pivotal pharmacokinetics and dose-tolerance studies involving both healthy normal volunteers and HIV positive patients, for periods of up to 28 days.
The pharmacokinetic profile of rifabutin is not significantly modified by age or by hepatic dysfunction, although the inter-individual variability in elderly subjects (71-80 years) was slightly higher. Renal insufficiency was correlated to a decrease in urinary excretion with AUC and Cmax increases most apparent in severe disease. Caution and dose reductions may be required when treating patients with severe renal or severe hepatic impairment.
Rifabutin steady-state pharmacokinetics in early symptomatic HIV positive patients are similar to those in healthy normal volunteers but the variability between individuals is higher in the HIV positive patients. No rifabutin disposition information is currently available in children or adolescents under 18 years of age.
Absorption
Absorption: In normal volunteers, a nominal therapeutic dose of 300 mg produces a mean Cmax of 375 ng/mL which is attained at approximately 3 hours post dose. At least 53% of the oral dose is absorbed.
Absolute Bioavailability: The mean (± SD) absolute bioavailability (F) of rifabutin from the capsule formulation in 15 early symptomatic HIV positive patients was found to be 20% (± 16%, n=5) following a single dose (first day), and was 12% (± 5%, n=7), after daily dosing for 4 weeks. This change was not statistically significant. The possible decrease in absolute bioavailability on day 28 may be due to autoinduction of rifabutin metabolism.
Effect of Food on Oral Absorption: A single study simultaneously examined the absorption of rifabutin from the capsule dosage form relative to a solution and also assessed the effect of food. A single 150 mg dose was administered to 12 male volunteers in a crossover manner. The administration of rifabutin with a high fat content meal decreased mean Cmax by 17% (156.2 vs. 187.9 ng/mL), increased mean Tmax from 3.0 to 5.4 hours and increased mean percent of dose excreted unchanged in urine by 26% (11.4% vs 9.1%). Only the changes in mean Tmax and the percent of dose excreted unchanged in urine were statistically significant. The data indicate that a high-fat content meal decreased the rate of absorption and increased urinary excretion of rifabutin with no change in extent of absorption. The relative bioavailability of the capsule with respect to the solution was estimated to be 85%.
Distribution:
Rifabutin appears to be widely distributed throughout the body and has been detected in all tissues and body fluids examined. Several times higher concentrations than those achieved in plasma have been observed in lung parenchyma, gall bladder and the small intestinal wall. The apparent volume of distribution at steady-state (Vss) estimated in early symptomatic HIV positive male patients following intravenous dosing was large (8 to 9 liters/kg), suggesting extensive distribution of rifabutin into the tissues. About 85% of the drug is bound to plasma proteins over a concentration range of 50 to 1000 ng/mL. Binding is predominantly to human serum albumin, is concentration independent and does not appear to be influenced by renal or hepatic dysfunction.
In a radio-tracer intravenous study for unchanged rifabutin, a triexponential concentration versus time disposition profile was observed. The fastest distributive phase (λ1) has a half-life of 9-15 minutes. The half-lives associated with the slow distributive phase (λ2) and terminal elimination (λz) seem comparable to those following oral dosing, after which absorption, distribution and elimination phases are clearly observed. The half-life of the slow distributive phase (t1/2,λ2) was estimated to be 3.5 to 4.5 hours in healthy males, and 1.7-3.3 hours in early symptomatic HIV patients, thus suggesting a lack of disease effects on the slow distributive phase. The volume of distribution at steady-state (Vss) was determined to be 8-9 L/kg in early symptomatic HIV patients. This estimate is approximately 13 to 15-fold larger than the total body water (TBW: 0.6 L/kg).
Tissue Distribution: A study in 4 surgical patients provided limited but useful information regarding tissue uptake. Rifabutin (measured as total antimicrobial activity) was found in all tissues studied, e.g. lung, gall bladder, ileum, jejunum, and muscle. Tissue concentrations were several times higher than those found in plasma. The lung to plasma ratio ranged from 1.4 to 8.6 at about 6 hours and 5.6 to 6.8 at 12 hours post-oral dosing. Even when plasma levels were undetectable, measurable levels of rifabutin persisted in lung up to 48 hours. The partitioning of rifabutin into ileum, jejunum, and bile appeared higher than the lung, and supports biliary excretion as a significant route of elimination. Distribution of rifabutin was lowest in the muscle, with a muscle:plasma ratio of < 1.
Plasma Protein Binding: The extent of in vitro protein binding of 14C-rifabutin in fresh human plasma was assessed by equilibrium dialysis. Approximately 90% of rifabutin was bound to plasma proteins over a concentration range of 0.1-10.0 μg/mL. The binding decreased to approximately 85% at higher concentrations of 20-100 μg/mL. At a concentration of 100 ng/mL, rifabutin was 68.3 ± 1.9% bound to human serum albumin (HSA) and 19.6 ± 3.1% bound to α-acid glycoprotein (AAG). These results suggest that rifabutin is predominantly bound to HSA. The free fraction (fu) in plasma is approximately 0.15 (95% CI: 0.138-0.158) and is independent of drug concentration within the concentration range observed following the standard 300 mg dose. Protein binding was assessed at 20 μg/mL by equilibrium dialysis in healthy subjects, the elderly, patients with alcoholic liver disease and renal insufficiency. Mean % bound averaged 95% in healthy subjects, 91% in the elderly, 90% in patients with alcoholic liver disease, and 92-94% in patients with renal insufficiency. Protein binding was therefore > 90% for all cases.
Metabolism:
Rifabutin undergoes extensive oxidative metabolism. Of the five metabolites that have been identified, 25-O-deacetyl and 31-hydroxy are the most predominant and show a plasma metabolite:parent area under the curve ratio of 0.10 for 25-O-deacetyl and 0.07 for 31-hydroxy metabolite. The 25-O-deacetyl metabolite has antimycobacterial activity equal to the parent drug and contributes up to 10% to the total antimicrobial activity. The 31-hydroxy metabolite has some antimicrobial activity (1/16 that of parent drug), but, considering its concentration in plasma, it is probably not contributing significantly to the therapeutic activity of rifabutin. Rifabutin can induce its own metabolism on multiple dosing. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) following multiple dosing decreased by 38%, but its terminal half-life remained unchanged.
Investigations elucidating the metabolic profile of rifabutin suggest extensive biotransformation. Urinary metabolism studies, using mass spectrometry, 1H-NMR spectrometry, and HPLC, have shown that rifabutin is metabolized to more than 20 different metabolites. Five among them have been identified: 25-O-deacetyl rifabutin (M1), 31-OH-rifabutin (M2), 32-OH rifabutin, 32-OH-25-O-deacetyl rifabutin, and 25-O-deacetyl rifabutin-N-oxide. The M1 derivative was determined to be as equally active as rifabutin microbiologically. The M2 derivative seems to possess approximately 1/16 of the activity of rifabutin.
The evidence of rifabutin autoinduction comes from estimates of CLT in early symptomatic HIV positive patients administered tracer intravenous 14C-rifabutin doses. The mean CLT was estimated to be 10.2 L/h on day 1 and 18.5 L/h on day 28, following 4 weeks of daily dosing, an increase of 80%. This estimate of CLT was not confounded by absolute bioavailability (F).
Elimination
The plasma elimination profile of rifabutin is biphasic with an initial half-life of approximately 4 hours followed by a mean terminal half-life of 45 (± 17) hours (range: 16 to 69 hours). Mean systemic clearance in healthy adult volunteers following a single oral dose was 0.69 (± 0.32) L/hr/kg (range: 0.46 to 1.34 L/hr/kg). Rifabutin is mainly excreted in the urine, primarily as metabolites and to a lesser extent in the faeces. Fifty-three percent (53%) of the oral dose of 14C-labelled drug was recovered in the urine by five days post-dose and 30% was recovered in the faeces over the same period. Renal and biliary excretion of unchanged drug each contribute approximately 5% to the systemic clearance.
Urinary and faecal excretion are the two major routes of elimination for rifabutin. The excretion characteristics of rifabutin and its metabolites have been assessed in a radiolabelled study. Following an oral dose (270 mg) as 14C-rifabutin solution (100 μCi) to 3 healthy volunteers, 53% of the dose was recovered in the urine over a 120 hour period and 30% in the faeces. Approximately 8% of the administered radioactive dose was recovered in urine as unchanged parent drug. After administration of rifabutin in the capsule dosage form, 5.17% was eliminated through bile, and 5.8% was eliminated in urine as unchanged drug.
- 11. Storage, Stability, and Disposal
Store at controlled room temperature, 15oC-30 oC. Keep container tightly closed.
12. Special Handling Instructions
There are no special handling instructions for this drug product.
Part 2: Scientific Information
13. Pharmaceutical Information
Drug Substance
Non-proprietary name of the drug substance: Rifabutin
Chemical name: [: (9S,12E,14S,15R,16S,17R,18R,19R,20S,21S,22E,24Z)-6,16,18,20-tetrahydroxy-1'-isobutyl-14-methyoxy-7,9,15,17,19,21,25-heptamethyl-spiro[9,4-(epoxypentadeca[1,11,13]trienimino)-2H-furo[2',3':7,8]naphth[1,2-d]imidazole-2,4'-piperidine]-5,10,26-(3H,9H)-trione-16-acetate.
Molecular formula and molecular mass: C46H62N4O11 ; 847.02 g/mol
Structural formula:
Physicochemical properties:
Description:
Rifabutin is a red-violet powder soluble in chloroform and methanol, sparingly soluble in ethanol, and very slightly soluble in water (0.19 mg/mL).
Melting Point 148 oC - 156 oC (with decomposition)
pKa Value 6.9 in methanol/water (l/l, v/v)
Partition Coefficient The partition coefficient of rifabutin between n-octanol and pH 6.8 buffer was determined to be > 100.
14. Clinical Trials
The clinical trial data on which the original indication was authorized is not available.
15. Microbiology
Mechanism of Action
Rifabutin inhibits DNA-dependant RNA polymerase in susceptible strains of Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis, but not in mammalian cells. In resistant strains of E. coli, rifabutin, like rifampin, did not inhibit this enzyme. It is not known whether rifabutin inhibits DNA-dependant RNA polymerase in Mycobacterium avium or in M. intracellulare which constitutes M. avium complex (MAC). Rifabutin inhibited incorporation of thymidine into DNA of rifampin-resistant M. tuberculosis, suggesting that rifabutin may also inhibit DNA synthesis, which may explain its activity against rifampin-resistant organisms.
Susceptibility Testing Interpretive Criteria (Breakpoints)
The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) interpretive criteria for susceptibility testing of rifabutin are listed in the following table:
| Table 5 – CLSI Susceptibility Interpretive Criteria for Rifabutin | |||||||||
| Pathogen | Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (µg/mL of Rifabutin) | Critical Concentration (µg/mL of Rifabutin) | |||||||
| S | SDD | I | R | ||||||
| Mycobacterium tuberculosis complexa | - | - | - | - | 0.5 | ||||
| Mycobacterium kansasii | ≤2 | - | - | ≥4 | - | ||||
| Slowly growing nontuberculous mycobacteria other than MAC and Mycobacterium kansasii | ≤2 | - | - | ≥4 | - | ||||
Source: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards for Susceptibility Testing of Mycobacteria, Nocardia spp., and Other Aerobic Actinomycetes; CLSI document M24S:ED2 2023. aUsing the fluorescence-based commercial shorter-incubation liquid media system. This document is updated annually. S = Susceptible. SDD = Susceptible dose-dependent. I = Intermediate. R = Resistant. | |||||||||
Standardized susceptibility test procedures require the use of quality control microorganisms to control the technical aspects of the test procedures. Quality control microorganisms are specific strains with intrinsic biological properties relating to resistance mechanisms and their genetic expression within the microorganism; the specific strains used for susceptibility test quality control are not clinically significant.
Organisms and quality control ranges for rifabutin to be utilized with CLSI methodology and susceptibility test interpretive criteria are listed in the following table:
| Table 6 – Quality Control Ranges for Rifabutin to be Used In Conjunction With CLSI Susceptibility Test Interpretive Criteria | ||||
Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (µg/mL of Rifabutin) | ||||
| Quality Control Strain | ||||
| Mycobacterium tuberculosis ATCC® 27294a | ≤0.12 | |||
| Mycobacterium tuberculosis ATCC® 27294b | 0.0312-0.0625 | |||
| Mycobacterium marinum ATCC® 927c | ≤0.12-0.5 | |||
Source: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards for Susceptibility Testing of Mycobacteria, Nocardia spp., and Other Aerobic Actinomycetes; CLSI document M24S:ED2 2023. a When testing M. tuberculosis using Middlebrook 7H9 medium supplemented with oleic acid-albumin-dextrose-catalase b When testing M. tuberculosis using the fluorescence-based commercial shorter-incubation liquid media system c When testing slowly growing nontuberculous mycobacteria in cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth with oleic acid-albumin-dextrose-catalase | ||||
In vitro Susceptibility Studies
There are no standardized methods for identification or susceptibility testing for M. avium complex. Various in vitro methodologies employ radiometric broth (7H12) or solid media. In general, the radiometric broth (7H12) procedure has been used for isolation of mycobacteria with specific identification by DNA probes. Susceptibility testing is often performed using a radiometric broth method. However, neither method has been optimized for M. avium complex.
The MIC of rifabutin against M. avium in broth media were 2 to 4 times lower when polysorbate 80 (Tween 80) was present. This effect was attributed to an increase in the permeability of the cell envelope caused by Tween 80. It is recommended that susceptibility testing of rifabutin against M. avium be carried out in the absence of Tween 80 or other detergents.
Mycobacterium avium Complex (MAC)
Rifabutin has demonstrated in vitro activity against M. avium Complex (MAC) organisms isolated from both HIV positive and HIV negative people. These studies predated the widespread use of gene probe techniques to distinguish between the two organisms, although it is now known that the vast majority of isolates from MAC-infected, HIV positive people are M. avium, whereas in HIV negative people, about 40% of the isolates are M. intracellulare.
In one reported study on 100 MAC isolates from AIDS patients summarized in the table below, 83% had MIC99 values of ≤0.25 μg/mL, and 96% had MIC99 values of ≤0.5 μg/mL when evaluated by a radiometric method 7H12 broth. In comparison, higher MICs were observed when the same isolates were tested in 7H11 by the agar proportion method. Twenty-three percent (23%) and 46% of isolates had MIC99 values of ≤0.25 and ≤0.5, respectively.
Table 7 – In Vitro Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations of Rifabutin Against Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare Isolated from AIDS Patients
No. Isolates Tested (Method) | Number of Isolates (cumulative %) | |||||||||
| MIC (μg/mL) | ||||||||||
| ≤0.25 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 2.0 | |||||||
| 100 (agar) | 23 (23) | 23 (46) | 25 (71) | 29 (100) | ||||||
| 100 (broth) | 83 (83) | 13 (96) | 2 (98) | 2 (100) | ||||||
Other studies to determine the susceptibilities of MAC isolates from AIDS patients have yielded similar results.
The susceptibility to rifabutin of the initial positive MAC isolates from AIDS patients who developed MAC bacteremia during two large, rifabutin, multicenter placebo-controlled trials for prevention of MAC is as follows:
Table 8 – Susceptibility to Rifabutin of the First Blood Isolates of MAC Recovered from Patients Receiving Prophylaxis with Rifabutin or Placebo
| Prophylaxis | No. of Isolates Tested | Number of Isolates (cumulative %) | |||||||||||
| MIC (μg/mL) | |||||||||||||
| ≤0.12 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 2.0 | >2.0 | ||||||||
| Placebo | 59 | 4 (6.8) | 8 (20.3) | 20 (54.2) | 15 (79.7) | 11 (98.3) | 1 (100) | ||||||
| Rifabutin | 29 | 3 (10.3) | 3 (20.7) | 16 (75.9) | 4 (89.7) | 3 (100) | 0 (100) | ||||||
For people who received placebo and rifabutin prophylaxis, 20.3% and 20.7% of the MAC isolates had MIC99 values of ≤0.25 μg/mL, 54.2% and 75.9% had MIC99 values of ≤0.5 μg/mL, and 79.7% and 89.7% had MIC99 values of ≤1.0 μg/mL, respectively, when evaluated by the radiometric 7H12 broth method. The distribution of MICs in the two groups did not differ significantly (Kruskal-Wallis p-value = 0.143).
In these studies, there was no significant difference between the results of the broth and agar methods; the geometric means of MIC99 values for all isolates were 0.64 and 0.78 μg/mL, respectively.
Mycobacterium tuberculosis
Rifabutin has in vitro activity against many strains of M. tuberculosis including some which are rifampin-resistant. In one study, utilizing the 7H12 broth dilution method, each of 20 rifampin-naive clinical isolates tested from Taiwan, had an MIC99 value of ≤0.125 μg/mL. The table below shows susceptibilities of 122 strains of M. tuberculosis isolates from rifampin-treated patients to rifampin and rifabutin in another study.
Table 9 – Susceptibility of Rifampin-Resistant Strains of M. tuberculosis to Rifabutin+
| No. Strains | RIFAMPIN MIC (μg/mL) | RIFABUTIN MIC (μg/mL) | ||||||||
| 1.0 | 5.0 | 10.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 2.0 | |||||
| 122 | 0 | 12.3 | 24.6 | 27.0 | 41.8 | 63.9 | ||||
+ Values are cumulative percentages
Other Mycobacterial Species
Rifabutin has shown activity against other mycobacterial species. Most strains of the following organisms were susceptible to concentrations of rifabutin of 0.5 μg/mL using the agar dilution method.
Table 10 – In Vitro Activity of Rifabutin Against Other Mycobacterial Species
| Isolates Tested | No. of Isolates (Cumulative %) | ||||
| MIC99 (μg/mL) | |||||
| 0.5 | 1.0 | 2.0 | |||
| Mycobacterium gordonae | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||
| Mycobacterium kansasii | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||
| Mycobacterium marinum | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||
| Mycobacterium terrae | 71.4 | 100 | 100 | ||
| Mycobacterium xenopi | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||
Rifabutin was active against Mycobacterium leprae with MIC99 values of 3.1 to 12.5 ng/mL when tested by the broth dilution method (BACTEC 460). It has an MIC99 value of 0.016 to 2 μg/mL against Mycobacterium phlei when tested by the agar dilution method.
Rifabutin is rapidly taken up by macrophages and monocytes and has been shown to be active against phagocytized M. avium intracellulare and M. tuberculosis.
Resistance
Mycobacterium avium Complex:
The cross-resistance relationship between rifampin and rifabutin appears to be partial. Rifampin and rifabutin MIC99 values against 523 isolates of M. avium complex were determined utilizing the agar dilution method:
| Table 11 – Susceptibility of M. avium Complex Strains to Rifampin and Rifabutin | ||||||||||
| % of Strains Susceptible/Resistant to Different Concentrations of Rifabutin (μg/mL) | ||||||||||
Susceptibility to Rifampin (μg/mL) | Number of Strains | Susceptible to 0.5 | Resistant to 0.5 only | Resistant to 1.0 | Resistant to 2.0 | |||||
| Susceptible to 1.0 | 30 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||
| Resistant to 1.0 only | 163 | 88.3 | 11.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||
| Resistant to 5.0 | 105 | 38.0 | 57.1 | 2.9 | 2.0 | |||||
| Resistant to 10.0 | 225 | 20.0 | 50.2 | 19.6 | 10.2 | |||||
| TOTAL | 523 | 49.5 | 36.7 | 9.0 | 4.8 | |||||
The majority of the strains (94%) were "naturally" resistant to rifampin (1.0 μg/mL or higher). Approximately 13% of those resistant strains were resistant to rifabutin in a concentration of ≥ 1.0 μg/mL.
Mycobacterium tuberculosis
The cross-resistance between rifampin and rifabutin is frequently observed with M. tuberculosis isolates but it is not complete. Analysis of cross-resistance between rifampin and rifabutin among 302 M. tuberculosis strains indicate that all strains that were susceptible to 1.0 μg/mL of rifampin were also susceptible to 0.5 μg/mL of rifabutin. 46.7% of the strains that were resistant to 5.0 μg/mL of rifampin and 12.0% of the strains that were resistant to 10.0 μg/mL of rifampin were susceptible to rifabutin at concentrations of 0.5 μg/mL.
| Table 12 – Susceptibility of M. tuberculosis Strains to Rifampin and Rifabutin | |||||||||||
| % of Strains Susceptible/Resistant to Different Concentrations of Rifabutin (μg/mL) | |||||||||||
Susceptibility to Rifampin (μg/mL) | Number of Strains | Susceptible to 0.5 | Resistant to 0.5 only | Resistant to 1.0 | Resistant to 2.0 | ||||||
| Susceptible to 1.0 | 180 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||||||
| Resistant to 1.0 only | 15 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||||||
| Resistant to 5.0 | 15 | 46.7 | 33.3 | 13.3 | 6.7 | ||||||
| Resistant to 10.0 | 92 | 12.0 | 14.1 | 27.2 | 45.7 | ||||||
| TOTAL | 302 | 70.5 | 6.0 | 8.9 | 14.6 | ||||||
In Vivo Studies
Mycobacterium avium Complex
Rifabutin and rifampin, each at doses of 6.25, 12.5 and 25 mg/kg orally, given six days per week for 12 weeks starting immediately after infection, were efficacious in ddY mice infected I.V. with Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare (MAI or MAC). Rifabutin was more effective than rifampin. In control mice, 96% developed macroscopic lung lesions. In mice treated with rifampin, 79% showed lung lesions, and in mice treated with rifabutin, 70% showed lung lesions. Advanced disease developed in 67% of control mice, 42% of rifampin-treated mice, and 31% of rifabutin-treated mice.
In another study, rifabutin and rifampin at doses of 20 and 80 mg/kg orally, given 6 days per week for 4 weeks, exhibited comparable efficacy in ddY mice infected with two different strains of MAI (N-260 and N-276).
Treatment, via the drinking water, was started 24 hours post-infection. Effectiveness was determined by counting the number of colony-forming units (CCU) in lungs and spleen homogenate plated on agar.
Rifabutin, at doses of 20 mg/kg three days per week, prevented M. avium infection in cyclosporine-treated rats. In a treatment study, at doses of 20 mg/kg five days per week, rifabutin reduced the number of mycobacteria in the spleen and liver by 200-fold in cyclosporine rats infected with M. avium.
Rifabutin was also effective in reducing the number of mycobacteria in tissues of thymectomized T-cell deficient mice infected with M. avium. Enhanced activity was observed in this animal model when rifabutin was combined with either ethambutol or a combination of ethambutol, clofazimine, amikacin and ciprofloxacin.
Rifabutin was also effective in T-cell deficient mice infected with various strains of M. intracellulare or M. tuberculosis but not with the severely virulent M. avium 724. In this study, rifabutin was given in the drinking water at a dose of 40 mg/kg for 2 months beginning 20-40 days after infection.
Rifabutin and rifampin were also compared at a dose of 40 mg/kg daily for 120 days, alone and in combination with other antibiotics with anti-mycobacterial activity (all via drinking water) in T-cell deficient mice infected with AIDS-associated strains of M. avium.
Rifabutin was more active than the other drugs against most of the strains, and the combinations containing rifabutin exhibited greater efficacy than those containing rifampin.
When rifabutin at a dose of 10 mg/kg was added to a combination of amikacin (50 mg/kg intramuscularly) and clofazimine (20 mg/kg orally) and administered by gavage to MAI-infected beige mice, no additional improvement to the efficacy was observed.
The activity of rifabutin alone or in combination with clofazimine or ethambutol or both against acute and chronic experimental MAI infections were studied. Groups of male beige mice were infected intravenously with M. intracellulare, Strain 571-8 (serotype 8) isolated from a hospital patient. Drug treatment was rifabutin, given at 5, 10, or 20 mg/kg day alone, or at 10 mg/kg/day in combination with clofazimine (20 mg/kg/day) and/or ethambutol (125 mg/kg/day), via oral gavage. Administration of drugs was begun three weeks before infection, immediately after infection, or three weeks after infection, and continued seven days a week for 4-8 weeks following infection.
Given immediately after infection, rifabutin at 5 mg/kg/day alone showed no antibacterial effect. At 10 mg/kg/day, lung tissue, 6 weeks after infection, showed a significant (p<0.05) reduction in CCU. At 20 mg/kg/day, both lung and spleen showed significant reductions in CCU. Given three weeks after infection, 5 mg/kg/day of rifabutin showed no significant protection. At 10 mg/kg/day, significant reductions in CCU of the spleen and complete elimination of CCU in the lungs were observed.
When treatment at 10 mg/kg/day was started three weeks before infection, CCU counts were eliminated in the lungs at 4 weeks and in the spleen at 8 weeks after infection. The lungs of untreated animals were cleared spontaneously 8 weeks after infection. Thus, the effectiveness of rifabutin was especially pronounced when the drug was given prophylactically, three weeks before infection.
When combined therapy with rifabutin and clofazimine was initiated immediately after infection, complete sterilization of the tissues was achieved within 6 to 8 hours. Addition of ethambutol did not improve the efficacy. The same combinations given 3 weeks after infection was less effective.
The combination of rifabutin (10 mg/kg p.o.) with either clofazimine (20 mg/kg p.o.) or kanamycin (20 mg/kg s.c.) or both was more effective than any of these drugs given alone to M. intracellulare-infected mice (C57BL/6) strain for six days/week for 12 weeks starting 24 hours post-infection. The combination of rifabutin and clofazimine plus kanamycin was the most effective of the treatments tested giving complete protection against pulmonary lesions and significant reductions in bacterial counts in the lungs, liver and spleen.
Rifabutin in combination with clarithromycin was significantly more efficacious than clarithromycin alone in Beige mice infected with M. avium complex.
Mycobacterium tuberculosis
The efficacy of rifabutin (up to 10 mg/kg/day x three days) and rifampin (up to 25 mg/kg/day x ten days) was evaluated in CD1 (COBS) mice infected I.V. with M. tuberculosis H37 Rv. Drug treatment was started at either three days or ten days post-infection. Rifabutin was more effective than rifampin, although plasma levels of drug were much higher in rifampin-treated mice. In COBS rats, plasma levels of rifampin were higher than those of rifabutin but, except for liver, tissue levels of rifabutin were much higher than those observed with rifampin. This was especially true in the lung.
Mycobacterium fortuitous
In CD1 mice infected intravenously with M. fortuitous, rifampin was marginally active at 30 mg/kg/day, 5 days a week for 6 weeks, starting from 24 hours post-infection. Rifabutin exhibited significant activity at doses of 4 and 10 mg/kg/day.
Mycobacterium leprae
In a study in which rifabutin (0.00003 - 0.001%) or rifampin (0.01%) were administered in the diet to BALL/C mice infected with a rifampin-resistant of M. leprae, for approximately 6 months, rifabutin was found to be highly effective even at the lowest dose, while rifampin had no effect.
Antibacterial
Several non-Mycobacterial organisms were tested for in vivo susceptibility to rifabutin. In CD1 (COBS) mice infected with Staphylococcus aureus, single oral doses of rifabutin, administered 1-4 hours after infection, showed good antibiotic activity. The ED50 value (on the basis of mortality) for rifabutin given to mice two hours after infection with S. aureus strain PV-1 was 0.4 mg/kg. Gram-negative bacterial infections were more susceptible to rifampin than to rifabutin, while Streptococci and Diplococci infections were more susceptible to rifabutin.
In the majority of the above in vivo studies, where doses equivalent to human doses were given, rifabutin was bacteriostatic, not bactericidal. Bactericidal activity was achieved when additional drugs were given.
16. Non-Clinical Toxicology
General toxicology
The acute oral toxicity of rifabutin in rats, given single oral doses up to 5 g/kg, or in beagle dogs and cynomolgus monkeys, given 2 and 4 g/kg rifabutin was low with no mortality. The oral LD50 in mice was 4.8 g/kg for males and 3.3 g/kg for females. The pharmacotoxic effects observed were relatively minor and consisted of decreased spontaneous activity in mice and rats and gastrointestinal disturbances, i.e. emesis and/or diarrhea in dogs and monkeys. These results are consistent with the antimicrobial properties of the drug.
Subchronic 13-week studies were performed in mice (0, 12.5, 25, 50 and 100 mg/kg/day; 0, 50, 100 and 200 mg/kg/day), rats (0, 25, 50, 100 and 200 mg/kg/day; 0, 25, 50 and 100 mg/kg/day on alternate days; 0, 50, 100 and 200 mg/kg/day), cynomolgus monkeys (0, 10, 20, 40 and 80 mg/kg/day) and baboons (0, 10, 40,and 80 mg/kg/day). No drug-related mortality occurred in all species.
In mice, only slight functional hepatic changes were seen. Body weight gain was reduced at all doses in male mice in one study, and relative spleen weights were increased in both sexes at all doses in another mouse study. Some liver inflammation was seen in high dose female mice.
In rats, multinucleated hepatocytes were observed both following daily administration of rifabutin or administration on alternate days. Ultrastructurally, the multiple nuclei and nucleoli closely resemble those in mononucleated cells. This was not seen in any other species. Rifabutin induced slight dose-related decreases in RBC and related parameters, hyperplasia of the gastric mucosa, increased spleen and liver weights, reduced body weight gains in high-dose rats, decreased spermatogensis in male rats, and uterine hyperplasia in female rats.
In cynomolgus monkeys, the daily oral administration of rifabutin at doses up to 80 mg/kg/day for 13 weeks had minimal effects, the most important of which was an increased bilirubin and decreased LAP at the 80 mg/kg/day dose. Slight fatty infiltration of the liver was seen in cynomolgus monkeys and in baboons at all doses. Decreased testes weight, beginning at a dose of 10 mg/kg/day, was also noted in baboons.
Twelve-month toxicity studies were carried out in mice (0, 8, 32 and 128 mg/kg/day), rats (0, 10, 28 and 80 mg/kg/day) and cynomolgus monkeys (0, 8, 24 and 72 mg/kg/day). These results were in agreement with the previous 13-week studies. No drug-related mortality was noted in all species. In mice, body weight gains were increased in high dose females. In males there was a dose-related increase in plasma cholesterol, with bilirubin and reticulocytes increased at the high dose. High dose females had increased ALT. At 128 mg/kg/day in males, testes weight decreased while liver and lung weights increased. In high-dose females, adrenal, lung, liver and spleen weights increased.
There was a dose-related increase at the 32 and 128 mg/kg/day dose in the incidence of Heinz bodies in reticulocytes.
Both male and female rats showed increased plasma bilirubin at the high dose, and high dose males had increased ALT and AST. Multinucleated hepatocytes were seen in males at all dose groups and in females at 28 and 80 mg/kg/day. Liver and spleen weights increased in mid-dose males and in both sexes at the high dose. High dose males also had decreased testes weights and atrophy of seminiferous tubules. Hyperplasia of the gastric mucosa occurred in both sexes given 80 mg/kg/day.
Male monkeys experienced occasional episodes of emesis at 24 and 72 mg/kg/day. High dose animals showed an increase in plasma bilirubin and triglycerides with lipid deposits in hepatocytes and increased liver weight.
Multinucleated hepatocytes were seen in rats only; liver hypertrophy with functional effects (increased ALT and/or AST, cholesterol, triglycerides and bilirubin values) was observed in all species. Minor changes included slight decreases in RBC and related parameters, sclerosis/hyperplasia of the glandular mucosa of the stomach, and atrophy of the testes in rats.
The significance of the multinucleated hepatocytes found in rats given repeated oral doses of rifabutin is not clear. They have been reported in association with various physiological, nutritional and disease states, and after administration of several structurally and pharmacologically diverse chemical and drug substances. In any case, the presence of multinucleated hepatocytes must be considered rat specific, as they were not found in the other species.
There was no increase of the multinucleated hepatocytes with time and there was no effect in their life span. As expected, this finding is not preneoplastic, as confirmed by the oncogenicity study in rats.
Genotoxicity
Rifabutin (0.125 - 1000 μg/mL) was not mutagenic in the bacterial point mutation assay (Ames Test) using both rifabutin-susceptible and resistant strains of Salmonella typhimurium. Rifabutin was not mutagenic in Schizosaccharomyces pombe P1 and was not genotoxic in V-79 Chinese hamster cells, human lymphocytes in vitro, or mouse bone marrow cells in vivo.
Carcinogenicity
Long term carcinogenicity studies were conducted with rifabutin in mice (0, 20, 60 and 180/100 mg/kg/day) and rats (0, 15, 30, and 60 mg/kg/day). Rifabutin was not carcinogenic in mice at doses up to 180 mg/kg/day, or approximately 36 times the recommended human daily dose. The high dose was reduced from 180 mg/kg/day to 100 mg/kg/day on Day 561, due to excessive mortality in males.
This high-dose treatment group was terminated after 21 months of treatment. Necropsy and histopathological findings indicated that deaths were caused by myocardial vacuolation and fibrosis. Rifabutin was not carcinogenic in the rat at doses up to 60 mg/kg/day, about 12 times the recommended human daily dose. There was a significant increase in the incidence of incidental tumours in the liver of the high dose females but most of these were adenomas. In summary, rifabutin was not carcinogenic in either mice or rats when administered in the diet for up to two years at the MTD.
Reproductive and developmental toxicology
Fertility studies have been performed in male and female rats given rifabutin orally at 0, 10, 40 and 160 mg/kg/day. Fertility was impaired in male rats given 160 mg/kg/day (32 times the recommended human daily dose). The 160 mg/kg/day dose resulted in a reduced number of implants and offspring. In the 160 mg/kg/day treated females, there was an 18% decrease in the number of fetuses per dam associated with a 5-fold increase in post implantation losses. At 40 mg/kg/day (8 times the human dose), rifabutin caused an increase in skeletal variants. Peri- and post-natal studies have been performed in rats given rifabutin orally at 0, 12.5, 50 and 200 mg/kg/day. At 200 mg/kg/day (40 times the human dose), there was a decrease in fetal viability.
Teratogenicity
Embryotoxicity studies have been performed in rats and rabbits given rifabutin orally at 0, 20, 40 and 80 mg/kg/day. At all doses and in both species no teratogenic effects were seen. In rats, at 40 and 80 mg/kg/day, and in rabbits, at 80 mg/kg/day (16 times the human dose), rifabutin caused maternotoxicity and an increase in fetal minor skeletal anomalies.
Special toxicology
Immunopharmacology
The effects of rifabutin and rifampin on humoral and cell-mediated immunity were determined in mice and guinea pigs. Neither rifabutin nor rifampin affected humoral antibody response to SRBC in the mouse at intraperitoneal doses of up to 300 mg/kg and 150 mg/kg, respectively. Although there was no effect on delayed hypersensitivity (DH) when give oral doses of 50 mg/kg in the mouse, both drugs did reduce DH when given intraperitoneal dose of 150 mg/kg. Also, both drugs reduced DH to tuberculin in the mouse but in guinea pigs, rifampin decreased DH to tuberculin whereas rifabutin had no effect. These studies, however, were not extensive and it is difficult to assess their significance.
A study was also conducted to determine the effect of rifabutin on the phagocytic and bactericidal activities of splenic macrophages in the mouse. The mice were given 300 mg/kg rifabutin daily for 30 days and macrophage function was determined for up to 30 days following cessation of treatment.
The results indicated that rifabutin and/or its active metabolites persist in the lungs, liver, and spleen at measurable concentrations for up to 15 days post-treatment and that the phagocytic and bactericidal activities of splenic macrophages as measured using L. monocytogenes as a target were not affected despite the lipidotic effect which rifabutin has on macrophages.
Rifabutin and rifampin were found to inhibit random migration but not chemotaxis of human PMNL. In a study comparing the effects of rifabutin and rifampin on rabbit PMNL, it was found that rifabutin reduced cellular respiration at concentrations of 50 and 100 μg/mL but had no effect on their phagocytic or bactericidal functions. Rifampin inhibited phagocytic function at 100 μg/mL. Since the concentrations of rifabutin used in this study were much higher than those found in plasma of patients treated with rifabutin, it is unlikely that rifabutin will affect PMNL function clinically.
Also, rifabutin did not affect the ability of human PMNL to phagocytize S. aureus in vitro and did not interfere with superoxide formation by human neutrophils in vitro.
